IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v253y2022ics0360544222010428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physics-informed surrogate modeling for hydro-fracture geometry prediction based on deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Yutian
  • Wang, Bo
  • Zhao, Yingying
  • Yang, Xiaochen
  • Li, Lizhe
  • Dong, Mingzhi
  • Lv, Qin
  • Zhou, Fujian
  • Gu, Ning
  • Shang, Li

Abstract

Hydro-fracture geometry prediction is of great practical importance for optimizing construction parameters and evaluating stimulation effects. Existing physical simulation methods are computationally intensive. Deep learning-based methods offer fast model inference, yet typically require a large amount of field data for accurate model training and lack model interpretability in explaining the complex physical processes. This work presents a physics-informed surrogate modeling method for hydro-fracture geometry prediction. The proposed method encodes the hydro-fracture physical laws, in the form of partial differential equations, as a loss term to govern the training process of the surrogate model, aiming to alleviate the data requirement for model training. Experimental studies demonstrate that the proposed modeling method effectively reduces the training data requirement and improves model accuracy and interpretability.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Yutian & Wang, Bo & Zhao, Yingying & Yang, Xiaochen & Li, Lizhe & Dong, Mingzhi & Lv, Qin & Zhou, Fujian & Gu, Ning & Shang, Li, 2022. "Physics-informed surrogate modeling for hydro-fracture geometry prediction based on deep learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:253:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222010428
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222010428
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan, Dongyan & Sun, Hai & Yao, Jun & Zhang, Kai & Yan, Xia & Sun, Zhixue, 2021. "Well production forecasting based on ARIMA-LSTM model considering manual operations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Ali, Aliyuda, 2021. "Data-driven based machine learning models for predicting the deliverability of underground natural gas storage in salt caverns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Rahm, Dianne, 2011. "Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays: The case of Texas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2974-2981, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Guodong & Luo, Xin & Jiao, Jiu Jimmy & Jiang, Chuanyin, 2023. "Fracture network characterization with deep generative model based stochastic inversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Delu & Gan, Jun & Mao, Jinqi & Chen, Fan & Yu, Lan, 2023. "Forecasting power demand in China with a CNN-LSTM model including multimodal information," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    2. Zilliox, Skylar & Smith, Jessica M., 2017. "Memorandums of understanding and public trust in local government for Colorado's unconventional energy industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 72-81.
    3. Kriesky, J. & Goldstein, B.D. & Zell, K. & Beach, S., 2013. "Differing opinions about natural gas drilling in two adjacent counties with different levels of drilling activity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 228-236.
    4. Zhou, Junping & Tian, Shifeng & Zhou, Lei & Xian, Xuefu & Yang, Kang & Jiang, Yongdong & Zhang, Chengpeng & Guo, Yaowen, 2020. "Experimental investigation on the influence of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation time on the permeability of fractured shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Timmins, Christopher & Vissing, Ashley, 2022. "Environmental justice and Coasian bargaining: The role of race, ethnicity, and income in lease negotiations for shale gas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    6. Arnold, Gwen & Farrer, Benjamin & Holahan, Robert, 2018. "How do landowners learn about high-volume hydraulic fracturing? A survey of Eastern Ohio landowners in active or proposed drilling units," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 455-464.
    7. Liu, Shuhan & Sun, Wenqiang, 2023. "Attention mechanism-aided data- and knowledge-driven soft sensors for predicting blast furnace gas generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    8. Munasib, Abdul & Rickman, Dan S., 2015. "Regional economic impacts of the shale gas and tight oil boom: A synthetic control analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-17.
    9. Anna Samnioti & Vassilis Gaganis, 2023. "Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation—A Review—Part II," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-53, September.
    10. Wen, Kai & Jiao, Jianfeng & Zhao, Kang & Yin, Xiong & Liu, Yuan & Gong, Jing & Li, Cuicui & Hong, Bingyuan, 2023. "Rapid transient operation control method of natural gas pipeline networks based on user demand prediction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    11. Lv, Sheng-Xiang & Wang, Lin, 2022. "Deep learning combined wind speed forecasting with hybrid time series decomposition and multi-objective parameter optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    12. Hai Wang & Shengnan Chen, 2023. "Insights into the Application of Machine Learning in Reservoir Engineering: Current Developments and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, January.
    13. Jenner, Steffen & Lamadrid, Alberto J., 2013. "Shale gas vs. coal: Policy implications from environmental impact comparisons of shale gas, conventional gas, and coal on air, water, and land in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 442-453.
    14. Soheila Khajoui & Saeid Dehyadegari & Sayyed Abdolmajid Jalaee, 2024. "Forecasting Imports in OECD Member Countries and Iran by Using Neural Network Algorithms of LSTM," Papers 2402.01648, arXiv.org.
    15. Wang, Jinsheng & Ryan, David & Anthony, Edward J., 2011. "Reducing the greenhouse gas footprint of shale gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 8196-8199.
    16. Ma, Bin & Guo, Xing & Li, Penghui, 2023. "Adaptive energy management strategy based on a model predictive control with real-time tuning weight for hybrid energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    17. Zhang, Xiong & Liu, Wei & Jiang, Deyi & Qiao, Weibiao & Liu, Enbin & Zhang, Nan & Fan, Jinyang, 2021. "Investigation on the influences of interlayer contents on stability and usability of energy storage caverns in bedded rock salt," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    18. Joshua C. Hall & Christopher Shultz & E. Frank Stephenson, 2018. "The political economy of local fracking bans," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 42(2), pages 397-408, April.
    19. Aba, Michael M. & Parente, Virginia & dos Santos, Edmilson Moutinho, 2022. "Estimation of water demand of the three major Brazilian shale-gas basins: Implications for water availability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Le Anh Nguyen Long & Megan Foster & Gwen Arnold, 2019. "The impact of stakeholder engagement on local policy decision making," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 549-571, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:253:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222010428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.