IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v153y2018icp200-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of a sustainable energy chain designed for promoting the hydrogen mobility by means of fuel-cell powered bicycles

Author

Listed:
  • Minutillo, M.
  • Forcina, A.
  • Jannelli, N.
  • Lubrano Lavadera, A.

Abstract

This paper aims to develop a sustainable energy chain that by means of a solar-driven electrolysis system produces renewable hydrogen used as fuel in fuel-cell-powered bicycles. The novel hydrogen bicycle model is the core of the bike-sharing program that is proposed in a Southern Italy tourist place. The sustainable energy chain development has required: i) the definition of the bike-sharing program based on some assumptions such as number of bicycles, number of routes, maximum number of trips per bike per day, mean driver weight, average cycling speed, etc.; ii) the analysis of the hydrogen bike performance; iii) the design of each involved energy sub-section such as the photovoltaic power plant, the hydrogen production system, the hydrogen storage unit and the hydrogen transportation and distribution section. The study has been conducted by implementing a design-sizing methodology. Results have highlighted that, according to the bike sharing program assumptions, the proposed sustainable energy chain consists of a 103 kWp PV power plant that, generating 129 MWh of electric energy, allows to produce 2190 kg of hydrogen by using an alkaline electrolyzer (16 kW). The bike sharing program, with 3772 km travelled in the selected area, contributes to reduce the greenhouse gas emission.

