IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v183y2017ipbp583-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal decisions on investments in Urban Energy Cogeneration plants – Extended MRP and fuzzy approach to the stochastic systems

Author

Listed:
  • Kovačić, Danijel
  • Usenik, Janez
  • Bogataj, Marija

Abstract

The issue of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) management is an ever increasing problem, especially because solid waste from industry and other Closed-loop Supply Chain Waste (CLSCW) is included in MSW. Dealing with very large amounts of MSW per capita is a global problem, forcing municipalities and industry to develop new systemic approaches and technological solutions. One of the well-accepted solutions is energy recovery from MSW and CLSCW. The Waste-to-Energy (WTE) policy significantly reduces the volume of waste disposed in landfills, influences the reduction of total greenhouse gas emissions, and gives the potential for generating electricity or developing co-generation of electricity and heat. Nevertheless, there are still high uncertainties regarding the optimal decision on investments in cogeneration plants. In this paper we shall not discuss the technical characteristics of plants. Our focus is on the choices regarding investment costs and efficiency which also depend on the uncertain demand for supply system products, which is in correlation with the quantity of waste. In general, the recovered items must be distributed from the recycling facility back to production, and waste items must be sent to landfills, for which taxes and fees have to be paid. Alternatively, waste items can be reversibly used as a source of energy with several technological methods – most commonly the burning process. The uncertain energy efficiency of cogeneration plants and the uncertainty of demand appear simultaneously. In this paper, the methods for supporting decisions in optimal investment or co-investment in the urban cogeneration plant in case of joint actions of local authorities responsible for MSW and CLSC managers is considered when energy efficiency is normally distributed or fuzzy, at volatile demand, which has never been studied jointly. Extended MRP theoretical results are compared to the solutions of fuzzy reasoning. We show how MRP Theory can be used for evaluating the investments, but also how fuzzy reasoning is losing its potential in case of lower demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Kovačić, Danijel & Usenik, Janez & Bogataj, Marija, 2017. "Optimal decisions on investments in Urban Energy Cogeneration plants – Extended MRP and fuzzy approach to the stochastic systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 583-595.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:183:y:2017:i:pb:p:583-595
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527316000608
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A sustainable EOQ model: Theoretical formulation and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-153.
    2. Singer, Marcos & Donoso, Patricio & Traverso, Pedro, 2003. "Quality strategies in supply chain alliances of disposable items," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 499-509, December.
    3. Danijel Kovačić & Marija Bogataj, 2013. "Reverse logistics facility location using cyclical model of extended MRP theory," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(1), pages 41-57, June.
    4. Richter, Knut & Weber, Jens, 2001. "The reverse Wagner/Whitin model with variable manufacturing and remanufacturing cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-3), pages 447-456, May.
    5. Richter, Knut, 1996. "The extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 443-447, August.
    6. Radulovic, Dusko & Skok, Srdjan & Kirincic, Vedran, 2012. "Cogeneration – Investment dilemma," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 177-187.
    7. Richter, Knut & Dobos, Imre, 1999. "Analysis of the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem with integer setup numbers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 463-467, March.
    8. Bogataj, Marija & Grubbström, Robert W. & Bogataj, Ludvik, 2011. "Efficient location of industrial activity cells in a global supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 243-250, September.
    9. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Bogataj, Marija & Grubbström, Robert W., 2013. "Transportation delays in reverse logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 395-402.
    11. Bogataj, Marija & Grubbström, Robert W., 2012. "On the representation of timing for different structures within MRP theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 749-755.
    12. Dobos, Imre & Richter, Knut, 2004. "An extended production/recycling model with stationary demand and return rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 311-323, August.
    13. Dobos, Imre & Richter, Knut, 2006. "A production/recycling model with quality consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 571-579, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Wenyi & Kucukyazici, Beste & Saenz, Maria Jesus, 2019. "On the joint dynamics of the economic and environmental performances for collective take-back systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 228-244.
    2. Allevi, Elisabetta & Gnudi, Adriana & Konnov, Igor V. & Oggioni, Giorgia, 2021. "Municipal solid waste management in circular economy: A sequential optimization model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Bogataj, David & Bogataj, Marija & Hudoklin, Domen, 2017. "Reprint of “Mitigating risks of perishable products in the cyber-physical systems based on the extended MRP model”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 113-125.
