IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v72y2014icp129-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designers׳ enactment of the policy intentions. An ethnographic study of the adoption of energy regulations in England and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Zapata-Lancaster, Gabriela
  • Tweed, Chris

Abstract

The United Kingdom is aspiring to reduce the carbon emissions in the building sector, aiming to achieve nearly zero carbon buildings by 2020. The policy models in England and Wales rely on three strands: regulations; financial incentives and educational schemes. A growing body of literature suggests that the building industry is facing several barriers that hinder the delivery of the expected carbon targets outlined at policy level. This research explores the enactment of the policy aspirations by building designers using a bottom-up approach. An ethnographic study was conducted to analyse the design process of six non-domestic buildings. The work identified the designers׳ responses to adopt the policy agenda in routine design and overcome the challenges that emerged during the design process. The understanding of the designers׳ responses could inform the policy model and suggest areas that need attention for the timely delivery of the expected carbon reductions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zapata-Lancaster, Gabriela & Tweed, Chris, 2014. "Designers׳ enactment of the policy intentions. An ethnographic study of the adoption of energy regulations in England and Wales," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 129-139.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:72:y:2014:i:c:p:129-139
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514002687
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pan, Wei & Garmston, Helen, 2012. "Building regulations in energy efficiency: Compliance in England and Wales," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 594-605.
    2. Katie Williams & Carol Dair, 2007. "What is stopping sustainable building in England? Barriers experienced by stakeholders in delivering sustainable developments," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 135-147.
    3. Kjell Tryggestad & Susse Georg & Tor Hernes, 2010. "Constructing buildings and design ambitions," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 695-705.
    4. Jan Fischer & Simon Guy, 2009. "Re-interpreting Regulations: Architects as Intermediaries for Low-carbon Buildings," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 2577-2594, November.
    5. Samuel Laryea, 2011. "Quality of tender documents: case studies from the UK," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 275-286.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guibentif, Thomas M.M. & Patel, Martin K. & Yilmaz, Selin, 2021. "Using energy saving deficit distributions to assess calculated, deemed and metered electricity savings estimations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    2. Catherine Willan & Kathryn B. Janda & David Kenington, 2021. "Seeking the Pressure Points: Catalysing Low Carbon Changes from the Middle-Out in Offices and Schools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berardi, Umberto, 2013. "Stakeholders’ influence on the adoption of energy-saving technologies in Italian homes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 520-530.
    2. Kjell Tryggestad, 2012. "Perspectives on Projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 416-420, February.
    3. João Adelino Ribeiro & Paulo Jorge Pereira & Elísio Brandão, 2013. "Volume Uncertainty in Construction Projects: a Real Options Approach," CEF.UP Working Papers 1309, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    4. Wei Wang & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su & Xinyang Deng, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Adoption and Diffusion of GBTS in the Construction Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Kivimaa, Paula & Boon, Wouter & Hyysalo, Sampsa & Klerkx, Laurens, 2019. "Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1062-1075.
    6. Andrey Berezin & Natalia Gorodnova & Bruno S. Sergi & Chanel Tri Handoko & Chrisna T. Permana, 2023. "Prospects for Energy Transition to Hydrogen Fuel: Analysis of World Experience and Russian Practice," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 641-653, July.
    7. Paula Kivimaa & Wouter Boon & Sampsa Hyysalo & Laurens Klerkx, 2017. "Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Transitions: a Systematic Review," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-17, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    8. Vidushini Siva & Thomas Hoppe & Mansi Jain, 2017. "Green Buildings in Singapore; Analyzing a Frontrunner’s Sectoral Innovation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, May.
    9. David J. Jackson & Katharina Kaesehage, 2020. "Addressing the challenges of integrating carbon calculation tools in the construction industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 2973-2983, December.
    10. Feyisetan Leo-Olagbaye & Henry Odeyinka & Pavithra Rathnasiri, 2023. "Stakeholders’ Roles in the Delivery of Sustainable Housing Projects in Lagos State, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Isaac Doku & Sonal Agarwal, 2016. "The Perception of Investors on Real Estate Sustainability in Ghana," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(4), pages 261-273, April.
    12. Alohan Ernest O. & Oyetunji Abiodun Kolawole, 2021. "Hindrance and Benefits to Green Building Implementation: Evidence from Benin City, Nigeria," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 65-76, September.
    13. Jisoo Shim & Doosam Song & Joowook Kim, 2018. "The Economic Feasibility of Passive Houses in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Xiaojing Sun & Marilyn A. Brown & Matt Cox & Roderick Jackson, 2016. "Mandating better buildings: a global review of building codes and prospects for improvement in the United States," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 188-215, March.
    15. Didi van Doren & Peter PJ Driessen & Hens Runhaar & Mendel Giezen, 2018. "Scaling-up low-carbon urban initiatives: Towards a better understanding," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 175-194, January.
    16. Shen, Liyin & Zhang, Zhenyu & Long, Zhijian, 2017. "Significant barriers to green procurement in real estate development," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 160-168.
    17. Sage, Daniel & Dainty, Andrew & Brookes, Naomi, 2013. "Thinking the ontological politics of managerial and critical performativities: An examination of project failure," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 282-291.
    18. Luka Oreskovic & Rajat Gupta, 2022. "Enabling Sustainable Lifestyles in New Urban Areas: Evaluation of an Eco-Development Case Study in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Cynthia Souaid & Harry van der Heijden & Marja Elsinga, 2021. "Institutional Barriers to Near Zero-Energy Housing: A Context Specific Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Simona Fiandrino & Francesco Scarpa & Riccardo Torelli, 2022. "Fostering Social Impact Through Corporate Implementation of the SDGs: Transformative Mechanisms Towards Interconnectedness and Inclusiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 959-973, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:72:y:2014:i:c:p:129-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.