Suggested Citation

  • Minutillo, M. & Forcina, A. & Jannelli, N. & Lubrano Lavadera, A., 2018. "Assessment of a sustainable energy chain designed for promoting the hydrogen mobility by means of fuel-cell powered bicycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 200-210.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:153:y:2018:i:c:p:200-210
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218306042
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tien Dung Tran & Nicolas Ovtracht & Bruno Faivre d'Arcier, 2015. "Modeling Bike Sharing System using Built Environment Factors," Post-Print halshs-01474166, HAL.
    2. Shaheen, Susan & Guzman, Stacey & Zhang, Hua, 2010. "Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, Present, and Future," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt79v822k5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Li, Mengyu & Zhang, Xiongwen & Li, Guojun, 2016. "A comparative assessment of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles using a well-to-wheel analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 693-704.
    4. Elliot Fishman, 2016. "Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 92-113, January.
    5. Bartolozzi, I. & Rizzi, F. & Frey, M., 2013. "Comparison between hydrogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: A case study in Tuscany, Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 103-111.
    6. Shaheen, Susan A & Guzman, Stacey & Zhang, Hua, 2010. "Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, Present and Future," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6qg8q6ft, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Park, Sang Yong & Kim, Jong Wook & Lee, Duk Hee, 2011. "Development of a market penetration forecasting model for Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles considering infrastructure and cost reduction effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3307-3315, June.
    8. Ajanovic, Amela & Haas, Reinhard, 2016. "Dissemination of electric vehicles in urban areas: Major factors for success," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P2), pages 1451-1458.
    9. Lieven, Theo, 2015. "Policy measures to promote electric mobility – A global perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 78-93.
    10. Menanteau, P. & Quéméré, M.M. & Le Duigou, A. & Le Bastard, S., 2011. "An economic analysis of the production of hydrogen from wind-generated electricity for use in transport applications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2957-2965, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Yiqing & Pian, Yawei & Liu, Qiang, 2019. "Design of energy harvester using rotating motion rectifier and its application on bicycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 222-231.
    2. Andrea Luigi Facci & Marco Lauricella & Sauro Succi & Vittorio Villani & Giacomo Falcucci, 2021. "Optimized Modeling and Design of a PCM-Enhanced H 2 Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Hieu, Le Trong & Lim, Ock Taeck, 2024. "Deep learning application in fuel cell electric bicycle to optimize bicycle performance and energy consumption under the effect of key input parameters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    4. Di Trolio, P. & Di Giorgio, P. & Genovese, M. & Frasci, E. & Minutillo, M., 2020. "A hybrid power-unit based on a passive fuel cell/battery system for lightweight vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    5. Stropnik, R. & Sekavčnik, M. & Ferriz, A.M. & Mori, M., 2018. "Reducing environmental impacts of the ups system based on PEM fuel cell with circular economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 824-835.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Todd, James & O'Brien, Oliver & Cheshire, James, 2021. "A global comparison of bicycle sharing systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Wang, Kailai & Akar, Gulsah, 2019. "Gender gap generators for bike share ridership: Evidence from Citi Bike system in New York City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Gu, Tianqi & Kim, Inhi & Currie, Graham, 2019. "To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 122-147.
    4. Alexandros Nikitas, 2019. "How to Save Bike-Sharing: An Evidence-Based Survival Toolkit for Policy-Makers and Mobility Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Lijuan Wang & Songbai Liu, 2020. "Study on the Influencing Factors and Consumer Behaviors of Bicycle Sharing in Beijing," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-40, March.
    6. Jing Lan & Yuge Ma & Dajian Zhu & Diana Mangalagiu & Thomas F. Thornton, 2017. "Enabling Value Co-Creation in the Sharing Economy: The Case of Mobike," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Nixon, Denver V. & Schwanen, Tim, 2019. "Bike sharing beyond the norm," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Cai Jia & Yanyan Chen & Tingzhao Chen & Yanan Li & Luzhou Lin, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis on Sharing Bicycles and Metro Strategies: Impact of Phasing out Subsidies for Bicycle–Metro Integration Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Chambers, Peter, 2020. "O Bike in Melbourne: A plea for more scepticism about disruption and capital, based on what we can know about one dockless bike scheme," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 72-80.
    10. Van Veghel, Daniel & Scott, Darren M., 2024. "Investigating the impacts of bike lanes on bike share ridership: A holistic approach and demonstration," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Ma, Xinwei & Ji, Yanjie & Yuan, Yufei & Van Oort, Niels & Jin, Yuchuan & Hoogendoorn, Serge, 2020. "A comparison in travel patterns and determinants of user demand between docked and dockless bike-sharing systems using multi-sourced data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 148-173.
    12. Mooney, Stephen J. & Hosford, Kate & Howe, Bill & Yan, An & Winters, Meghan & Bassok, Alon & Hirsch, Jana A., 2019. "Freedom from the station: Spatial equity in access to dockless bike share," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 91-96.
    13. Elżbieta Macioszek & Paulina Świerk & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Bike-Sharing System as an Element of Enhancing Sustainable Mobility—A Case Study based on a City in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.
    14. Ma, Xinwei & Zhang, Shuai & Wu, Tao & Yang, Yizhe & Yu, Jiajie, 2023. "Can dockless and docked bike-sharing substitute each other? Evidence from Nanjing, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Narayanan, Santhanakrishnan & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2023. "Shared mobility services towards Mobility as a Service (MaaS): What, who and when?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Li, Shaoying & Zhuang, Caigang & Tan, Zhangzhi & Gao, Feng & Lai, Zhipeng & Wu, Zhifeng, 2021. "Inferring the trip purposes and uncovering spatio-temporal activity patterns from dockless shared bike dataset in Shenzhen, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Liu, Hung-Chi & Lin, Jen-Jia, 2019. "Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of public bicycle use," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 299-312.
    18. Raky Julio & Andres Monzon & Yusak O. Susilo, 2024. "Identifying key elements for user satisfaction of bike-sharing systems: a combination of direct and indirect evaluations," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 407-438, April.
    19. Mix, Richard & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Raveau, Sebastián, 2022. "Optimal location of bike-sharing stations: A built environment and accessibility approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 126-142.
    20. Mateo-Babiano, Iderlina & Bean, Richard & Corcoran, Jonathan & Pojani, Dorina, 2016. "How does our natural and built environment affect the use of bicycle sharing?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 295-307.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:153:y:2018:i:c:p:200-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.