IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v272y2023ics0360544223004310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon tax revenue recycling for biomass/coal co-firing using Stackelberg game: A case study of Jiangsu province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Qian
  • Xu, Jiuping

Abstract

Transitioning to low-carbon, low-cost energy systems is a major challenge. Carbon tax revenue recycling, which imposes a carbon price and then returns the revenue to emitters to encourage green initiatives, is being employed to internalize carbon costs and provide biomass/coal co-firing incentives. A bi-level carbon tax revenue recycling model for biomass/coal co-firing is developed using Stackelberg game, in which the authority is the leader and the coal-fired power plants are the followers. The authority decides on the optimal carbon tax price and recycles the revenue based on the predicted actions of the followers, after which the coal-fired power plants decide on biomass/coal co-firing quantities in response to the leader’s decisions. A case study of Jiangsu Province, China and scenario analyses are given to demonstrate the practicality of the proposed model. The results indicate that carbon tax revenue recycling could potentially drive carbon emission reductions and encourage move towards cleaner energy sources. Revenue recycling is found to increase carbon tax levels from 28.06 to 56.19 CNY per t of carbon and increase biomass co-firing ratios from 7.753% to 9.997%. Some policy implications are provided to promote effective carbon tax revenue recycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Qian & Xu, Jiuping, 2023. "Carbon tax revenue recycling for biomass/coal co-firing using Stackelberg game: A case study of Jiangsu province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:272:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223004310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223004310
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agbor, Ezinwa & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2014. "A review of biomass co-firing in North America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 930-943.
    2. Zhang, Li & Gao, Yan & Zhu, Hongbo & Tao, Li, 2022. "Bi-level stochastic real-time pricing model in multi-energy generation system: A reinforcement learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    3. Boyce, James K., 2018. "Carbon Pricing: Effectiveness and Equity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 52-61.
    4. Zhu, Jianquan & Xia, Yunrui & Mo, Xiemin & Guo, Ye & Chen, Jiajun, 2021. "A bilevel bidding and clearing model incorporated with a pricing strategy for the trading of energy storage use rights," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Li, Jin & Wang, Rui & Li, Haoran & Nie, Yaoyu & Song, Xinke & Li, Mingyu & Shi, Mai & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Arnette, Andrew N., 2017. "Renewable energy and carbon capture and sequestration for a reduced carbon energy plan: An optimization model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 254-265.
    7. Basu, Prabir & Butler, James & Leon, Mathias A., 2011. "Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 282-288.
    8. Truong, An Ha & Ha-Duong, Minh & Tran, Hoang Anh, 2022. "Economics of co-firing rice straw in coal power plants in Vietnam," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Xu, Jiuping & Huang, Qian & Lv, Chengwei & Feng, Qing & Wang, Fengjuan, 2018. "Carbon emissions reductions oriented dynamic equilibrium strategy using biomass-coal co-firing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 184-197.
    10. Tu, Yan & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Gang, Jun & Liechty, Merrill & Xu, Jiuping & Lev, Benjamin, 2015. "Administrative and market-based allocation mechanism for regional water resources planning," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 156-173.
    11. Martin L. Weitzman, 2007. "A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(3), pages 703-724, September.
    12. C. Oberschelp & S. Pfister & C. E. Raptis & S. Hellweg, 2019. "Global emission hotspots of coal power generation," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(2), pages 113-121, February.
    13. Bertrand, Vincent & Dequiedt, Benjamin & Le Cadre, Elodie, 2014. "Biomass for electricity in the EU-27: Potential demand, CO2 abatements and breakeven prices for co-firing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 631-644.
    14. Roni, Mohammad S. & Chowdhury, Sudipta & Mamun, Saleh & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Lein, William & Johnson, Samuel, 2017. "Biomass co-firing technology with policies, challenges, and opportunities: A global review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1089-1101.
    15. Johnston, Craig M.T. & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2015. "Economics of co-firing coal and biomass: An application to Western Canada," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 7-17.
    16. Zhang, Ming & Wang, Wenwen, 2012. "Using an energy flow chart to analyze Jiangsu Province’s energy balance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 307-312.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/14543 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van & Lu, Jye-Chyi, 2019. "Multiobjective robust fuzzy stochastic approach for sustainable smart grid design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 929-939.
    19. Atherton, John & Xie, Wanni & Aditya, Leonardus Kevin & Zhou, Xiaochi & Karmakar, Gourab & Akroyd, Jethro & Mosbach, Sebastian & Lim, Mei Qi & Kraft, Markus, 2021. "How does a carbon tax affect Britain’s power generation composition?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    20. Zhang, Qin & Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Peng & Ding, Hao, 2013. "Cost Analysis of straw-based power generation in Jiangsu Province, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 785-793.
