IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v260y2022ics0360544222020436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and economic performance comparison of heat pump and power cycle in low grade waste heat recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Zhimin
  • Feng, Xiao
  • Yang, Minbo
  • Wang, Yufei

Abstract

For the sake of making an appropriate choice for the reuse of low grade waste heat, the mechanical heat pump, steam turbine (ST), and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) are modeled by Aspen Plus. The working conditions of 100–150 °C waste heat temperatures, as well as 10–30 °C heat pump temperature lifts are simulated and calculated. The price ratio of electricity to heat is introduced as an important economic variable. The energy and economic performance of the three technologies in low grade waste heat recovery are compared and analyzed based on the exergy efficiency and annual revenue. The results indicate that in terms of the exergy efficiency, the mechanical heat pump is always the best choice. From the perspective of the annual revenue, the mechanical heat pump is the best choice in most cases. The chance that the annual revenue of the ORC and ST is greater than that of the mechanical heat pump arises only when the price ratio of electricity to heat is greater than 5. As for the payback period, all the cycles can meet the requirements of enterprises. A guide of the selection of waste heat recovery technology based on economics is drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Zhimin & Feng, Xiao & Yang, Minbo & Wang, Yufei, 2022. "Energy and economic performance comparison of heat pump and power cycle in low grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:260:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222020436
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222020436
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Zhimin & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Performance comparison of different heat pumps in low-temperature waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    3. Oluleye, Gbemi & Jiang, Ning & Smith, Robin & Jobson, Megan, 2017. "A novel screening framework for waste heat utilization technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 367-381.
    4. Kwak, Dong-Hun & Binns, Michael & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2014. "Integrated design and optimization of technologies for utilizing low grade heat in process industries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 307-322.
    5. Liu, Liuchen & Wu, Jinlu & Zhong, Fen & Gao, Naiping & Cui, Guomin, 2021. "Development of a novel cogeneration system by combing organic rankine cycle and heat pump cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Junying Wei & Qi Hua & Jidai Wang & Zheng Jiang & Jihong Wang & Liang Yuan, 2020. "Overview of the Development and Application of the Twin Screw Expander," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    7. van de Bor, D.M. & Infante Ferreira, C.A. & Kiss, Anton A., 2015. "Low grade waste heat recovery using heat pumps and power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 864-873.
    8. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Andrea Meroni & Fredrik Haglind, 2017. "A Comparison of Organic and Steam Rankine Cycle Power Systems for Waste Heat Recovery on Large Ships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Brückner, Sarah & Liu, Selina & Miró, Laia & Radspieler, Michael & Cabeza, Luisa F. & Lävemann, Eberhard, 2015. "Industrial waste heat recovery technologies: An economic analysis of heat transformation technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 157-167.
    10. Nikunj Gangar & Sandro Macchietto & Christos N. Markides, 2020. "Recovery and Utilization of Low-Grade Waste Heat in the Oil-Refining Industry Using Heat Engines and Heat Pumps: An International Technoeconomic Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, May.
    11. van de Bor, D.M. & Infante Ferreira, C.A., 2013. "Quick selection of industrial heat pump types including the impact of thermodynamic losses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 312-322.
    12. Xu, Z.Y. & Gao, J.T. & Hu, Bin & Wang, R.Z., 2022. "Multi-criterion comparison of compression and absorption heat pumps for ultra-low grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    13. Varga, Zoltán & Palotai, Balázs, 2017. "Comparison of low temperature waste heat recovery methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1286-1292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Sun & Yu Qin & Ran Liu & Guoshun Wang & Dingqun Liu & Yongping Yang, 2023. "Cycle Characteristics of a New High-Temperature Heat Pump Based on Absorption–Compression Revolution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Zhu, Huichao & Zhang, Houcheng, 2023. "Upgrading the low-grade waste heat from alkaline fuel cells via isopropanol-acetone-hydrogen chemical heat pumps," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Siyao & Cui, Chengtian & He, Jie & Sun, Jinsheng, 2018. "Feasibility assessment of a novel refrigeration FCC gas plant driven by self waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 356-366.
