IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v239y2022ipds0360544221026645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and 3E analysis of a hybrid power plant integrated with a single-effect absorption chiller driven by a heliostat field: A case study for Doha, Qatar

Author

Listed:
  • Nedaei, Navid
  • Hamrang, Farzad
  • Farshi, L. Garousi

Abstract

This study suggests a novel zero-emission combined cooling and power (CCP) system using a high-temperature solar field, i.e., heliostat reflectors and a central receiver as the heat supplier of the whole system. In addition to the solar field, the proposed system consists of a hybrid power plant comprising a closed Brayton cycle using helium gas and a Kalina cycle, and a cooling production unit through a single-effect absorption chiller. To ameliorate the technical contribution of the current research work, the system suggested here was considered for a case study in Doha, Qatar. Hence, a comprehensive parametric analysis taking into account the energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic (3E analysis) performance criteria based on crucial design parameters is conducted. Furthermore, the economic feasibility analysis of the system is carried out through appraising the net present value. Regarding the parametric analysis, the 3E criteria evaluated here exhibited more sensitivity to variation in heliostat field efficiency and helium turbine inlet temperature, respectively. Moreover, the baseline design mode demonstrated that the electricity was produced by 15.29 MW, the coefficient of performance (COP) of the cooling production unit was 0.812, and also the overall exergy efficiency and sum unit cost of products were obtained as 29.87% and 4.34 $/GJ, respectively. Likewise, for the electrical unit exergy cost of 0.05 $/kWh and cooling unit exergy cost of 0.08 $/kWh, the calculated net present value and payback period of the suggested system were correspondingly equal to 1.605×107 and 3.1 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Nedaei, Navid & Hamrang, Farzad & Farshi, L. Garousi, 2022. "Design and 3E analysis of a hybrid power plant integrated with a single-effect absorption chiller driven by a heliostat field: A case study for Doha, Qatar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pd:s0360544221026645
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221026645
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Okoroigwe, Edmund & Madhlopa, Amos, 2016. "An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 337-350.
    2. Sachdeva, Jatin & Singh, Onkar, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis of solar powered triple combined Brayton, Rankine and organic Rankine cycle for carbon free power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 765-780.
    3. Zhu, Han-Hui & Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and comparison for different direct-heated supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated into a solar thermal power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 144-157.
    4. Atif, Maimoon. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Energy and exergy analyses of solar tower power plant driven supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycles for six different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 153-167.
    5. Saghafifar, Mohammad & Gadalla, Mohamed, 2016. "Thermo-economic analysis of air bottoming cycle hybridization using heliostat field collector: A comparative analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 698-714.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mosaffa, A.H. & Garousi Farshi, L., 2022. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a novel integrated two power/cooling cogeneration system using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    2. Tariq, Shahzeb & Safder, Usman & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "Exergy-based weighted optimization and smart decision-making for renewable energy systems considering economics, reliability, risk, and environmental assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Haojin Wang & Jianyong Wang & Zhuan Liu & Haifeng Chen & Xiaoqin Liu, 2022. "Thermodynamic Analysis of a New Combined Cooling and Power System Coupled by the Kalina Cycle and Ammonia–Water Absorption Refrigeration Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Zahra Amiri & Arash Heidari & Mehdi Darbandi & Yalda Yazdani & Nima Jafari Navimipour & Mansour Esmaeilpour & Farshid Sheykhi & Mehmet Unal, 2023. "The Personal Health Applications of Machine Learning Techniques in the Internet of Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-41, August.
