IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v172y2019icp498-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monte Carlo Simulation approach for economic risk analysis of an emergency energy generation system

Author

Listed:
  • Zaroni, Hebert
  • Maciel, Letícia B.
  • Carvalho, Diego B.
  • Pamplona, Edson de O.

Abstract

Electric generators are largely employed as emergency power sources by preventing some facilities from sudden interruptions of electric energy supply. They may also be used to reduce the energy demand from the power grid by providing electricity over the peak periods. This paper aims to evaluate the owners' economic risk of purchasing an electric generator in order to provide energy during the peak time. The study considers different rated powers of diesel and natural gas-based generators as well as cases with and without an extra expense due to the carbon credit (CCr), which is a cost generated by the emission of greenhouse gases (GHG). Net Present Value (NPV) is used as a method for the economic feasibility analysis while Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), a stochastic approach, is performed to evaluate the economic risk. To verify the applied methodology and accomplish the goals of this work, a Brazilian university project is taken as a case study and the campus is assumed to be an investor of an electric generator. The analysis is performed considering that the facilities are fed energetically during short periods of the day. All rules from Brazilian energy market are taken into consideration. Diesel and natural gas-based generators are able to guarantee a low risk of return on investment to investors and such risk is truly dependent on the generator rated power. Diesel generators present a narrow range of rated powers with a high probability of positive NPV whereas natural gas-based engines show a wide range of them with a null risk of an unprofitable purchase. In cases where carbon credits are considered as extra costs, the probability of a failed business is always higher than the cases they are not taken into account, although the carbon credits have no high sensitivity in the risk analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaroni, Hebert & Maciel, Letícia B. & Carvalho, Diego B. & Pamplona, Edson de O., 2019. "Monte Carlo Simulation approach for economic risk analysis of an emergency energy generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 498-508.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:498-508
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219301616
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pimm, Andrew J. & Cockerill, Tim T. & Taylor, Peter G. & Bastiaans, Jan, 2017. "The value of electricity storage to large enterprises: A case study on Lancaster University," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 378-393.
    2. Johnson, Blake E., 1994. "Modeling energy technology choices : Which investment analysis tools are appropriate?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(10), pages 877-883, October.
    3. Arnold, Uwe & Yildiz, Özgür, 2015. "Economic risk analysis of decentralized renewable energy infrastructures – A Monte Carlo Simulation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 227-239.
    4. Ramli, Makbul A.M. & Hiendro, Ayong & Twaha, Ssennoga, 2015. "Economic analysis of PV/diesel hybrid system with flywheel energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 398-405.
    5. Oliveira, Isabela Alves de & Schaeffer, Roberto & Szklo, Alexandre, 2017. "The impact of energy storage in power systems: The case of Brazil’s Northeastern grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 50-61.
    6. Touretzky, Cara R. & McGuffin, Dana L. & Ziesmer, Jena C. & Baldea, Michael, 2016. "The effect of distributed electricity generation using natural gas on the electric and natural gas grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 500-514.
    7. Dufo-López, Rodolfo & Bernal-Agustín, José L. & Yusta-Loyo, José M. & Domínguez-Navarro, José A. & Ramírez-Rosado, Ignacio J. & Lujano, Juan & Aso, Ismael, 2011. "Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of stand-alone PV–wind–diesel systems with batteries storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4033-4041.
    8. Rout, Auroshis & Sahoo, Sudhansu S. & Thomas, Sanju, 2018. "Risk modeling of domestic solar water heater using Monte Carlo simulation for east-coastal region of India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 548-556.
    9. Teng, Fei & Tondeur, Daniel, 2007. "Efficiency of Carbon storage with leakage: Physical and economical approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 540-548.
    10. Vlysidis, Anestis & Binns, Michael & Webb, Colin & Theodoropoulos, Constantinos, 2011. "A techno-economic analysis of biodiesel biorefineries: Assessment of integrated designs for the co-production of fuels and chemicals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4671-4683.
    11. Aquila, Giancarlo & Rotela Junior, Paulo & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo, 2017. "Wind power feasibility analysis under uncertainty in the Brazilian electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 127-136.
    12. Fleck, Brian & Huot, Marc, 2009. "Comparative life-cycle assessment of a small wind turbine for residential off-grid use," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2688-2696.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aquila, Giancarlo & Coelho, Eden de Oliveira Pinto & Bonatto, Benedito Donizeti & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Nakamura, Wilson Toshiro, 2021. "Perspective of uncertainty and risk from the CVaR-LCOE approach: An analysis of the case of PV microgeneration in Minas Gerais, Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Jiandong Chen & Chong Xu & Yinyin Wu & Zihao Li & Malin Song, 2022. "Drivers and trajectories of China’s renewable energy consumption," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(1), pages 441-459, June.
