IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v263y2023ipes0360544222030274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flow characteristics analysis and power comparison for two novel types of vertically staggered wind farms

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Jian
  • Zhang, Yu
  • Xu, Zhongyun
  • Li, Chun

Abstract

Reducing the wake effect to improve the power output of wind farms is identified as one of the grand challenges in wind energy science. To solve this problem, the windbreak and vertical axis wind turbine are added to the traditional aligned wind farm to form two novel types of vertically staggered wind farms (VSWF). A careful investigation is conducted to find the effect of crucial parameters on the power output and flow characteristics of proposed VSWFs. Results show that windbreak and VAWT both benefit the recovery of upstream wind turbine wake due to the mixing of wind flow and reducing wind shear, which increases the power output of VSWFs. Moreover, the power growth rate of VSWFs increases with the spacing. An interesting finding is that the larger tilt angle of the windbreak weakens the clockwise rotating vortex in the wake of the windbreak and increases the power output of the VSWF. Another important finding is that the power output of VSWF with VAWT is much greater than that of the windbreak, whose growth rate can achieve 13.1% (when LV = 6D). A possible explanation is that VAWT provides better wind penetrability and reduces surface roughness.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Jian & Zhang, Yu & Xu, Zhongyun & Li, Chun, 2023. "Flow characteristics analysis and power comparison for two novel types of vertically staggered wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pe:s0360544222030274
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222030274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shakoor, Rabia & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Raheem, Abdur & Wu, Yuan-Kang, 2016. "Wake effect modeling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen׳s model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1048-1059.
    2. Nicolas Tobin & Leonardo P. Chamorro, 2017. "Windbreak Effects Within Infinite Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Smith, Matthew M. & Bentrup, Gary & Kellerman, Todd & MacFarland, Katherine & Straight, Richard & Ameyaw, Lord, 2021. "Windbreaks in the United States: A systematic review of producer-reported benefits, challenges, management activities and drivers of adoption," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Bai, Chi-Jeng & Wang, Wei-Cheng, 2016. "Review of computational and experimental approaches to analysis of aerodynamic performance in horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 506-519.
    5. Fleming, Paul A. & Gebraad, Pieter M.O. & Lee, Sang & van Wingerden, Jan-Willem & Johnson, Kathryn & Churchfield, Matt & Michalakes, John & Spalart, Philippe & Moriarty, Patrick, 2014. "Evaluating techniques for redirecting turbine wakes using SOWFA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 211-218.
    6. Khan, Salman A. & Rehman, Shafiqur, 2013. "Iterative non-deterministic algorithms in on-shore wind farm design: A brief survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 370-384.
    7. Yu, Guohua & Shen, Xin & Zhu, Xiaocheng & Du, Zhaohui, 2011. "An insight into the separate flow and stall delay for HAWT," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 69-76.
    8. Perveen, Rehana & Kishor, Nand & Mohanty, Soumya R., 2014. "Off-shore wind farm development: Present status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 780-792.
    9. DuPont, Bryony & Cagan, Jonathan & Moriarty, Patrick, 2016. "An advanced modeling system for optimization of wind farm layout and wind turbine sizing using a multi-level extended pattern search algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 802-814.
    10. Chen, Bin & Xie, Lei & Li, Yongzhan & Gao, Baocheng, 2020. "Acoustical damage detection of wind turbine yaw system using Bayesian network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1364-1372.
    11. Göçmen, Tuhfe & Laan, Paul van der & Réthoré, Pierre-Elouan & Diaz, Alfredo Peña & Larsen, Gunner Chr. & Ott, Søren, 2016. "Wind turbine wake models developed at the technical university of Denmark: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 752-769.
    12. Rocha, P.A. Costa & Rocha, H.H. Barbosa & Carneiro, F.O. Moura & Vieira da Silva, M.E. & Bueno, A. Valente, 2014. "k–ω SST (shear stress transport) turbulence model calibration: A case study on a small scale horizontal axis wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 412-418.
    13. Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza & Archer, Cristina L., 2017. "Wind farm hub height optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 905-921.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thé, Jesse & Yu, Hesheng, 2017. "A critical review on the simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics focusing on hybrid RANS-LES methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 257-289.
    2. Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza & Archer, Cristina L., 2017. "Wind farm hub height optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 905-921.
    3. Pollini, Nicolò, 2022. "Topology optimization of wind farm layouts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1015-1027.
    4. Tao, Siyu & Xu, Qingshan & Feijóo, Andrés & Zheng, Gang & Zhou, Jiemin, 2020. "Nonuniform wind farm layout optimization: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    5. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2020. "URANS simulations of a horizontal axis wind turbine under stall condition using Reynolds stress turbulence models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    6. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing & Gao, Xiaoxia, 2019. "Investigation into spacing restriction and layout optimization of wind farm with multiple types of wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 637-650.
    7. Archer, Cristina L. & Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza & Yan, Chi & Wu, Sicheng & Pan, Yang & Brodie, Joseph F. & Maguire, A. Eoghan, 2018. "Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1187-1207.
    8. Manisha Sawant & Sameer Thakare & A. Prabhakara Rao & Andrés E. Feijóo-Lorenzo & Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde, 2021. "A Review on State-of-the-Art Reviews in Wind-Turbine- and Wind-Farm-Related Topics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    9. Muhammad Bin Ali & Zeshan Ahmad & Saad Alshahrani & Muhammad Rizwan Younis & Irsa Talib & Muhammad Imran, 2022. "A Case Study: Layout Optimization of Three Gorges Wind Farm Pakistan, Using Genetic Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Masoudi, Seiied Mohsen & Baneshi, Mehdi, 2022. "Layout optimization of a wind farm considering grids of various resolutions, wake effect, and realistic wind speed and wind direction data: A techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    11. Li, B. & Zhou, D.L. & Wang, Y. & Shuai, Y. & Liu, Q.Z. & Cai, W.H., 2020. "The design of a small lab-scale wind turbine model with high performance similarity to its utility-scale prototype," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 435-444.
    12. Guirguis, David & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2017. "Gradient-based multidisciplinary design of wind farms with continuous-variable formulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 279-291.
    13. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2017. "Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1283-1297.
    14. Sun, Haiying & Qiu, Changyu & Lu, Lin & Gao, Xiaoxia & Chen, Jian & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Wind turbine power modelling and optimization using artificial neural network with wind field experimental data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    15. Dong, Xinghui & Li, Jia & Gao, Di & Zheng, Kai, 2021. "Wind speed modeling for cascade clusters of wind turbines Part 2: Wind speed reduction and aggregation superposition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    16. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar & Foley, Aoife M., 2020. "Bilateral Gaussian Wake Model Formulation for Wind Farms: A Forecasting based approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Hanan M. Taleb & Bassam Abu Hijleh, 2021. "Optimizing the Power Generation of a Wind Farm in Low Wind Speed Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Sedlar, D. Karasalihović & Vulin, D. & Krajačić, G. & Jukić, L., 2019. "Offshore gas production infrastructure reutilisation for blue energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 159-174.
    19. Zhu, Jie & Zhou, Zhong & Cai, Xin, 2020. "Multi-objective aerodynamic and structural integrated optimization design of wind turbines at the system level through a coupled blade-tower model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 523-537.
    20. Azlan, F. & Kurnia, J.C. & Tan, B.T. & Ismadi, M.-Z., 2021. "Review on optimisation methods of wind farm array under three classical wind condition problems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pe:s0360544222030274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.