IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v188y2019ics0360544219317165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CT coreflood study of foam flow for enhanced oil recovery: The effect of oil type and saturation

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Jinyu
  • Vincent-Bonnieu, Sebastien
  • Rossen, William R.

Abstract

We present a CT coreflood study of foam, both pre-generated and generated in-situ, displacing oil, as a function of oil type and saturation. Foam generation and propagation are reflected through sectional pressure measurements. Dual-energy CT imaging monitors in-time phase saturations. With an oil less harmful to foam (hexadecane), injection with and without pre-generation of foam exhibits similarities: propagation of a foam bank through a core and later refinement of foam texture. In contrast, with an oil destabilizing to foam (with 20 wt% oleic acid in the hexadecane), pre-generation of foam behaves very differently from co-injection, suggesting very-different effects on foam generation and propagation. Without pre-generation, strong-foam generation is very difficult even at residual oil saturation (about 0.1); generation finally starts from the outlet (likely a result of the capillary-end effect). This strong-foam state propagates upstream very slowly. Pre-generated foam shows two stages of propagation, both from the inlet to outlet. First, weak foam displaces most of the oil, followed by a propagation of stronger foam at lower oil saturation. This dependence on injection method with harmful oil is not represented in currently applied foam models, which need further improvements for reliable prediction of foam for enhanced oil recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Jinyu & Vincent-Bonnieu, Sebastien & Rossen, William R., 2019. "CT coreflood study of foam flow for enhanced oil recovery: The effect of oil type and saturation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219317165
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219317165
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zuloaga, Pavel & Yu, Wei & Miao, Jijun & Sepehrnoori, Kamy, 2017. "Performance evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff and continuous CO2 injection in tight oil reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 181-192.
    2. van Bergen, F. & Gale, J. & Damen, K.J. & Wildenborg, A.F.B., 2004. "Worldwide selection of early opportunities for CO2-enhanced oil recovery and CO2-enhanced coal bed methane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1611-1621.
    3. Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2019. "Reservoir simulation of carbon storage associated with CO2 EOR in residual oil zones, San Andres formation of West Texas, Permian Basin, USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 391-401.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ping Yue & Feng Liu & Kai Yang & Chunshuo Han & Chao Ren & Jiangtang Zhou & Xiukun Wang & Quantang Fang & Xinxin Li & Liangbin Dou, 2022. "Micro-Displacement and Storage Mechanism of CO 2 in Tight Sandstone Reservoirs Based on CT Scanning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Ayomikun Bello & Anastasia Ivanova & Alexey Cheremisin, 2023. "Foam EOR as an Optimization Technique for Gas EOR: A Comprehensive Review of Laboratory and Field Implementations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-52, January.
    3. Wu, Qianhui & Ding, Lei & Zhang, Lei & Ge, Jijiang & Rahman, Mohammad Azizur & Economou, Ioannis G. & Guérillot, Dominique, 2023. "Polymer enhanced foam for improving oil recovery in oil-wet carbonate reservoirs: A proof of concept and insights into the polymer-surfactant interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Hanamertani, Alvinda Sri & Ahmed, Shehzad, 2021. "Probing the role of associative polymer on scCO2-Foam strength and rheology enhancement in bulk and porous media for improving oil displacement efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Ahmadi, Ali & Manshad, Abbas Khaksar & Akbari, Majid & Ali, Jagar A. & Jaf, Pshtiwan T. & Abdulrahman, Ahmed Fattah, 2024. "Nano-stabilized foam for enhanced oil recovery using green nanocomposites and anionic surfactants: An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, H.D. & Chen, Y. & Ma, G.W., 2020. "Effects of capillary pressures on two-phase flow of immiscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery in fractured media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Chaturvedi, Krishna Raghav & Trivedi, Japan & Sharma, Tushar, 2020. "Single-step silica nanofluid for improved carbon dioxide flow and reduced formation damage in porous media for carbon utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Xiao, Caiyun & Ni, Hongjian & Shi, Xian, 2022. "Unsteady model for wellbore pressure transmission of carbon dioxide fracturing considering limited-flow outlet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    4. Fengshuang Du & Bahareh Nojabaei, 2019. "A Review of Gas Injection in Shale Reservoirs: Enhanced Oil/Gas Recovery Approaches and Greenhouse Gas Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-33, June.