    21. Qiu, Rui & Xu, Jiuping & Ke, Ruimin & Zeng, Ziqiang & Wang, Yinhai, 2020. "Carbon pricing initiatives-based bi-level pollution routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 203-217.
    22. Verma, Munna & Loha, Chanchal & Sinha, Amar Nath & Chatterjee, Pradip Kumar, 2017. "Drying of biomass for utilising in co-firing with coal and its impact on environment – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 732-741.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Yun-Long & Liu, Lan-Cui & Kang, Jia-Ning & Peng, Song & Mi, Zhifu & Liao, Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2024. "Economic feasibility assessment of coal-biomass co-firing power generation technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yun-Long & Liu, Lan-Cui & Kang, Jia-Ning & Peng, Song & Mi, Zhifu & Liao, Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2024. "Economic feasibility assessment of coal-biomass co-firing power generation technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    2. Aviso, K.B. & Sy, C.L. & Tan, R.R. & Ubando, A.T., 2020. "Fuzzy optimization of carbon management networks based on direct and indirect biomass co-firing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Li, Jin & Wang, Rui & Li, Haoran & Nie, Yaoyu & Song, Xinke & Li, Mingyu & Shi, Mai & Zheng, Xinzhu & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Yang, Bo & Wei, Yi-Ming & Hou, Yunbing & Li, Hui & Wang, Pengtao, 2019. "Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Yang, Bo & Wei, Yi-Ming & Liu, Lan-Cui & Hou, Yun-Bing & Zhang, Kun & Yang, Lai & Feng, Ye, 2021. "Life cycle cost assessment of biomass co-firing power plants with CO2 capture and storage considering multiple incentives," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Agbor, Ezinwa & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessments of sixty scenarios for co-firing biomass with coal and natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 433-449.
    7. Truong, An Ha & Ha-Duong, Minh & Tran, Hoang Anh, 2022. "Economics of co-firing rice straw in coal power plants in Vietnam," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Topal, Huseyin & Taner, Tolga & Naqvi, Syed Arslan Hassan & Altınsoy, Yelda & Amirabedin, Ehsan & Ozkaymak, Mehmet, 2017. "Exergy analysis of a circulating fluidized bed power plant co-firing with olive pits: A case study of power plant in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 40-46.
    9. Xu, Jiuping & Huang, Qian & Lv, Chengwei & Feng, Qing & Wang, Fengjuan, 2018. "Carbon emissions reductions oriented dynamic equilibrium strategy using biomass-coal co-firing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 184-197.
    10. Munawar, Muhammad Assad & Khoja, Asif Hussain & Naqvi, Salman Raza & Mehran, Muhammad Taqi & Hassan, Muhammad & Liaquat, Rabia & Dawood, Usama Fida, 2021. "Challenges and opportunities in biomass ash management and its utilization in novel applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Caurla, Sylvain & Bertrand, Vincent & Delacote, Philippe & Le Cadre, Elodie, 2018. "Heat or power: How to increase the use of energy wood at the lowest cost?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 85-103.
    12. Mohd Idris, Muhammad Nurariffudin & Hashim, Haslenda & Leduc, Sylvain & Yowargana, Ping & Kraxner, Florian & Woon, Kok Sin, 2021. "Deploying bioenergy for decarbonizing Malaysian energy sectors and alleviating renewable energy poverty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Milićević, Aleksandar & Belošević, Srdjan & Crnomarković, Nenad & Tomanović, Ivan & Tucaković, Dragan, 2020. "Mathematical modelling and optimisation of lignite and wheat straw co-combustion in 350 MWe boiler furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Ramiro de Ávila Peres, 2024. "Social Discounting and the Tragedy of the Horizon: from the Stern-Nordhaus debate to target-consistent prices," Working Papers Series 593, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    15. Jens Peters & Jan May & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2020. "Flexibility of CFB Combustion: An Investigation of Co-Combustion with Biomass and RDF at Part Load in Pilot Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Li, Kaiyang & Zeng, Yimin, 2022. "Corrosion of heat exchanger materials in co-combustion thermal power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Weiwei Wang, 2023. "Integrated Assessment of Economic Supply and Environmental Effects of Biomass Co-Firing in Coal Power Plants: A Case Study of Jiangsu, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    18. Qiu, Rui & Xu, Jiuping & Zeng, Ziqiang & Chen, Xin & Wang, Yinhai, 2022. "Carbon tax policy-induced air travel carbon emission reduction and biofuel usage in China," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Clancy, John Matthew & Curtis, John & Ó’Gallachóir, Brian, 2018. "Modelling national policy making to promote bioenergy in heat, transport and electricity to 2030 – Interactions, impacts and conflicts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 579-593.
    20. Verma, Munna & Loha, Chanchal & Sinha, Amar Nath & Chatterjee, Pradip Kumar, 2017. "Drying of biomass for utilising in co-firing with coal and its impact on environment – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 732-741.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:272:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223004310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.