IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v263y2023ipds0360544222027694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of machine learning methods for predicting the methane production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhengxin
  • Peng, Xinggan
  • Xia, Ao
  • Shah, Akeel A.
  • Yan, Huchao
  • Huang, Yun
  • Zhu, Xianqing
  • Zhu, Xun
  • Liao, Qiang

Abstract

Biogas derived from the anaerobic digestion of biomass can provide a carbon-neutral resource for green energy supply in the future. The biochemical methane potential (BMP) test has been widely applied to assess the characteristics of methane production from anaerobic digestion in batch mode. However, the determination of key parameters in the BMP test, such as specific methane yield (SMY), usually requires long-term experiments, especially for lignocellulosic feedstocks with slow degradation rates. This study aims to propose an appropriate data-driven model for the efficient prediction of the SMY using data from 277 samples of various lignocellulosic biomass materials by evaluating ten different machine learning (ML) methods. The Pearson coefficient matrix indicates that the chemical components are more relevant as attributes for the ML models, compared to element compositions, and the content of lignin has a strong linear correlation with SMY. Classic nonlinear ML methods (R2 ≥ 0.61) perform better than linear methods (R2 ≤ 0.56), and an ensemble learning model (R2 = 0.71) is better than a single learner (R2 ≤ 0.67). A K-nearest neighbor (KNN) model using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) obtains the best performance (R2 = 0.75, MAE = 30.2 mL/gVS). The generalization performance of the best model is found to have an average relative error of 10.05%.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zhengxin & Peng, Xinggan & Xia, Ao & Shah, Akeel A. & Yan, Huchao & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xianqing & Zhu, Xun & Liao, Qiang, 2023. "Comparison of machine learning methods for predicting the methane production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pd:s0360544222027694
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222027694
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Youwang & Wang, Haiyong & Zhang, Xinghua & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Chenguang & Ma, Longlong, 2022. "Accurate prediction of chemical exergy of technical lignins for exergy-based assessment on sustainable utilization processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Sarah Webb, 2018. "Deep learning for biology," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7693), pages 555-557, February.
    3. Christopher Potter & Steven Klooster & Vanessa Genovese, 2012. "Net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems from 2000 to 2009," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(2), pages 365-378, November.
    4. Yin, Shi & Liu, Hui, 2022. "Wind power prediction based on outlier correction, ensemble reinforcement learning, and residual correction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    5. Li, Yunzhu & Liu, Tianyuan & Wang, Yuqi & Xie, Yonghui, 2022. "Deep learning based real-time energy extraction system modeling for flapping foil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Yang, Ke & Wu, Kai & Zhang, Huiyan, 2022. "Machine learning prediction of the yield and oxygen content of bio-oil via biomass characteristics and pyrolysis conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    8. Jebli, Imane & Belouadha, Fatima-Zahra & Kabbaj, Mohammed Issam & Tilioua, Amine, 2021. "Prediction of solar energy guided by pearson correlation using machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Keith T. Butler & Daniel W. Davies & Hugh Cartwright & Olexandr Isayev & Aron Walsh, 2018. "Machine learning for molecular and materials science," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7715), pages 547-555, July.
    10. Mujtaba, M.A. & Masjuki, H.H. & Kalam, M.A. & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Gul, M. & Farooq, M. & Soudagar, Manzoore Elahi M. & Ahmed, Waqar & Harith, M.H. & Yusoff, M.N.A.M., 2020. "Ultrasound-assisted process optimization and tribological characteristics of biodiesel from palm-sesame oil via response surface methodology and extreme learning machine - Cuckoo search," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 202-214.
    11. Kung, Chih-Chun & Lan, Xiaolong & Yang, Yunxia & Kung, Shan-Shan & Chang, Meng-Shiuh, 2022. "Effects of green bonds on Taiwan's bioenergy development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    12. Elmaz, Furkan & Yücel, Özgün & Mutlu, Ali Yener, 2020. "Predictive modeling of biomass gasification with machine learning-based regression methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Li, Dezhi & Li, Shuo & Zhang, Shubo & Sun, Jianrui & Wang, Licheng & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Aging state prediction for supercapacitors based on heuristic kalman filter optimization extreme learning machine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    14. Vasiliki Kamperidou & Paschalina Terzopoulou, 2021. "Anaerobic Digestion of Lignocellulosic Waste Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Wang, Shule & Yang, Hanmin & Shi, Ziyi & Zaini, Ilman Nuran & Wen, Yuming & Jiang, Jianchun & Jönsson, Pär Göran & Yang, Weihong, 2022. "Renewable hydrogen production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste through a novel carbon-negative process concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    16. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    17. Coşgun, Ahmet & Günay, M. Erdem & Yıldırım, Ramazan, 2021. "Exploring the critical factors of algal biomass and lipid production for renewable fuel production by machine learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1299-1317.
