IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v147y2018icp1030-1043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transient analysis and validation with experimental data of supercritical CO2 integral experiment loop by using MARS

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Joo Hyun
  • Bae, Sung Won
  • Park, Hyun Sun
  • Cha, Jae Eun
  • Kim, Moo Hwan

Abstract

To develop a cycle operation strategy for a supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) Brayton cycle, a series of MARS code simulation results were compared to experimental data from an SCIEL compressor test, which was collected at both component and whole-loop level. The simulation results show reasonable agreement with the experimental results. The MARS code was used to simulate behavioral responses at varying scenarios, the valve control for cycle operation, a power swing to simulate load following behavior, and an effect of the heat sink reduction to simulate failure. The electric power output of the turbine decreased to 50% of that during normal operation through valve control. After power swing, the system reverted to the initial steady-state conditions. The fluid behavior in precooler and the eventual change in the system were identified through the scenario of the heat sink reduction. The simulations provide a notable insight into the responsiveness of an SCIEL to these variable scenarios. Even though the MARS code was specifically developed for analysis of water reactor transients, its field of application may be extended to analyze the S-CO2 Brayton cycle, and may thus assist with the development of control strategies for SCIEL and the S-CO2 Brayton cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Joo Hyun & Bae, Sung Won & Park, Hyun Sun & Cha, Jae Eun & Kim, Moo Hwan, 2018. "Transient analysis and validation with experimental data of supercritical CO2 integral experiment loop by using MARS," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1030-1043.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:147:y:2018:i:c:p:1030-1043
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217321357
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahn, Yoonhan & Lee, Jekyoung & Kim, Seong Gu & Lee, Jeong Ik & Cha, Jae Eun & Lee, Si-Woo, 2015. "Design consideration of supercritical CO2 power cycle integral experiment loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 115-127.
    2. Singh, Rajinesh & Kearney, Michael P. & Manzie, Chris, 2013. "Extremum-seeking control of a supercritical carbon-dioxide closed Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 380-387.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Quanbin & Xu, Jiayuan & Hou, Min & Chong, Daotong & Wang, Jinshi & Chen, Weixiong, 2024. "Dynamic characteristic analysis of SCO2 Brayton cycle under different turbine back pressure modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Michalski, Sebastian & Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Advanced power cycles for coal-fired power plants based on calcium looping combustion: A techno-economic feasibility assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    4. Bian, Xingyan & Wang, Xuan & Wang, Rui & Cai, Jinwen & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn & Lin, Zhimin & Yu, Xiangyu & Shi, Lingfeng, 2022. "A comprehensive evaluation of the effect of different control valves on the dynamic performance of a recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Deng, Tianrui & Li, Xionghui & Wang, Qiuwang & Ma, Ting, 2019. "Dynamic modelling and transient characteristics of supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 292-302.
    6. Li, Yuzhe & Feng, Jiaqi & Zhang, Xu & Bai, Bofeng, 2023. "Technical benefits of the subcritical inlet condition for high-speed CO2 centrifugal compressor in the advanced power-generation cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    7. Zhang, Lianjie & Deng, Tianrui & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Zeng, Min & Ma, Ting & Wang, Qiuwang, 2021. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle at different heat source temperatures and its analysis under leakage and disturbance conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    8. Du, Yadong & Yang, Ce & Zhao, Ben & Gao, Jianbing & Hu, Chenxing & Zhang, Hanzhi & Zhao, Wei, 2022. "Dynamic characteristics of a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle against variable operating conditions and temperature fluctuations of reactor outlet coolant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Analysis for flexible operation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with solar thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 752-771.
    3. Linares, José Ignacio & Cantizano, Alexis & Arenas, Eva & Moratilla, Beatriz Yolanda & Martín-Palacios, Víctor & Batet, Lluis, 2017. "Recuperated versus single-recuperator re-compressed supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles for DEMO fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 307-317.
    4. Atif, Maimoon. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Energy and exergy analyses of solar tower power plant driven supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycles for six different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 153-167.
    5. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Guo, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Design analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide recuperator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 21-27.
    7. Mauger, Gedeon & Tauveron, Nicolas & Bentivoglio, Fabrice & Ruby, Alain, 2019. "On the dynamic modeling of Brayton cycle power conversion systems with the CATHARE-3 code," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1002-1016.
    8. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    9. Maria Alessandra Ancona & Michele Bianchi & Lisa Branchini & Andrea De Pascale & Francesco Melino & Antonio Peretto & Noemi Torricelli, 2021. "Systematic Comparison of ORC and s-CO 2 Combined Heat and Power Plants for Energy Harvesting in Industrial Gas Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Wang, Shengpeng & Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Yao, Mingyu & Peng, Botao & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Thermohydrodynamic analysis of the vertical gas wall and reheat gas wall in a 300 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Battisti, Felipe G. & Cardemil, José M. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2016. "A multivariable optimization of a Brayton power cycle operating with CO2 as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 908-916.
    12. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.
    13. Dang, Chaolei & Xu, Jing & Chen, Zhichao & Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Liu, Guodong, 2024. "Comparative study of different layouts in the closed-Brayton-cycle-based segmented cooling thermal management system for scramjets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    14. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    15. Yang, D.L. & Tang, G.H. & Fan, Y.H. & Li, X.L. & Wang, S.Q., 2020. "Arrangement and three-dimensional analysis of cooling wall in 1000 MW S–CO2 coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    16. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Ata D. Akbari & Marc A. Rosen, 2016. "Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a New Combined Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton/Kalina Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Knez, Ž. & Markočič, E. & Leitgeb, M. & Primožič, M. & Knez Hrnčič, M. & Škerget, M., 2014. "Industrial applications of supercritical fluids: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 235-243.
    18. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    19. Jeong, Yongju & Cho, Seong Kuk & Son, In Woo & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2023. "Evaluation of off-design scaling methods of supercritical CO2 compressor with experimental data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    20. Tingting Xu & Hongxia Zhao & Miao Wang & Jianhui Qi, 2021. "Numerical Study of Thermal-Hydraulic Performance of a New Spiral Z-Type PCHE for Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:147:y:2018:i:c:p:1030-1043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.