IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v195y2020ics0360544220300724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The energy-saving mechanism of coal-fired power plant with S–CO2 cycle compared to steam-Rankine cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Zhewen
  • Wang, Yanjuan
  • Zhang, Xiaosong
  • Xu, Jinliang

Abstract

S–CO2 (Supercritical-CO2) coal-fired power plant is a promising technology for efficient and clean utilization of coal for power generation. The comparative study between the S–CO2 coal-fired power plant and the power plant with steam Rankine cycle from aspects of energy and exergy balances is conducted. The conversion and transfer of the energy and exergy in the power plants are revealed. With the main gas parameters of 32MPa/620 °C and double-reheat process, the power generation efficiencies of the S–CO2 coal-fired power plant and the power plant with steam Rankine cycle are 49.06% and 48.12%, respectively. The corresponding exergy efficiencies are 48.02% and 47.10%, respectively. The energy-saving mechanism of the S–CO2 coal-fired power plant is revealed: the smaller boiler efficiency and larger exergy efficiency of the boiler system in the S–CO2 coal-fired power plant make the energy level of the energy being transferred to the S–CO2 cycle is higher than that of the energy being transported to the Rankine cycle. The CO2 absorbs the high-level energy and produces more mechanical power through the S–CO2 cycle to obtain higher power efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Zhewen & Wang, Yanjuan & Zhang, Xiaosong & Xu, Jinliang, 2020. "The energy-saving mechanism of coal-fired power plant with S–CO2 cycle compared to steam-Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:195:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220300724
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220300724
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    2. Zhao, Zhigang & Su, Sheng & Si, Ningning & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Xu, Jun & Jiang, Long & Chen, Gang & Xiang, Jun, 2017. "Exergy analysis of the turbine system in a 1000 MW double reheat ultra-supercritical power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 540-548.
    3. Mecheri, Mounir & Le Moullec, Yann, 2016. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for coal-fired power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 758-771.
    4. Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Han, Wanlong & Bai, Wengang & Yang, Yu & Yao, Mingyu & Wang, Yueming, 2018. "Improved design of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle for coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Chen, Wenying & Xu, Ruina, 2010. "Clean coal technology development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2123-2130, May.
    6. Iverson, Brian D. & Conboy, Thomas M. & Pasch, James J. & Kruizenga, Alan M., 2013. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 957-970.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tong, Yongjing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Ming & Pang, Liping, 2022. "Design optimization of a new supercritical CO2 single reheat coal-fired power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    2. Wang, Di & Xie, Xinyan & Wang, Chaonan & Zhou, Yunlong & Yang, Mei & Li, Xiaoli & Liu, Deying, 2021. "Thermo-economic analysis on an improved coal-fired power system integrated with S–CO2 brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Xiao, Kun & Yu, Bolin & Cheng, Lei & Li, Fei & Fang, Debin, 2022. "The effects of CCUS combined with renewable energy penetration under the carbon peak by an SD-CGE model: Evidence from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    4. Zhang, Xuelei & Zhang, Zhuoyuan & Wang, Gaofeng, 2023. "Thermodynamic and economic investigation of a novel combined cycle in coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture via Ca-looping," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    5. Chen, Zhewen & Wang, Yanjuan & Zhang, Xiaosong, 2020. "Energy and exergy analyses of S–CO2 coal-fired power plant with reheating processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Mei, Weiguang & Zhai, Rongrong & Zhao, Yingxin & Yao, Zhiqiang & Ma, Ning, 2024. "Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization using NSGA-II in a novel dual-stage Selexol process of integrated gasification combined cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Shengpeng & Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Yao, Mingyu & Peng, Botao & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Thermohydrodynamic analysis of the vertical gas wall and reheat gas wall in a 300 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Yifan & Yao, Mingyu & Yang, Yu & Han, Wanlong & Bai, Wengang, 2019. "Design assessment of a 5 MW fossil-fired supercritical CO2 power cycle pilot loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 792-804.
