IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v176y2019icp211-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disturbance modelling through steady-state value deviations: The determination of suitable energy indicators and parameters for energy consumption monitoring in a typical sugar mill

Author

Listed:
  • Mkwananzi, Thobeka
  • Mandegari, Mohsen
  • Görgens, Johann F.

Abstract

The growing emphasis in alternative revenue streams, from the conversion of sugarcane bagasse into energy co-products has prompted a desire by the sugar factories to achieve higher levels of energy efficiency. This study presents a comprehensive overview of the parameters whose steady-state deviation leads to excess energy use in sugar mills. The effect of eight operating parameters on the defined energy indicators was investigated, using a MATLAB simulation of a 250-tonne per hour sugar mill. The captured energy trends were used to develop energy prediction models based on the parameters whose steady-state offsets resulted in excess energy use. High prediction accuracies of over 95% were obtained when the developed energy prediction models were validated for seasonal cane quality and evaporator heat transfer coefficient variations. Increased A-massecuite recycling had a more pronounced effect on the energy used per kilogramme of water in the evaporator unit as compared to the crystallisation unit. Of the eight parameters, elevated imbibition water use and A-massecuite recycling had a cumulative percentage effect of 79% on the overall steam used per tonne of cane and sugar produced. Hence increasing the syrup concentration, decreasing imbibition water use and massecuite recycling are preferred operational strategies for improved energy-efficiency in a sugar mill. Overall, this study strengthens the existing literature by illustrating an approach for developing suitable energy indicators for excess energy use monitoring in sugarcane mills.

Suggested Citation

  • Mkwananzi, Thobeka & Mandegari, Mohsen & Görgens, Johann F., 2019. "Disturbance modelling through steady-state value deviations: The determination of suitable energy indicators and parameters for energy consumption monitoring in a typical sugar mill," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 211-223.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:176:y:2019:i:c:p:211-223
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219306115
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hevert, Herbert W. & Hevert, Stephen C., 1980. "Second law analysis: An alternative indicator of system efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 5(8), pages 865-873.
    2. Guido Colombo & William Ocampo-Duque & Fabio Rinaldi, 2014. "Challenges in Bioenergy Production from Sugarcane Mills in Developing Countries: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Abeykoon, Chamil & Kelly, Adrian L. & Vera-Sorroche, Javier & Brown, Elaine C. & Coates, Phil D. & Deng, Jing & Li, Kang & Harkin-Jones, Eileen & Price, Mark, 2014. "Process efficiency in polymer extrusion: Correlation between the energy demand and melt thermal stability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 560-571.
    4. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Mandegari, Mohsen & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Farzad, Somayeh & Mojarab Soufiyan, Mohamad & Görgens, Johann F., 2018. "Exergy analysis of a lignocellulosic-based biorefinery annexed to a sugarcane mill for simultaneous lactic acid and electricity production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 623-638.
    5. Gale A. Boyd, 2005. "A Method for Measuring the Efficiency Gap between Average and Best Practice Energy Use: The ENERGY STAR Industrial Energy Performance Indicator," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(3), pages 51-65, July.
    6. Dogbe, Eunice Sefakor & Mandegari, Mohsen A. & Görgens, Johann F., 2018. "Exergetic diagnosis and performance analysis of a typical sugar mill based on Aspen Plus® simulation of the process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 614-625.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Park, Young-Kwon & Fallahi, Alireza & Sulaiman, Alawi & Ranjbari, Meisam & Rahnama, Hassan & Aghbashl, 2022. "Environmental life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Douglas, Sean & Murphy, Fionnuala, 2023. "Techno-economic potentials of integrating decentralised biomethane production systems into existing natural gas grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Li, Ming-Jia & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2017. "Review of methodologies and polices for evaluation of energy efficiency in high energy-consuming industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 203-215.
    3. Chung, Millicent Rosette Wan Yi & Tan, Inn Shi & Foo, Henry Chee Yew & Lam, Man Kee, 2022. "Exergy analysis of a biorefinery process for co-production of third-generation L-lactic acid and electricity from Eucheuma denticulatum residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Singh, Gurjeet & Tyagi, V.V. & Singh, P.J. & Pandey, A.K., 2020. "Estimation of thermodynamic characteristics for comprehensive dairy food processing plant: An energetic and exergetic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    5. Lundgren, Tommy & Marklund, Per-Olov & Zhang, Shanshan, 2016. "Industrial energy demand and energy efficiency – Evidence from Sweden," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-152.
    6. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Mo, Qianci & Zhu, Xishan & Deng, Chenquan & Cen, Shuhai & Ye, Haibo & Wang, Chunqiang & Lu, Wei & Chen, Xiaojun & Lin, Xingsu, 2023. "Analysis on influencing factors and improvement of thermal efficiency of bagasse boilers based on performance test data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    8. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    9. Fernández González, P. & Landajo, M. & Presno, M.J., 2014. "Tracking European Union CO2 emissions through LMDI (logarithmic-mean Divisia index) decomposition. The activity revaluation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 741-750.
    10. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    11. Wei, Chu & Löschel, Andreas & Liu, Bing, 2015. "Energy-saving and emission-abatement potential of Chinese coal-fired power enterprise: A non-parametric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 33-43.
    12. Fallahi, Alireza & Farzad, Somayeh & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Mandegari, Mohsen & Görgens, Johann F. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Lam, Su Shiung & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza, 2021. "Sustainability assessment of sugarcane residues valorization to biobutadiene by exergy and exergoeconomic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    13. Li, Jiaxi & Wang, Dan & Jia, Hongjie & Lei, Yang & Zhou, Tianshuo & Guo, Ying, 2022. "Mechanism analysis and unified calculation model of exergy flow distribution in regional integrated energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    14. Magdalena Zdeb & Marta Bis & Artur Przywara, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Influence of Lignocellulosic Biomass Pretreatment Techniques on Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Martínez González, Aldemar & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2019. "Syngas production from oil sludge gasification and its potential use in power generation systems: An energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1175-1190.
    16. Abeykoon, Chamil & Kelly, Adrian L. & Brown, Elaine C. & Coates, Phil D., 2016. "The effect of materials, process settings and screw geometry on energy consumption and melt temperature in single screw extrusion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 880-894.
    17. Cahill, Caiman J. & Ó Gallachóir, Brian P., 2012. "Combining physical and economic output data to analyse energy and CO2 emissions trends in industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 422-429.
    18. Hidalgo, D. & Martín-Marroquín, J.M. & Corona, F., 2019. "A multi-waste management concept as a basis towards a circular economy model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 481-489.
    19. Ang, B.W., 2006. "Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: From energy-GDP ratio to composite efficiency index," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 574-582, March.
    20. Estrada, Omar & Ortiz, Juan Carlos & Hernández, Alexander & López, Iván & Chejne, Farid & del Pilar Noriega, María, 2020. "Experimental study of energy performance of grooved feed and grooved plasticating single screw extrusion processes in terms of SEC, theoretical maximum energy efficiency and relative energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:176:y:2019:i:c:p:211-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.