    5. Chang, Yuan & Gao, Siqi & Ma, Qian & Wei, Ying & Li, Guoping, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and utilization technologies and implications for China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Chen, Bailian & Pawar, Rajesh J., 2019. "Characterization of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery in residual oil zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 291-304.
    7. Ren, Jitian & Xiao, Wenlian & Pu, Wanfen & Tang, Yanbing & Bernabé, Yves & Cheng, Qianrui & Zheng, Lingli, 2024. "Characterization of CO2 miscible/immiscible flooding in low-permeability sandstones using NMR and the VOF simulation method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    8. Cheng Cao & Hejuan Liu & Zhengmeng Hou & Faisal Mehmood & Jianxing Liao & Wentao Feng, 2020. "A Review of CO 2 Storage in View of Safety and Cost-Effectiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-45, January.
    9. Buttinelli, M. & Procesi, M. & Cantucci, B. & Quattrocchi, F. & Boschi, E., 2011. "The geo-database of caprock quality and deep saline aquifers distribution for geological storage of CO2 in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2968-2983.
    10. Fan, Chaojun & Elsworth, Derek & Li, Sheng & Zhou, Lijun & Yang, Zhenhua & Song, Yu, 2019. "Thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical couplings controlling CH4 production and CO2 sequestration in enhanced coalbed methane recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1054-1077.
    11. Yang, Lin & Zhang, Xian & McAlinden, Karl J., 2016. "The effect of trust on people's acceptance of CCS (carbon capture and storage) technologies: Evidence from a survey in the People's Republic of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 69-79.
    12. Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2021. "Maximizing oil production from water alternating gas (CO2) injection into residual oil zones: The impact of oil saturation and heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Amirsardari, Mahdi & Afsari, Khalil, 2024. "Pore-to-field scale modeling of residual gas trapping in tight carbonate underground gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    14. Hao, Yongmao & Li, Zongfa & Su, Yuliang & Kong, Chuixian & Chen, Hong & Meng, Yang, 2022. "Experimental investigation of CO2 storage and oil production of different CO2 injection methods at pore-scale and core-scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    15. Bobo Zheng & Jiuping Xu, 2014. "Carbon Capture and Storage Development Trends from a Techno-Paradigm Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    16. Yang, Mingyang & Huang, Shijun & Zhao, Fenglan & Sun, Haoyue & Chen, Xinyang, 2024. "Experimental investigation of CO2 huff-n-puff in tight oil reservoirs: Effects of the fracture on the dynamic transport characteristics based on the nuclear magnetic resonance and fractal theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    17. Alirza Orujov & Kipp Coddington & Saman A. Aryana, 2023. "A Review of CCUS in the Context of Foams, Regulatory Frameworks and Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-41, April.
    18. Rui Song & Ping Zhang & Xiaomin Tian & Famu Huang & Zhiwen Li & Jianjun Liu, 2022. "Study on Critical Drawdown Pressure of Sanding for Wellbore of Underground Gas Storage in a Depleted Gas Reservoir," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Lin, Zeyu & Lu, Xinqian & Wang, Xiaoyan & Chang, Yuanhao & Kang, Kai & Zeng, Fanhua, 2024. "Effect of N2 impurity on CO2-based cyclic solvent injection process in enhancing heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    20. Xiongwen Chen, 2014. "A Case Study of Monitoring Emission from CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery by Remote Sensing Data," Energy and Environment Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(3), pages 1-33, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219317165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.