    3. Xu, Cheng & Zhang, Qiang & Yang, Zhiping & Li, Xiaosa & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "An improved supercritical coal-fired power generation system incorporating a supplementary supercritical CO2 cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1319-1329.
    4. Liu, Zecheng & Zhong, Wenqi & Shao, Yingjuan & Liu, Xuejiao, 2020. "Exergy analysis of supercritical CO2 coal-fired circulating fluidized bed boiler system based on the combustion process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Zhou, Jing & Zhu, Meng & Su, Sheng & Chen, Lei & Xu, Jun & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Jiang, Long & Zhong, Wenqi & Xiang, Jun, 2020. "Numerical analysis and modified thermodynamic calculation methods for the furnace in the 1000 MW supercritical CO2 coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Yang, D.L. & Tang, G.H. & Fan, Y.H. & Li, X.L. & Wang, S.Q., 2020. "Arrangement and three-dimensional analysis of cooling wall in 1000 MW S–CO2 coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Lei & Zhang, Yifan & Yang, Yu & Zhang, Chun & Yao, Mingyu, 2021. "Energy and exergy analyses of an improved recompression supercritical CO2 cycle for coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Li, Zhaozhi & Shao, Yingjuan & Zhong, Wenqi & Liu, Hao, 2023. "Optimal design and thermodynamic evaluation of supercritical CO2 oxy-coal circulating fluidized bed power generation systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    9. Zhou, Jing & Zhu, Meng & Xu, Kai & Su, Sheng & Tang, Yifang & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Xu, Jun & He, Limo & Xiang, Jun, 2020. "Key issues and innovative double-tangential circular boiler configurations for the 1000 MW coal-fired supercritical carbon dioxide power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Gu, Mingyan & Wang, Mingming & Chen, Xue & Wang, Jimin & Lin, Yuyu & Chu, Huaqiang, 2019. "Numerical study on the effect of separated over-fire air ratio on combustion characteristics and NOx emission in a 1000 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 593-603.
    11. Liu, Xuejiao & Zhong, Wenqi & Li, Pingjiao & Xiang, Jun & Liu, Guoyao, 2019. "Design and performance analysis of coal-fired fluidized bed for supercritical CO2 power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 468-478.
    12. Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Li, Kailun & Yang, Yu & Zhou, Yujia & Zhang, Xuwei & Xu, Ruina & Zhuge, Weilin & Lei, Xianliang & Dan, Guangju, 2022. "Dynamic characteristics and control strategies of the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle tailored for the new generation concentrating solar power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    13. Fan, Y.H. & Yang, D.L. & Tang, G.H. & Sheng, Q. & Li, X.L., 2022. "Design of S–CO2 coal-fired power system based on the multiscale analysis platform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    14. Gao, Lei & Cao, Tao & Hwang, Yunho & Radermacher, Reinhard, 2022. "Robustness analysis in supercritical CO2 power generation system configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    15. Ma, Teng & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Cao, Feng, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis and performance prediction on dynamic response characteristic of PCHE in 1000 MW S-CO2 coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 123-138.
    16. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    17. Tong, Yongjing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Ming & Pang, Liping, 2022. "Design optimization of a new supercritical CO2 single reheat coal-fired power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    18. Wang, Di & Xie, Xinyan & Wang, Chaonan & Zhou, Yunlong & Yang, Mei & Li, Xiaoli & Liu, Deying, 2021. "Thermo-economic analysis on an improved coal-fired power system integrated with S–CO2 brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    19. Santini, Lorenzo & Accornero, Carlo & Cioncolini, Andrea, 2016. "On the adoption of carbon dioxide thermodynamic cycles for nuclear power conversion: A case study applied to Mochovce 3 Nuclear Power Plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 446-463.
    20. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Kelsall, Greg, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and preliminary design of closed Brayton cycle using nitrogen as working fluid and coupled to small modular Sodium-cooled fast reactor (SM-SFR)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 436-453.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:195:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220300724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.