IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v183y2019icp599-605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal operation strategy of green supply chain based on waste heat recovery quality

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Jing
  • Zhang, Zhiyong
  • Yang, Mingwan
  • Chen, Jiayu

Abstract

Recovering wasted heat is sustainable and cost-effective approach to secure energy supply in cities. This paper extended the Stackelberg game model to investigating the supply chain of the waste heat recovery market. Three models were proposed to investigate the optimal decision-making for different supply chain participants. With a validation case, the results suggested that the joint decision can reach the optimal outcomes and cost. Mobile heating strategy has advantages over coal-fired boilers, electric boilers, natural gas boilers in terms of costs and environmental protection. With a typical consumption of the recovered waste heat 342 GJ/day for water heating (from 25 °C to 60 °C) can save 11.672t standard coal and 79,800 RMB per day. In addition, improving thermal energy quality of waste heat recovery can generate higher profit and attract more potential customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Jing & Zhang, Zhiyong & Yang, Mingwan & Chen, Jiayu, 2019. "Optimal operation strategy of green supply chain based on waste heat recovery quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 599-605.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:599-605
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421931237X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singer, Marcos & Donoso, Patricio & Traverso, Pedro, 2003. "Quality strategies in supply chain alliances of disposable items," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 499-509, December.
    2. Yang, Dong-xiao & Chen, Zi-yue & Nie, Pu-yan, 2016. "Output subsidy of renewable energy power industry under asymmetric information," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P1), pages 291-299.
    3. Brückner, Sarah & Liu, Selina & Miró, Laia & Radspieler, Michael & Cabeza, Luisa F. & Lävemann, Eberhard, 2015. "Industrial waste heat recovery technologies: An economic analysis of heat transformation technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 157-167.
    4. Wiser, Ryan & Millstein, Dev & Mai, Trieu & Macknick, Jordan & Carpenter, Alberta & Cohen, Stuart & Cole, Wesley & Frew, Bethany & Heath, Garvin, 2016. "The environmental and public health benefits of achieving high penetrations of solar energy in the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 472-486.
    5. Shabani, Nazanin & Sowlati, Taraneh & Ouhimmou, Mustapha & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2014. "Tactical supply chain planning for a forest biomass power plant under supply uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 346-355.
    6. Rahman, Shams & Subramanian, Nachiappan, 2012. "Factors for implementing end-of-life computer recycling operations in reverse supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 239-248.
    7. Dobos, Imre & Richter, Knut, 2006. "A production/recycling model with quality consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 571-579, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoli Zhang & Guoyi Xiu & Fakhar Shahzad & Caiquan Duan, 2021. "The Impact of Equity Financing on the Performance of Capital-Constrained Supply Chain under Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Long, Rui & Zhao, Yanan & Luo, Zuoqing & Li, Lei & Liu, Zhichun & Liu, Wei, 2020. "Alternative thermal regenerative osmotic heat engines for low-grade heat harvesting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Xiaoli Guo & Weili Xia & Taiwen Feng & Hongyan Sheng, 2022. "Sustainable supply chain finance adoption and firm performance: Is green supply chain integration a missing link?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1135-1154, October.
    4. Yang, Jing & Zhang, Zhiyong & Hong, Ming & Yang, Mingwan & Chen, Jiayu, 2020. "An oligarchy game model for the mobile waste heat recovery energy supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    5. Chen, Jianxin & Zheng, Junhao & Zhang, Tonghua & Hou, Rui & Zhou, Yong-wu, 2022. "Dynamical complexity of pricing and green level for a dyadic supply chain with capital constraint," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1-21.
    6. Haiyan Shan & Chen Zhang & Guo Wei, 2020. "Bundling or Unbundling? Pricing Strategy for Complementary Products in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dehghani, Ehsan & Jabalameli, Mohammad Saeed & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2018. "Robust design and optimization of solar photovoltaic supply chain in an uncertain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 139-156.
    2. Zhichao Zhang & Qing Zhang & Zhi Liu & Xiaoxue Zheng, 2018. "Static and Dynamic Pricing Strategies in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Reference Quality Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, January.
    3. Kovačić, Danijel & Usenik, Janez & Bogataj, Marija, 2017. "Optimal decisions on investments in Urban Energy Cogeneration plants – Extended MRP and fuzzy approach to the stochastic systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 583-595.
    4. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Romo-De-La-Cruz, Cesar-Octavio & Chen, Yun & Liang, Liang & Paredes-Navia, Sergio A. & Wong-Ng, Winnie K. & Song, Xueyan, 2023. "Entering new era of thermoelectric oxide ceramics with high power factor through designing grain boundaries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Pili, Roberto & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Jiménez-Arreola, Manuel & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2019. "Simulation of Organic Rankine Cycle – Quasi-steady state vs dynamic approach for optimal economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 619-640.
    7. Kumar, Pankaj & Brar, S.K. & Pandove, Gulab & Aulakh, C.S., 2021. "Bioformulation of Azotobacter spp. and Streptomyces badius on the productivity, economics and energetics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    8. Miguel Castro Oliveira & Muriel Iten & Pedro L. Cruz & Helena Monteiro, 2020. "Review on Energy Efficiency Progresses, Technologies and Strategies in the Ceramic Sector Focusing on Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Ahmed S. Alahmed & Lang Tong, 2022. "Integrating Distributed Energy Resources: Optimal Prosumer Decisions and Impacts of Net Metering Tariffs," Papers 2204.06115, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    10. Yue Tan & Chunxiang Guo, 2019. "Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Alva, Guruprasad & Lin, Yaxue & Fang, Guiyin, 2018. "An overview of thermal energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 341-378.
    12. Yushchenko, Alisa & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: How to better understand and improve from multiple stakeholder perspectives?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 538-550.
    13. Zhishuang Zhu & Hua Liao, 2019. "Do subsidies improve the financial performance of renewable energy companies? Evidence from China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 95(1), pages 241-256, January.
    14. Chen, Ziyue & Huang, Lizhen, 2021. "Digital twins for information-sharing in remanufacturing supply chain: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Gandomi, Amir & Zolfaghari, Saeed, 2018. "To tier or not to tier: An analysis of multitier loyalty programs׳ optimality conditions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-36.
    16. Yan Xu & Chung-Hsing Yeh, 2017. "Sustainability-based selection decisions for e-waste recycling operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 531-552, January.
    17. Craig, Michael T. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Williams, Nathaniel J. & Severnini, Edson, 2018. "A retrospective analysis of the market price response to distributed photovoltaic generation in California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 394-403.
    18. Vaclav Novotny & David J. Szucs & Jan Špale & Hung-Yin Tsai & Michal Kolovratnik, 2021. "Absorption Power and Cooling Combined Cycle with an Aqueous Salt Solution as a Working Fluid and a Technically Feasible Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Sosa, Amanda & Acuna, Mauricio & McDonnell, Kevin & Devlin, Ger, 2015. "Managing the moisture content of wood biomass for the optimisation of Ireland's transport supply strategy to bioenergy markets and competing industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 354-368.
    20. James McCall & James Macdonald & Robin Burton & Jordan Macknick, 2023. "Vegetation Management Cost and Maintenance Implications of Different Ground Covers at Utility-Scale Solar Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:599-605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.