IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v195y2020ics0360544220301092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of helically coiled gas heaters in supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles: A detailed assessment under convective boundary condition

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Yecheng
  • Zhu, Qi’an
  • Li, Zhouhang

Abstract

Helical coil has drawn increasingly attention as the gas heater of supercritical Rankine cycles due to its high heat transfer rate and compact structure. This work focused on the thermal performance of supercritical CO2 helically coiled heater at a practical thermal boundary condition (i.e. convective boundary), under which the coil’s performance has been scarcely paid attention. Supercritical flow turbulence was solved by the Shear-Stress Transport k-ω model and heat transfer was dealt with in a solid-to-fluid conjugate manner. Influence of fluid temperature, mass flux, coil curvature and buoyancy was comprehensively analyzed over a wide range. Results reveal a significant self-regulation of local heat input in the region of Tb < Tpc, where heat flux gently varied along the coil axis. The mass flux and inlet temperature of heat source fluid had a strong impact on the local heat flux, the heat transfer coefficient and the thermal inhomogeneity, while coil curvature only had a weak influence. Comparison with results under uniform heat flux boundary shows that at convective boundary the influence of buoyancy on average heat transfer was weakened in the form of reduced affecting region and intensity, and local thermal inhomogeneity caused by buoyancy and centrifugal force was also relieved. Effect of thermal boundary condition is minimal in buoyancy-negligible cases like high mass flux condition. Further evaluation identifies that several Nusselt correlations obtained at uniform heat flux were capable of predicting average heat transfer at convective boundary, with a relative error within ±20%. Local heat transfer was characterized by a dimensionless number Ψ, which has three critical values of 0.1, 1 and 10 to quantitatively identify the relative importance of buoyancy and centrifugal effects. Finally, evaluation on the system design shows that helically coiled gas heater can contribute to improved compactness, reduced investment cost and a more flexible range of operating conditions for supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Yecheng & Zhu, Qi’an & Li, Zhouhang, 2020. "Performance of helically coiled gas heaters in supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles: A detailed assessment under convective boundary condition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:195:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220301092
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220301092
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Zhouhang & Zhai, Yuling & Li, Kongzhai & Wang, Hua & Lu, Junfu, 2016. "A quantitative study on the interaction between curvature and buoyancy effects in helically coiled heat exchangers of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 661-676.
    2. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    3. Marija Lazova & Alihan Kaya & Marijn Billiet & Steven Lecompte & Dimitris Manolakos & Michel De Paepe, 2017. "Experimental Assessment of a Helical Coil Heat Exchanger Operating at Subcritical and Supercritical Conditions in a Small-Scale Solar Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "A supercritical Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat into power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 549-555.
    5. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Klimenko, A.Y., 2018. "A comprehensive review on heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics and correlations with supercritical CO2 under heating and cooling applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 658-675.
    6. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    7. Liu, Xinxin & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Liu, Chao & Bai, Wanjin & Dang, Chaobin, 2018. "Heat transfer deterioration in helically coiled heat exchangers in trans-critical CO2 Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Li, Zhouhang & Zhai, Yuling & Bi, Dapeng & Li, Kongzhai & Wang, Hua & Lu, Junfu, 2017. "Orientation effect in helical coils with smooth and rib-roughened wall: Toward improved gas heaters for supercritical carbon dioxide Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 530-545.