    2. Dokl, Monika & Gomilšek, Rok & Čuček, Lidija & Abikoye, Ben & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2022. "Maximizing the power output and net present value of organic Rankine cycle: Application to aluminium industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    3. Wang, Lili & Xia, Li & Li, Chengyun & Tian, Yuan & Teng, Junfeng & Sun, Xiaoyan & Xiang, Shuguang, 2023. "Exergy, economic, and exergoenvironmental analyses of new combined heat and power process based on mechanism analysis of working fluid screening," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    4. Vojtěch Turek & Bohuslav Kilkovský & Ján Daxner & Dominika Babička Fialová & Zdeněk Jegla, 2024. "Industrial Waste Heat Utilization in the European Union—An Engineering-Centric Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-29, April.
    5. Zhang, Ying & Deng, Shuai & Ni, Jiaxin & Zhao, Li & Yang, Xingyang & Li, Minxia, 2017. "A literature research on feasible application of mixed working fluid in flexible distributed energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 377-390.
    6. Mat Nawi, Z. & Kamarudin, S.K. & Sheikh Abdullah, S.R. & Lam, S.S., 2019. "The potential of exhaust waste heat recovery (WHR) from marine diesel engines via organic rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-31.
    7. Bühler, Fabian & Petrović, Stefan & Holm, Fridolin Müller & Karlsson, Kenneth & Elmegaard, Brian, 2018. "Spatiotemporal and economic analysis of industrial excess heat as a resource for district heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 715-728.
    8. Cignitti, Stefano & Andreasen, Jesper G. & Haglind, Fredrik & Woodley, John M. & Abildskov, Jens, 2017. "Integrated working fluid-thermodynamic cycle design of organic Rankine cycle power systems for waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 442-453.
    9. Joon-Young Kim & Shelly Salim & Jae-Min Cha & Sungho Park, 2019. "Development of Total Capital Investment Estimation Module for Waste Heat Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Daniele Dadi & Vito Introna & Miriam Benedetti, 2022. "Decarbonization of Heat through Low-Temperature Waste Heat Recovery: Proposal of a Tool for the Preliminary Evaluation of Technologies in the Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, October.
    11. Zhu, Sipeng & Zhang, Kun & Deng, Kangyao, 2020. "A review of waste heat recovery from the marine engine with highly efficient bottoming power cycles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Men, Yiyu & Liu, Xiaohua & Zhang, Tao, 2021. "A review of boiler waste heat recovery technologies in the medium-low temperature range," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    13. Gudjonsdottir, V. & Infante Ferreira, C.A. & Rexwinkel, Glenn & Kiss, Anton A., 2017. "Enhanced performance of wet compression-resorption heat pumps by using NH3-CO2-H2O as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 531-542.
    14. Liya Ren & Huaixin Wang, 2019. "Parametric Optimization and Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of Organic Trans-Critical Cycle, Steam Flash Cycle, and Steam Dual-Pressure Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Gábor Györke & Axel Groniewsky & Attila R. Imre, 2019. "A Simple Method of Finding New Dry and Isentropic Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, February.
    16. Wang, Jikang & Li, Yan & Yuan, Han & Zhang, Zhixiang & Ding, Zhuang & Mei, Ning, 2020. "The energy-saving study of water heater based on source-sink matching principle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    17. Patrick Linke & Athanasios I. Papadopoulos & Panos Seferlis, 2015. "Systematic Methods for Working Fluid Selection and the Design, Integration and Control of Organic Rankine Cycles—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-47, May.
    18. Lin, Yuancheng & Chong, Chin Hao & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2022. "Quantification of waste heat potential in China: A top-down Societal Waste Heat Accounting Model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    19. Tan, Jingqi & Wei, Jianjian & Jin, Tao, 2020. "Electrical-analogy network model of a modified two-phase thermofluidic oscillator with regenerator for low-grade heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    20. Rodríguez, R. & Bello, V.G. & Díaz-Aguado, M.B., 2017. "Application of eco-efficiency in a coal-burning power plant benefitting both the environment and citizens: Design of a ‘city water heating’ system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 789-799.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:260:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222020436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.