    3. Catalin Popescu & Sorin Alexandru Gheorghiu, 2021. "Economic Analysis and Generic Algorithm for Optimizing the Investments Decision-Making Process in Oil Field Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Qüinny Soares Rocha & Rafaele Almeida Munis & Richardson Barbosa Gomes da Silva & Elí Wilfredo Zavaleta Aguilar & Danilo Simões, 2023. "Photovoltaic Solar Energy in Forest Nurseries: A Strategic Decision Based on Real Options Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Abba, Z.Y.I. & Balta-Ozkan, N. & Hart, P., 2022. "A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Douglas, Sean & Murphy, Fionnuala, 2023. "Techno-economic potentials of integrating decentralised biomethane production systems into existing natural gas grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    7. Michał Gołębiewski & Marta Galant-Gołębiewska, 2021. "Economic Model and Risk Analysis of Energy Investments Based on Cogeneration Systems and Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Jia-Jeng Sun & Tsu-Ming Yeh & Fan-Yun Pai, 2022. "Application of Monte Carlo Simulation to Study the Probability of Confidence Level under the PFMEA’s Action Priority," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Pablo Benalcazar & Przemysław Kaszyński & Jacek Kamiński, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of Uncertain Energy and Carbon Prices on the Operational Patterns and Economic Results of CHP Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Matos, Catarina R. & Pereira da Silva, Patrícia & Carneiro, Júlio F., 2023. "Economic assessment for compressed air energy storage business model alternatives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    11. Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Javier Garrido & Fernando Rueda-Martinez & Gerardo Alcalá & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2019. "Wind Power Cogeneration to Reduce Peak Electricity Demand in Mexican States Along the Gulf of Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Qi Jun & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2021. "Stochastic hybrid decision‐making based on interval type 2 fuzzy sets for measuring the innovation capacities of financial institutions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 573-593, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Oliveira, Lucas Guedes & Aquila, Giancarlo & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo & de Paiva, Anderson Paulo & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson & Camatta, Ulisses Pessin, 2020. "Evaluating economic feasibility and maximization of social welfare of photovoltaic projects developed for the Brazilian northeastern coast: An attribute agreement analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Carvalho, Diego B. & Pinto, Bárbara L. & Guardia, Eduardo C. & Marangon Lima, José W., 2020. "Economic impact of anticipations or delays in the completion of power generation projects in the Brazilian energy market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1312-1320.
    3. Rocha, Luiz Célio Souza & Aquila, Giancarlo & Rotela Junior, Paulo & Paiva, Anderson Paulo de & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo, 2018. "A stochastic economic viability analysis of residential wind power generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 412-419.
    4. Nguyen, Hai Tra & Safder, Usman & Nhu Nguyen, X.Q. & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2020. "Multi-objective decision-making and optimal sizing of a hybrid renewable energy system to meet the dynamic energy demands of a wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Díaz, Guzmán & Planas, Estefanía & Andreu, Jon & Kortabarria, Iñigo, 2015. "Joint cost of energy under an optimal economic policy of hybrid power systems subject to uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 837-848.
    6. Paulo Rotela Junior & Eugenio Fischetti & Victor G. Araújo & Rogério S. Peruchi & Giancarlo Aquila & Luiz Célio S. Rocha & Liviam S. Lacerda, 2019. "Wind Power Economic Feasibility under Uncertainty and the Application of ANN in Sensitivity Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-10, June.
    7. Alexander Lavrik & Yuri Zhukovskiy & Pavel Tcvetkov, 2021. "Optimizing the Size of Autonomous Hybrid Microgrids with Regard to Load Shifting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Veldhuis, A.J. & Reinders, A.H.M.E., 2015. "Reviewing the potential and cost-effectiveness of off-grid PV systems in Indonesia on a provincial level," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 757-769.
    9. Aquila, Giancarlo & Nakamura, Wilson Toshiro & Junior, Paulo Rotella & Souza Rocha, Luiz Celio & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson, 2021. "Perspectives under uncertainties and risk in wind farms investments based on Omega-LCOE approach: An analysis in São Paulo state, Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Das, Sayan & Dutta, Risav & De, Souvanik & De, Sudipta, 2024. "Review of multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable decentralized hybrid energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Stetter, Chris & Piel, Jan-Hendrik & Hamann, Julian F.H. & Breitner, Michael H., 2020. "Competitive and risk-adequate auction bids for onshore wind projects in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Aman, M.M. & Jasmon, G.B. & Ghufran, A. & Bakar, A.H.A. & Mokhlis, H., 2013. "Investigating possible wind energy potential to meet the power shortage in Karachi," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 528-542.
    13. Nugent, Daniel & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2014. "Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar PV and wind energy: A critical meta-survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 229-244.
    14. Lujano-Rojas, Juan M. & Dufo-López, Rodolfo & Bernal-Agustín, José L., 2012. "Optimal sizing of small wind/battery systems considering the DC bus voltage stability effect on energy capture, wind speed variability, and load uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 404-412.
    15. Rodríguez-Gallegos, Carlos D. & Yang, Dazhi & Gandhi, Oktoviano & Bieri, Monika & Reindl, Thomas & Panda, S.K., 2018. "A multi-objective and robust optimization approach for sizing and placement of PV and batteries in off-grid systems fully operated by diesel generators: An Indonesian case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 410-429.
    16. Gabriel Nasser Doyle de Doile & Paulo Rotella Junior & Priscila França Gonzaga Carneiro & Rogério Santana Peruchi & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha & Karel Janda & Giancarlo Aquila, 2021. "Economic Feasibility of Photovoltaic Micro-Installations Connected to the Brazilian Distribution Grid in Light of Proposed Changes to Regulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Jiaxin Lu & Weijun Wang & Yingchao Zhang & Song Cheng, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Stand-Alone Hybrid Energy System Using Entropy Weight Method Based on HOMER," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Galina Chebotareva & Inna Čábelková & Wadim Strielkowski & Luboš Smutka & Anna Zielińska-Chmielewska & Stanislaw Bielski, 2023. "The Role of State in Managing the Wind Energy Projects: Risk Assessment and Justification of the Economic Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Arnold, Uwe & Yildiz, Özgür, 2015. "Economic risk analysis of decentralized renewable energy infrastructures – A Monte Carlo Simulation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 227-239.
    20. Rashedi, A. & Sridhar, I. & Tseng, K.J., 2013. "Life cycle assessment of 50MW wind firms and strategies for impact reduction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 89-101.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:498-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.