    9. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    10. Marija Lazova & Henk Huisseune & Alihan Kaya & Steven Lecompte & George Kosmadakis & Michel De Paepe, 2016. "Performance Evaluation of a Helical Coil Heat Exchanger Working under Supercritical Conditions in a Solar Organic Rankine Cycle Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun, Jinxiang & Zhang, Ruibo & Wang, Mingjun & Zhang, Jing & Qiu, Suizheng & Tian, Wenxi & Su, G.H., 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of helical coil steam generator in high temperature gas reactors with genetic algorithm and response surface method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Wang, Jiangtao & Zhai, Yuling & Wang, Hua & Li, Zhouhang, 2023. "Heat transfer performance of supercritical R134a in a U-bend vapor generator for transcritical ORC system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Wang, Yuan & Ren, Jing-Jie & Bi, Ming-Shu, 2023. "Analysis on the heat transfer performance of supercritical liquified natural gas in horizontal tubes during regasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Shijie & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Liu, Chao & Dang, Chaobin, 2020. "A review on application and heat transfer enhancement of supercritical CO2 in low-grade heat conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    2. Zhang, Shijie & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Liu, Chao & Liu, Xinxin & Zhang, Yadong & Dang, Chaobin, 2019. "The heat transfer of supercritical CO2 in helically coiled tube: Trade-off between curvature and buoyancy effect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 765-777.
    3. Li, Zhouhang & Tang, Guoli & Wu, Yuxin & Zhai, Yuling & Xu, Jianxin & Wang, Hua & Lu, Junfu, 2016. "Improved gas heaters for supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles: Considerations on forced and mixed convection heat transfer enhancement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 126-141.
    4. Xinxin Liu & Shuoshuo Li & Liang Liu & Chao He & Zhuang Sun & Faruk Özdemir & Muhammad Aziz & Po-Chih Kuo, 2022. "Research Progress on Convective Heat Transfer Characteristics of Supercritical Fluids in Curved Tube," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    6. Yu, Haoshui & Gundersen, Truls & Feng, Xiao, 2018. "Process integration of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and heat pump for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 330-340.
    7. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    8. Dai, Baomin & Li, Minxia & Ma, Yitai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide blends with low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 942-952.
    9. Antonelli, Marco & Martorano, Luigi, 2012. "A study on the rotary steam engine for distributed generation in small size power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 642-647.
    10. Liu, Chao & He, Chao & Gao, Hong & Xie, Hui & Li, Yourong & Wu, Shuangying & Xu, Jinliang, 2013. "The environmental impact of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery through life-cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 144-154.
    11. Zhang, Ji & Zhang, Xiaomeng & Zhang, Zhixiang & Zhou, Peilin & Zhang, Yan & Yuan, Han, 2022. "Performance improvement of ocean thermal energy conversion organic Rankine cycle under temperature glide effect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    12. Zhang, Lijun & Chennells, Michael & Xia, Xiaohua, 2018. "A power dispatch model for a ferrochrome plant heat recovery cogeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 180-189.
    13. Ge, Y.T. & Li, L. & Luo, X. & Tassou, S.A., 2018. "Performance evaluation of a low-grade power generation system with CO2 transcritical power cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 220-230.
    14. Hong Gao & Chao Liu & Chao He & Xiaoxiao Xu & Shuangying Wu & Yourong Li, 2012. "Performance Analysis and Working Fluid Selection of a Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle for Low Grade Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Aliaga, D.M. & Romero, C.P. & Feick, R. & Brooks, W.K. & Campbell, A.N., 2024. "Modelling and simulation of a novel liquid air energy storage system with a liquid piston, NH3 and CO2 cycles for enhanced heat and cold utilisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    16. Lee, Ung & Kim, Kyeongsu & Han, Chonghun, 2014. "Design and optimization of multi-component organic rankine cycle using liquefied natural gas cryogenic exergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 520-532.
    17. Cui, Xinying & Guo, Jiangfeng & Huai, Xiulan & Zhang, Haiyan & Cheng, Keyong & Zhou, Jingzhi, 2019. "Numerical investigations on serpentine channel for supercritical CO2 recuperator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 517-530.
    18. Moloney, Francesca & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Goswami, D.Y., 2020. "Working fluid parametric analysis for recuperative supercritical organic Rankine cycles for medium geothermal reservoir temperatures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2874-2881.
    19. Jianguo Yan & Shouchun Liu & Pengcheng Guo & Qincheng Bi, 2020. "Experiments on Heat Transfer of Supercritical Pressure Kerosene in Mini Tube under Ultra-High Heat Fluxes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:195:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220301092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.