IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v190y2024ics030142152400185x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of seabed lease fees on offshore wind farm design

Author

Listed:
  • Laido, Ahti Simo
  • Hansen, Tyler A.
  • Kitzing, Lena

Abstract

Governments that control seabed generally extract fees from the offshore wind sector, often tying these fees to the characteristics of the proposed wind farms. These fees could change the optimal design of offshore wind farms, thereby affecting the long-term development of the industry. We employ microeconomic theory and incentive-response analysis to explain the effects of different types of fees on the optimal design and characteristics of offshore wind farms. We find that fees that are structured to be proportional to wind farm area, nameplate capacity, production, and revenue may influence the optimal design of a wind farm from a wind farm developer's perspective. Fees based on area, production, or revenue may result in less area used by developers. Fees based on capacity, production, or revenue may result in the choice of turbines with lower specific power, while fees based on production or revenue may additionally encourage the use of smaller turbines. All four fee types may encourage developers to use fewer turbines per wind farm. If designed intentionally, policymakers could use seabed lease fees to guide the wind farm designs toward more socioeconomically optimal outcomes, including less area used, reduced environmental impacts, or better grid integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Laido, Ahti Simo & Hansen, Tyler A. & Kitzing, Lena, 2024. "The influence of seabed lease fees on offshore wind farm design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:190:y:2024:i:c:s030142152400185x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152400185X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. May, Nils, 2017. "The impact of wind power support schemes on technology choices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 343-354.
    2. Malte Jansen & Iain Staffell & Lena Kitzing & Sylvain Quoilin & Edwin Wiggelinkhuizen & Bernard Bulder & Iegor Riepin & Felix Müsgens, 2020. "Offshore wind competitiveness in mature markets without subsidy," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 614-622, August.
    3. Möller, Bernd & Hong, Lixuan & Lonsing, Reinhard & Hvelplund, Frede, 2012. "Evaluation of offshore wind resources by scale of development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 314-322.
    4. Ederer, Nikolaus, 2015. "Evaluating capital and operating cost efficiency of offshore wind farms: A DEA approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1034-1046.
    5. Grady, S.A. & Hussaini, M.Y. & Abdullah, M.M., 2005. "Placement of wind turbines using genetic algorithms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 259-270.
    6. Swisher, Philip & Murcia Leon, Juan Pablo & Gea-Bermúdez, Juan & Koivisto, Matti & Madsen, Helge Aagaard & Münster, Marie, 2022. "Competitiveness of a low specific power, low cut-out wind speed wind turbine in North and Central Europe towards 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    7. Dismukes, David E. & Upton, Gregory B., 2015. "Economies of scale, learning effects and offshore wind development costs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 61-66.
    8. Ryan Wiser & Joseph Rand & Joachim Seel & Philipp Beiter & Erin Baker & Eric Lantz & Patrick Gilman, 2021. "Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 555-565, May.
    9. González-Longatt, F. & Wall, P. & Terzija, V., 2012. "Wake effect in wind farm performance: Steady-state and dynamic behavior," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 329-338.
    10. Geoffrey Black, 2002. "A transaction cost model of contract choice: The case of petroleum exploration," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 8(3), pages 235-247, August.
    11. Christoph Wolter & Henrik Klinge Jacobsen & Lorenzo Zeni & Georgios Rogdakis & Nicolaos A. Cutululis, 2020. "Overplanting in offshore wind power plants in different regulatory regimes," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), May.
    12. Huntington, Samuel C. & Rodilla, Pablo & Herrero, Ignacio & Batlle, Carlos, 2017. "Revisiting support policies for RES-E adulthood: Towards market compatible schemes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 474-483.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santhakumar, Srinivasan & Smart, Gavin & Noonan, Miriam & Meerman, Hans & Faaij, André, 2022. "Technological progress observed for fixed-bottom offshore wind in the EU and UK," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Shields, Matt & Beiter, Philipp & Nunemaker, Jake & Cooperman, Aubryn & Duffy, Patrick, 2021. "Impacts of turbine and plant upsizing on the levelized cost of energy for offshore wind," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    3. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2017. "Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1283-1297.
    4. Song, Zhe & Zhang, Zijun & Chen, Xingying, 2016. "The decision model of 3-dimensional wind farm layout design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 248-258.
    5. Pedersen, Jaap & Weinand, Jann Michael & Syranidou, Chloi & Rehfeldt, Daniel, 2024. "An efficient solver for large-scale onshore wind farm siting including cable routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 616-630.
    6. Serrano González, Javier & Burgos Payán, Manuel & Santos, Jesús Manuel Riquelme & González-Longatt, Francisco, 2014. "A review and recent developments in the optimal wind-turbine micro-siting problem," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 133-144.
    7. Philipp Beiter & Aubryn Cooperman & Eric Lantz & Tyler Stehly & Matt Shields & Ryan Wiser & Thomas Telsnig & Lena Kitzing & Volker Berkhout & Yuka Kikuchi, 2021. "Wind power costs driven by innovation and experience with further reductions on the horizon," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), September.
    8. De-Prada-Gil, Mikel & Díaz-González, Francisco & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol & Sumper, Andreas, 2015. "DFIG-based offshore wind power plant connected to a single VSC-HVDC operated at variable frequency: Energy yield assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 311-322.
    9. Vetters, Jade & Thomassen, Gwenny & Van Passel, Steven, 2024. "Sailing through end-of-life challenges: A comprehensive review for offshore wind," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Meus, Jelle & De Vits, Sarah & S'heeren, Nele & Delarue, Erik & Proost, Stef, 2021. "Renewable electricity support in perfect markets: Economic incentives under diverse subsidy instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Pryor, Sara C. & Barthelmie, Rebecca J., 2024. "Wind shadows impact planning of large offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    12. Yin, Peng-Yeng & Cheng, Chun-Ying & Chen, Hsin-Min & Wu, Tsai-Hung, 2020. "Risk-aware optimal planning for a hybrid wind-solar farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 290-302.
    13. Meus, Jelle & Van den Bergh, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik & Proost, Stef, 2019. "On international renewable cooperation mechanisms: The impact of national RES-E support schemes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 859-873.
    14. Schlecht, Ingmar & Maurer, Christoph & Hirth, Lion, 2024. "Financial contracts for differences: The problems with conventional CfDs in electricity markets and how forward contracts can help solve them," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    15. Xiawei Wu & Weihao Hu & Qi Huang & Cong Chen & Zhe Chen & Frede Blaabjerg, 2019. "Optimized Placement of Onshore Wind Farms Considering Topography," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Shakoor, Rabia & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Raheem, Abdur & Wu, Yuan-Kang, 2016. "Wake effect modeling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen׳s model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1048-1059.
    17. Yin, Peng-Yeng & Wu, Tsai-Hung & Hsu, Ping-Yi, 2017. "Risk management of wind farm micro-siting using an enhanced genetic algorithm with simulation optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 508-521.
    18. Benini, Giacomo & Cattani, Gilles, 2022. "Measuring the long run technical efficiency of offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    19. Malleret, Simon & Jansen, Malte & Laido, Ahti Simo & Kitzing, Lena, 2024. "Profitability dynamics of offshore wind from auction to investment decision," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Hughes, Llewelyn & Longden, Thomas, 2024. "Offshore wind power in the Asia-Pacific: Expert elicitation on costs and policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:190:y:2024:i:c:s030142152400185x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.