IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v181y2023ics0301421523002665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities for the German gas grid by using synthetic fuels from an energy system perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Kattelmann, Felix
  • Marmullaku, Drin
  • Blesl, Markus
  • Hufendiek, Kai

Abstract

The German government’s goals of climate neutrality by 2045 are exerting high pressure on the gas grids, as natural gas consumption has to cease. However, gas grids could be operated further by using synthetic energy carriers. As this heavily affects grid maintenance and future investment decisions, it is essential that operators gain clarity about the future of their assets. This paper applies the TIMES PanEU energy system model to examine opportunities for the gas grid arising from synthetic fuels from a system perspective. Therefore, the model is methodically enhanced by depicting infrastructures and conducting an integrative analysis of the gas grid. Up to 50% of the grids can be operated economically in case low-cost synthetic methane is available, low-cost hydrogen can allow around 2/3 of the gas transmission grids to be operated. However, since the building sector uses about 2/3 less gaseous fuels even in optimistic scenarios, the distribution grids are strongly deconstructed in all scenarios. From a system perspective, investments in the expansion of the gas grids therefore seem to be rather sunk costs in the long term, since a more or less strong dismantling appears to be inevitable, with permanently high fossil gas prices even accelerating this trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Kattelmann, Felix & Marmullaku, Drin & Blesl, Markus & Hufendiek, Kai, 2023. "Opportunities for the German gas grid by using synthetic fuels from an energy system perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:181:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523002665
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523002665
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pinar Korkmaz & Roland Cunha Montenegro & Dorothea Schmid & Markus Blesl & Ulrich Fahl, 2020. "On the Way to a Sustainable European Energy System: Setting Up an Integrated Assessment Toolbox with TIMES PanEU as the Key Component," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-36, February.
    2. Felix Kattelmann & Jonathan Siegle & Roland Cunha Montenegro & Vera Sehn & Markus Blesl & Ulrich Fahl, 2021. "How to Reach the New Green Deal Targets: Analysing the Necessary Burden Sharing within the EU Using a Multi-Model Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Schmugge, Jens, 2021. "Interaction of hydrogen infrastructures with other sector coupling options towards a zero-emission energy system in Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 140-156.
    4. Samsatli, Sheila & Samsatli, Nouri J., 2019. "The role of renewable hydrogen and inter-seasonal storage in decarbonising heat – Comprehensive optimisation of future renewable energy value chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 854-893.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Fortuna & Arturo Buscarino, 2022. "Sustainable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Fehler, Alexander & Gaumnitz, Felix & van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Bußa, 2022. "Modeling flexibility in energy systems — comparison of power sector models based on simplified test cases," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Ives, Matthew & Cesaro, Zac & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Bañares-Alcántara, René, 2023. "Facilitating deep decarbonization via sector coupling of green hydrogen and ammonia," INET Oxford Working Papers 2023-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    4. Kotek, Peter & Tóth, Borbála Takácsné & Selei, Adrienn, 2023. "Designing a future-proof gas and hydrogen infrastructure for Europe – A modelling-based approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    6. D'Orazio, Paola & Hertel, Tobias & Kasbrink, Fynn, 2022. "No need to worry? Estimating the exposure of the German banking sector to climate-related transition risks," Ruhr Economic Papers 946, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    7. Al-Mufachi, Naser A. & Shah, Nilay, 2022. "The role of hydrogen and fuel cell technology in providing security for the UK energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Wu, Xiong & Qi, Shixiong & Wang, Zhao & Duan, Chao & Wang, Xiuli & Li, Furong, 2019. "Optimal scheduling for microgrids with hydrogen fueling stations considering uncertainty using data-driven approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Chang, Miguel & Lund, Henrik & Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2023. "Perspectives on purpose-driven coupling of energy system models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    10. Cantú, Victor H. & Ponsich, Antonin & Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine & Carrera, Eduardo, 2023. "Capturing spatial, time-wise and technological detail in hydrogen supply chains: A bi-level multi-objective optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    11. Umair Yaqub Qazi, 2022. "Future of Hydrogen as an Alternative Fuel for Next-Generation Industrial Applications; Challenges and Expected Opportunities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-40, June.
    12. Siavashi, Majid & Hosseini, Farzad & Talesh Bahrami, Hamid Reza, 2021. "A new design with preheating and layered porous ceramic for hydrogen production through methane steam reforming process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    13. Ioannis Kountouris & Rasmus Bramstoft & Theis Madsen & Juan Gea-Bermúdez & Marie Münster & Dogan Keles, 2024. "A unified European hydrogen infrastructure planning to support the rapid scale-up of hydrogen production," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2020. "The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: Insights from integrated value chain optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    15. Gardumi, F. & Keppo, I. & Howells, M. & Pye, S. & Avgerinopoulos, G. & Lekavičius, V. & Galinis, A. & Martišauskas, L. & Fahl, U. & Korkmaz, P. & Schmid, D. & Montenegro, R. Cunha & Syri, S. & Hast, A, 2022. "Carrying out a multi-model integrated assessment of European energy transition pathways: Challenges and benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    16. Matsuo, Yuhji & Endo, Seiya & Nagatomi, Yu & Shibata, Yoshiaki & Komiyama, Ryoichi & Fujii, Yasumasa, 2020. "Investigating the economics of the power sector under high penetration of variable renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    17. Herc, Luka & Pfeifer, Antun & Duić, Neven, 2022. "Optimization of the possible pathways for gradual energy system decarbonization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 617-633.
    18. Laura Torralba-Díaz & Christoph Schimeczek & Matthias Reeg & Georgios Savvidis & Marc Deissenroth-Uhrig & Felix Guthoff & Benjamin Fleischer & Kai Hufendiek, 2020. "Identification of the Efficiency Gap by Coupling a Fundamental Electricity Market Model and an Agent-Based Simulation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Panagiotis Fragkos & Pelopidas Siskos, 2022. "Energy Systems Analysis and Modelling towards Decarbonisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-4, March.
    20. Lifeng Du & Yanmei Yang & Luli Zhou & Min Liu, 2024. "Greenhouse Gas Reduction Potential and Economics of Green Hydrogen via Water Electrolysis: A Systematic Review of Value-Chain-Wide Decarbonization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-37, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:181:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523002665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.