IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v86y2015icp792-801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing distorted trading incentives of balance responsible parties based on the example of the Swiss power system

Author

Listed:
  • Scherer, Marc
  • Haubensak, Oliver
  • Staake, Thorsten

Abstract

Power systems require a continuous balance of supply and demand. In Europe, this task is shared between Balance Responsible Parties (BRPs) and Transmission System Operators (TSOs). For this purpose, the European electricity sector consists of several markets. Objective of this paper is to investigate distorted incentives that stem from loopholes in the market design which BRPs can use to undermine electricity balancing principles in favour of gaming opportunities between the domestic imbalance energy pricing and international wholesale markets. These incentives are evaluated using historical data from the Swiss power system which features a typical European imbalance pricing mechanism. The results imply that little effort would have been needed to make a good profit at the expense of system security. The major loophole arises from the interdependence between cross-border trading and national imbalance energy pricing. Bearing in mind the European Union's Third Energy Package, the importance of national balancing mechanisms will increase strongly. In this context, national remedies to cope with distorted incentives are outlined and the importance of harmonising balancing markets on an international level is elaborated.

Suggested Citation

  • Scherer, Marc & Haubensak, Oliver & Staake, Thorsten, 2015. "Assessing distorted trading incentives of balance responsible parties based on the example of the Swiss power system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 792-801.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:86:y:2015:i:c:p:792-801
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421515300707
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farahmand, H. & Doorman, G.L., 2012. "Balancing market integration in the Northern European continent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 316-326.
    2. Boogert, Alexander & Dupont, Dominique, 2005. "On the effectiveness of the anti-gaming policy between the day-ahead and real-time electricity markets in The Netherlands," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 752-770, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oprea, Simona-Vasilica & Bâra, Adela & Ciurea, Cristian-Eugen, 2022. "A novel cost-revenue allocation computation for the competitiveness of balancing responsible parties, including RES. Insights from the electricity market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 881-894.
    2. Meysam Khojasteh & Pedro Faria & Fernando Lezama & Zita Vale, 2023. "A Robust Model for Portfolio Management of Microgrid Operator in the Balancing Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pietz, Matthäus, 2009. "Risk premia in electricity wholesale spot markets: empirical evidence from Germany," CEFS Working Paper Series 2009-11, Technische Universität München (TUM), Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS).
    2. Vijayanarasimha Hindupur Pakka & Richard Mark Rylatt, 2016. "Design and Analysis of Electrical Distribution Networks and Balancing Markets in the UK: A New Framework with Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Casimir Lorenz & Clemens Gerbaulet, 2017. "Wind Providing Balancing Reserves: An Application to the German Electricity System of 2025," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1655, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Santhosh, Apoorva & Farid, Amro M. & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2014. "Real-time economic dispatch for the supply side of the energy-water nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 42-52.
    5. Möller, Christoph & Rachev, Svetlozar T. & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2011. "Balancing energy strategies in electricity portfolio management," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 2-11, January.
    6. Fridrik M. Baldursson & Ewa Lazarczyk & Marten Ovaere & Stef Proost, 2018. "Cross-Border Exchange and Sharing of Generation Reserve Capacity," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(4), pages 57-84, July.
    7. Yuewen Jiang & Meisen Chen & Shi You, 2017. "A Unified Trading Model Based on Robust Optimization for Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets with Wind Power Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Brijs, Tom & De Jonghe, Cedric & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Belmans, Ronnie, 2017. "Interactions between the design of short-term electricity markets in the CWE region and power system flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 36-51.
    9. Fridgen, Gilbert & Keller, Robert & Thimmel, Markus & Wederhake, Lars, 2017. "Shifting load through space–The economics of spatial demand side management using distributed data centers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 400-413.
    10. Wang, Tonghe & Guo, Jian & Ai, Songpu & Cao, Junwei, 2021. "RBT: A distributed reputation system for blockchain-based peer-to-peer energy trading with fairness consideration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    11. Savelli, Iacopo & Cornélusse, Bertrand & Giannitrapani, Antonio & Paoletti, Simone & Vicino, Antonio, 2018. "A new approach to electricity market clearing with uniform purchase price and curtailable block orders," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 618-630.
    12. Leen Vandezande & Leonardo Meeus & Ronnie Belmans & Marcelo Saguan & Jean-Michel Glachant & Vincent Rious, 2009. "Lacking balancing market harmonisation in Europe: room for trader profits at the expense of economic efficiency?," Post-Print hal-00422185, HAL.
    13. Widl, Edmund & Jacobs, Tobias & Schwabeneder, Daniel & Nicolas, Sebastien & Basciotti, Daniele & Henein, Sawsan & Noh, Tae-Gil & Terreros, Olatz & Schuelke, Anett & Auer, Hans, 2018. "Studying the potential of multi-carrier energy distribution grids: A holistic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 519-529.
    14. Christoph Loschan & Daniel Schwabeneder & Matthias Maldet & Georg Lettner & Hans Auer, 2023. "Hydrogen as Short-Term Flexibility and Seasonal Storage in a Sector-Coupled Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-35, July.
    15. Zhou, Bo & Ai, Xiaomeng & Fang, Jiakun & Yao, Wei & Zuo, Wenping & Chen, Zhe & Wen, Jinyu, 2019. "Data-adaptive robust unit commitment in the hybrid AC/DC power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    16. Stawska, Anna & Romero, Natalia & de Weerdt, Mathijs & Verzijlbergh, Remco, 2021. "Demand response: For congestion management or for grid balancing?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    17. Casimir Lorenz, 2017. "Balancing Reserves within a Decarbonized European Electricity System in 2050: From Market Developments to Model Insights," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1656, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    18. Backer, Martijn & Keles, Dogan & Kraft, Emil, 2023. "The economic impacts of integrating European balancing markets: The case of the newly installed aFRR energy market-coupling platform PICASSO," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    19. Iacopo Savelli & Bertrand Corn'elusse & Antonio Giannitrapani & Simone Paoletti & Antonio Vicino, 2017. "A New Approach to Electricity Market Clearing With Uniform Purchase Price and Curtailable Block Orders," Papers 1711.07731, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2018.
    20. Hirth, Lion, 2016. "The benefits of flexibility: The value of wind energy with hydropower," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 210-223.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:86:y:2015:i:c:p:792-801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.