    18. Tijana Radivojević & Zak Costello & Kenneth Workman & Hector Garcia Martin, 2020. "A machine learning Automated Recommendation Tool for synthetic biology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Benteng & Lin, Richen & Bose, Archishman & Huerta, Jorge Diaz & Kang, Xihui & Deng, Chen & Murphy, Jerry D., 2023. "Economic and environmental viability of biofuel production from organic wastes: A pathway towards competitive carbon neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. He, Xiaoman & Deng, Chen & Li, Pengfei & Yu, Wenbing & Chen, Huichao & Lin, Richen & Shen, Dekui & Baroutian, Saeid, 2024. "The impact of salinity on biomethane production and microbial community in the anaerobic digestion of food waste components," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    3. Liu, Changyu & Sun, Yongxiang & Bian, Ji & Hu, Wanyu & Zhang, Chengjun & Wu, Yangyang & Li, Pengfei & Li, Dong, 2023. "Mechanism of solar photo-thermal transformation for baffled liquid on energy and mass transfer efficiency in direct absorption anaerobic reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    2. Oxana Babecka Kucharcukova & Jan Bruha, 2016. "Nowcasting the Czech Trade Balance," Working Papers 2016/11, Czech National Bank.
    3. Carstensen, Kai & Heinrich, Markus & Reif, Magnus & Wolters, Maik H., 2020. "Predicting ordinary and severe recessions with a three-state Markov-switching dynamic factor model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 829-850.
    4. Hou-Tai Chang & Ping-Huai Wang & Wei-Fang Chen & Chen-Ju Lin, 2022. "Risk Assessment of Early Lung Cancer with LDCT and Health Examinations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.
    6. Nicolaj N. Mühlbach, 2020. "Tree-based Synthetic Control Methods: Consequences of moving the US Embassy," CREATES Research Papers 2020-04, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    7. Wang, Qiao & Zhou, Wei & Cheng, Yonggang & Ma, Gang & Chang, Xiaolin & Miao, Yu & Chen, E, 2018. "Regularized moving least-square method and regularized improved interpolating moving least-square method with nonsingular moment matrices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 325(C), pages 120-145.
    8. Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy & Adrian S. Lewis, 2018. "Error Bounds, Quadratic Growth, and Linear Convergence of Proximal Methods," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 919-948, August.
    9. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    10. Lucian Belascu & Alexandra Horobet & Georgiana Vrinceanu & Consuela Popescu, 2021. "Performance Dissimilarities in European Union Manufacturing: The Effect of Ownership and Technological Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    12. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Stefan Wager, 2018. "Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(4), pages 597-623, September.
    13. Andrea Carriero & Todd E. Clark & Massimiliano Marcellino, 2022. "Specification Choices in Quantile Regression for Empirical Macroeconomics," Working Papers 22-25, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    14. Kim, Hyun Hak & Swanson, Norman R., 2018. "Mining big data using parsimonious factor, machine learning, variable selection and shrinkage methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 339-354.
    15. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    16. Yize Zhao & Matthias Chung & Brent A. Johnson & Carlos S. Moreno & Qi Long, 2016. "Hierarchical Feature Selection Incorporating Known and Novel Biological Information: Identifying Genomic Features Related to Prostate Cancer Recurrence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1427-1439, October.
    17. Chuliá, Helena & Garrón, Ignacio & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Daily growth at risk: Financial or real drivers? The answer is not always the same," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 762-776.
    18. Enrico Bergamini & Georg Zachmann, 2020. "Exploring EU’s Regional Potential in Low-Carbon Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    19. Jie Jian & Peijun Sang & Mu Zhu, 2024. "Two Gaussian Regularization Methods for Time-Varying Networks," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(4), pages 853-873, December.
    20. Qianyun Li & Runmin Shi & Faming Liang, 2019. "Drug sensitivity prediction with high-dimensional mixture regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pd:s0360544222027694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.