    5. Yan, Manli & Yao, Zhang & Nutakki, Tirumala Uday Kumar & Kumar Agrawal, Manoj & Muhammad, Taseer & Albani, Aliashim & Zhao, Zhanping, 2023. "Design and evaluation of a novel heliostat-based combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system: 3E analysis and multi-criteria optimization by response surface methodology (RSM)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Salameh, Tareq & Alkhalidi, Ammar & Hussien Rabaia, Malek Kamal & Al Swailmeen, Yaser & Alroujmah, Wared & Ibrahim, Mohamed & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Optimization and life cycle analysis of solar-powered absorption chiller designed for a small house in the United Arab Emirates using evacuated tube technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 200-212.
    7. Shakibi, Hamid & Shokri, Afshar & Assareh, Ehsanolah & Yari, Mortaza & Lee, Moonyong, 2023. "Using machine learning approaches to model and optimize a combined solar/natural gas-based power and freshwater cogeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    8. Vedran Mrzljak & Igor Poljak & Maro Jelić & Jasna Prpić-Oršić, 2023. "Thermodynamic Analysis and Improvement Potential of Helium Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant at Four Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Mardan Dezfouli, Amir Hossein & Niroozadeh, Narjes & Jahangiri, Ali, 2023. "Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel geothermal driven power generation system of combined transcritical CO2 and C5H12 ORCs coupled with LNG stream i," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    10. Paul Njock, Julbin & Thierry Sosso, Olivier & Stouffs, Pascal & Nzengwa, Robert, 2022. "A comparative energy analysis of idealized cycles using an ammonia-water mixture for combined power/cooling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amani, Madjid & Ghenaiet, Adel, 2020. "Novel hybridization of solar central receiver system with combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Cao, Yan & Habibi, Hamed & Zoghi, Mohammad & Raise, Amir, 2021. "Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and pa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Marta Muñoz & Antonio Rovira & María José Montes, 2022. "Thermodynamic cycles for solar thermal power plants: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), March.
    4. Kim, Sunjin & Cho, Yeonjoo & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2018. "Characteristics and optimization of supercritical CO2 recompression power cycle and the influence of pinch point temperature difference of recuperators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1216-1226.
    5. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    6. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    7. Merchán, R.P. & Santos, M.J. & Medina, A. & Calvo Hernández, A., 2022. "High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Kim, Sunjin & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2020. "Parametric study and optimization of closed Brayton power cycle considering the charge amount of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    11. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    12. Awan, Ahmed Bilal & Zubair, Muhammad & Chandra Mouli, Kotturu V.V., 2020. "Design, optimization and performance comparison of solar tower and photovoltaic power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Ma, Teng & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Cao, Feng, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis and performance prediction on dynamic response characteristic of PCHE in 1000 MW S-CO2 coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 123-138.
    14. Lu, Yupeng & Xuan, Yimin & Teng, Liang & Liu, Jingrui & Wang, Busheng, 2024. "A cascaded thermochemical energy storage system enabling performance enhancement of concentrated solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    15. Pantaleo, Antonio M. & Camporeale, Sergio M. & Miliozzi, Adio & Russo, Valeria & Shah, Nilay & Markides, Christos N., 2017. "Novel hybrid CSP-biomass CHP for flexible generation: Thermo-economic analysis and profitability assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 994-1006.
    16. Li, Chao & Zhai, Rongrong & Yang, Yongping & Patchigolla, Kumar & Oakey, John E. & Turner, Peter, 2019. "Annual performance analysis and optimization of a solar tower aided coal-fired power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 440-456.
    17. Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Festus Victor Bekun & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Manoj Kumar Panjwani, 2021. "Effect of Two Different Heat Transfer Fluids on the Performance of Solar Tower CSP by Comparing Recompression Supercritical CO 2 and Rankine Power Cycles, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    19. Wang, Di & Xie, Xinyan & Wang, Chaonan & Zhou, Yunlong & Yang, Mei & Li, Xiaoli & Liu, Deying, 2021. "Thermo-economic analysis on an improved coal-fired power system integrated with S–CO2 brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    20. Saghafifar, Mohammad & Gadalla, Mohamed, 2017. "Thermo-economic optimization of hybrid solar Maisotsenko bottoming cycles using heliostat field collector: Comparative analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 686-702.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pd:s0360544221026645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.