IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v218y2021ics0360544220325391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Bingham fluid viscosity on energy performances of a vortex chamber pump

Author

Listed:
  • Rogovyi, Andrii
  • Korohodskyi, Vladimir
  • Medvediev, Yevhen

Abstract

One of the problems in the development of coal-water technologies is the use of reliable and long-lasting pumps. To date, classic pumps, due to the use of mechanical moving parts and seals, are subject to rapid abrasive wear. The solution to this problem can lie in the creation of new vortex chamber pumps developed by the authors. They are highly reliable, simple in design and have no moving parts. The object of this paper consists in determining the range of vortex chamber pump performance when pumping Bingham fluids of different rheological parameters, as well as to determine the dependence of the pump efficiency on the Bingham viscosity and the yield stress. Study of the pump performance was conducted experimentally and with CFD simulation. It was found that an increase in the liquid viscosity reduces the vacuum value near the axis. For the first time it was found that the tenfold increase in plastic viscosity reduces the pump efficiency by about 20%. This results in the fact that the supercharger cannot pump the coal-water slurry with τ0>12 Pa and μB>1 Pa⋅s. The findings can be extended not only to coal-water slurry, but also to all Bingham fluids.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogovyi, Andrii & Korohodskyi, Vladimir & Medvediev, Yevhen, 2021. "Influence of Bingham fluid viscosity on energy performances of a vortex chamber pump," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:218:y:2021:i:c:s0360544220325391
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220325391
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119432?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subudhi, Sudhakar & Sen, Mihir, 2015. "Review of Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube experiments using air," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 172-178.
    2. Nancy J. Hodges & Albert N. Link, 2019. "Innovation by design," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 395-403, February.
    3. Besagni, Giorgio, 2019. "Ejectors on the cutting edge: The past, the present and the perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 998-1003.
    4. Thakare, Hitesh R. & Parekh, A.D., 2015. "Computational analysis of energy separation in counter—flow vortex tube," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 62-77.
    5. Rogovyi, A., 2018. "Energy performances of the vortex chamber supercharger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 52-60.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taras Hutsol, 2023. "European Green Deal: Improving the Efficiency of Using Planetary Hydraulic Machines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Bo & Guo, Xiangji, 2018. "Prospective applications of Ranque–Hilsch vortex tubes to sustainable energy utilization and energy efficiency improvement with energy and mass separation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 135-150.
    2. Han, Qingyang & Liu, Changchao & Xue, Haoyuan & Zhang, Hailun & Sun, Wenhui & Sun, Wenxu & Jia, Lei, 2023. "Working condition expansion and performance optimization of two-stage ejector based on optimal switching strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Knut Emil Ringstad & Krzysztof Banasiak & Åsmund Ervik & Armin Hafner, 2022. "Swirl-Bypass Nozzle for CO 2 Two-Phase Ejectors: Numerical Design Exploration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
    4. Ambedkar, P. & Dutta, T., 2023. "CFD simulation and thermodynamic analysis of energy separation in vortex tube using different inert gases at different inlet pressures and cold mass fractions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    5. Manimaran, R., 2017. "Computational analysis of flow features and energy separation in a counter-flow vortex tube based on number of inlets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 564-578.
    6. Li, Shengyu & Yan, Jia & Liu, Zhan & Yao, Yong & Li, Xianbi & Wen, Na & Zou, Guorong, 2019. "Optimization on crucial ejector geometries in a multi-evaporator refrigeration system for tropical region refrigerated trucks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. David Urbano & Andreu Turro & Sebastian Aparicio, 2020. "Innovation through R&D activities in the European context: antecedents and consequences," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1481-1504, October.
    8. Rogovyi, A., 2018. "Energy performances of the vortex chamber supercharger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 52-60.
    9. Robert Sager & Nils Hendrik Petersen & Manfred Wirsum, 2024. "A Thermodynamic-Based Black-Box Modeling Approach for the Comprehensive Analysis of Vortex Tube Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Alicia Llorca-Ponce & Gregorio Rius-Sorolla & Francisco J. Ferreiro-Seoane, 2021. "Is Innovation a Driver of Sustainability? An Analysis from a Spanish Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-30, August.
    11. Estelle Rémondeau & Patrick Cogez & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2019. "Assessing and Improving the Coverage of a Strategic Research Agenda: A Design Theory Approach," Post-Print hal-02297284, HAL.
    12. Besagni, Giorgio, 2019. "Ejectors on the cutting edge: The past, the present and the perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 998-1003.
    13. Morales-Ospino, R. & Celzard, A. & Fierro, V., 2023. "Strategies to recover and minimize boil-off losses during liquid hydrogen storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Chuan Li & Pau Rausell Köster, 2020. "Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges of European Design Policy to Enable Innovation. The Case of Designscapes Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Manimaran, R., 2016. "Computational analysis of energy separation in a counter-flow vortex tube based on inlet shape and aspect ratio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 17-28.
    16. Oberti, Raphaël & Lagrandeur, Junior & Poncet, Sébastien, 2023. "Numerical benchmark of a Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube working with subcritical carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    17. Dmytro Levchenko & Andrii Manzharov & Artem Artyukhov & Nadiya Artyukhova & Jan Krmela, 2021. "Comparative Exergy Analysis of Units for the Porous Ammonium Nitrate Granulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Metsue, Antoine & Debroeyer, Romain & Poncet, Sébastien & Bartosiewicz, Yann, 2022. "An improved thermodynamic model for supersonic real-gas ejectors using the compound-choking theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    19. Yang, Yan & Karvounis, Nikolas & Walther, Jens Honore & Ding, Hongbing & Wen, Chuang, 2021. "Effect of area ratio of the primary nozzle on steam ejector performance considering nonequilibrium condensations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Budi Harsanto & Ina Primiana & Vita Sarasi & Yayan Satyakti, 2023. "Sustainability Innovation in the Textile Industry: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:218:y:2021:i:c:s0360544220325391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.