    4. Bogataj, David & Bogataj, Marija & Hudoklin, Domen, 2017. "Mitigating risks of perishable products in the cyber-physical systems based on the extended MRP model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 51-62.
    5. Sarkar, Biswajit & Guchhait, Rekha & Sarkar, Mitali & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2019. "How does an industry manage the optimum cash flow within a smart production system with the carbon footprint and carbon emission under logistics framework?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 243-257.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & El Saadany, Ahmed M.A., 2009. "The production, remanufacture and waste disposal model with lost sales," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 115-124, July.
    2. Sumit Maheshwari & Amrina Kausar & Ahmad Hasan & Chandra K. Jaggi, 2023. "Sustainable inventory model for a three-layer supply chain using optimal waste management," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 216-235, March.
    3. Adel A. Alamri, 2023. "A Sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chains Inventory Model Considering Optimal Number of Remanufacturing Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Bogataj, David & Bogataj, Marija & Hudoklin, Domen, 2017. "Reprint of “Mitigating risks of perishable products in the cyber-physical systems based on the extended MRP model”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 113-125.
    5. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Rosen, Marc A., 2008. "The economic order quantity repair and waste disposal model with entropy cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 109-120, July.
    6. Ullah, Mehran & Sarkar, Biswajit, 2020. "Recovery-channel selection in a hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing production model with RFID and product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 360-374.
    7. El Saadany, Ahmed M.A. & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2011. "A production/remanufacture model with returns' subassemblies managed differently," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 119-126, September.
    8. Bogataj, David & Battini, Daria & Calzavara, Martina & Persona, Alessandro, 2019. "The ageing workforce challenge: Investments in collaborative robots or contribution to pension schemes, from the multi-echelon perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 97-106.
    9. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Moshtagh, Mohammad Sadegh, 2019. "A consignment stock scheme for closed loop supply chain with imperfect manufacturing processes, lost sales, and quality dependent return: Multi Levels Structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 298-316.
    10. Lucas Dias Condeixa & Pierry Silva & Diego Moah & Brenda Farias & Adriana Leiras, 2022. "Evaluating cost impacts on reverse logistics using an Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model with environmental and social considerations," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 921-940, September.
    11. Omar, Mohd & Yeo, Ivan, 2009. "A model for a production-repair system under a time-varying demand process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 17-23, May.
    12. Danijel Kovačić & Eloy Hontoria & Lorenzo Ros-McDonnell & Marija Bogataj, 2015. "Location and lead-time perturbations in multi-level assembly systems of perishable goods in Spanish baby food logistics," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(3), pages 607-623, September.
    13. El Saadany, Ahmed M.A. & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2013. "How many times to remanufacture?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 598-604.
    14. Bimal Kumar Mawandiya & J. K. Jha & Jitesh J. Thakkar, 2020. "Optimal production-inventory policy for closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing under random demand and return," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1623-1664, September.
    15. Dobos, Imre & Richter, Knut, 2004. "An extended production/recycling model with stationary demand and return rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 311-323, August.
    16. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & El Saadany, Ahmed M.A., 2011. "An economic production and remanufacturing model with learning effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 115-127, May.
    17. Sarkar, Biswajit & Guchhait, Rekha & Sarkar, Mitali & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2019. "How does an industry manage the optimum cash flow within a smart production system with the carbon footprint and carbon emission under logistics framework?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 243-257.
    18. Bogataj, David & Bogataj, Marija & Hudoklin, Domen, 2017. "Mitigating risks of perishable products in the cyber-physical systems based on the extended MRP model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 51-62.
    19. Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Richter, Knut, 2016. "A general production and recovery EOQ model with stationary demand and return rates," Discussion Papers 378, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.
    20. Konstantaras, I. & Papachristos, S., 2007. "Optimal policy and holding cost stability regions in a periodic review inventory system with manufacturing and remanufacturing options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 433-448, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:183:y:2017:i:pb:p:583-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.