IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v156y2021ics0301421521002792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative economic analysis of technological priorities for low-carbon transformation of electric power industry in Russia and the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Veselov, Fedor
  • Pankrushina, Tatiana
  • Khorshev, Andrey

Abstract

This paper explores the differences in technological priorities for decarbonization of the Russian and the European power sectors up to 2040 and investigates the main drivers of such differences. We used updated cost and performance data to conduct a comparative analysis of technologies based on levelized cost of electricity. Calculation of carbon avoided costs allowed us to found the pool of cost-efficient low-carbon technologies for the Russian power industry as well as the level of carbon prices needed to support their development. Also, we have explained the reasons which cause differences in decarbonization priorities in Russia and Europe. We have also investigated the impact of system requirements (and associated costs) in terms of capacity availability and its operating modes on the competitiveness of renewable energy sources and conventional power plants. Consideration of these requirements and costs improves the quality of power system planning and policy-making processes under the strict limits on greenhouse gas emissions. Based on performed analysis we suggest economically reasonable decarbonization strategy of the Russian power industry as well as the necessary level of carbon prices/taxes for various low- and non-carbon technologies to support their development.

Suggested Citation

  • Veselov, Fedor & Pankrushina, Tatiana & Khorshev, Andrey, 2021. "Comparative economic analysis of technological priorities for low-carbon transformation of electric power industry in Russia and the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:156:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521002792
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421521002792
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vogt-Schilb, Adrien & Hallegatte, Stéphane, 2014. "Marginal abatement cost curves and the optimal timing of mitigation measures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 645-653.
    2. Ang, B.W. & Su, Bin, 2016. "Carbon emission intensity in electricity production: A global analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 56-63.
    3. Prakash, Vrishab & Ghosh, Sajal & Kanjilal, Kakali, 2020. "Costs of avoided carbon emission from thermal and renewable sources of power in India and policy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Chunbo Ma and Atakelty Hailu, 2016. "The Marginal Abatement Cost of Carbon Emissions in China," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(China Spe).
    5. Lai, Chun Sing & McCulloch, Malcolm D., 2017. "Levelized cost of electricity for solar photovoltaic and electrical energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 191-203.
    6. Webb, Jeremy & de Silva, H. Nadeeka & Wilson, Clevo, 2020. "The future of coal and renewable power generation in Australia: A review of market trends," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 363-378.
    7. Sotiriou, Chryso & Michopoulos, Apostolos & Zachariadis, Theodoros, 2019. "On the cost-effectiveness of national economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions abatement measures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 519-529.
    8. Sekar, Ram C. & Parsons, John E. & Herzog, Howard J. & Jacoby, Henry D., 2007. "Future carbon regulations and current investments in alternative coal-fired power plant technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1064-1074, February.
    9. Chryso Sotiriou & Theodoros Zachariadis, 2019. "Optimal Timing of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Abatement in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Alexandra G. Papadopoulou & George Vasileiou & Alexandros Flamos, 2020. "A Comparison of Dispatchable RES Technoeconomics: Is There a Niche for Concentrated Solar Power?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Chang, Youngho & Li, Yanfei, 2015. "Renewable energy and policy options in an integrated ASEAN electricity market: Quantitative assessments and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 39-49.
    12. Kuik, Onno & Brander, Luke & Tol, Richard S.J., 2009. "Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions: A meta-analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1395-1403, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding, Yihong & Tan, Qinliang & Shan, Zijing & Han, Jian & Zhang, Yimei, 2023. "A two-stage dispatching optimization strategy for hybrid renewable energy system with low-carbon and sustainability in ancillary service market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 647-659.
    2. M. N. Uzyakov & A. Yu. Kolpakov & B. N. Porfiriev & A. A. Galinger & A. A. Yantovskii, 2023. "Materials and Energy Intensity of the Global Carbon Neutrality," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 335-341, June.
    3. Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Jingyun & Wang, Bo & Hui, Ng Szu & Lu, Bin & Wang, Can & Xu, Shuling & Zhou, Zixuan & Zhang, Bin & Zheng, Yufeng, 2024. "The decarbonization pathway of power system by high-resolution model under different policy scenarios in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    4. Kilinc-Ata, Nurcan & Proskuryakova, Liliana N., 2023. "Empirical analysis of the Russian power industry's transition to sustainability," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Yuguo Jiang & Enock Mintah Ampaw & Hongyan Wu & Lan Zhao, 2023. "The Effects of System Pressure on Low-Carbon Innovation in Firms: A Case Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Kolpakov, A. & Yantovskii, A. & Galinger, A., 2022. "Cost of achieving zero CO2 emissions by mid-century: Approach and estimation for the world largest economies," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 55(3), pages 139-154.
    7. Jin, Jingliang & Wen, Qinglan & Zhao, Liya & Zhou, Chaoyang & Guo, Xiaojun, 2023. "Measuring environmental performance of power dispatch influenced by low-carbon approaches," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 325-339.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sotiriou, Chryso & Michopoulos, Apostolos & Zachariadis, Theodoros, 2019. "On the cost-effectiveness of national economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions abatement measures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 519-529.
    2. Chryso Sotiriou & Theodoros Zachariadis, 2019. "Optimal Timing of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Abatement in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Wu, F. & Wang, S.Y. & Zhou, P., 2023. "Marginal abatement cost of carbon dioxide emissions: The role of abatement options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 891-901.
    4. Vassilis Stavrakas & Nikos Kleanthis & Alexandros Flamos, 2020. "An Ex-Post Assessment of RES-E Support in Greece by Investigating the Monetary Flows and the Causal Relationships in the Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-29, September.
    5. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Sikharulidze, Anna & Karapoghosyan, Eduard & Shatvoryan, Suren, 2017. "Development of marginal abatement cost curves for the building sector in Armenia and Georgia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 29-43.
    6. Breyer, Christian & Koskinen, Otto & Blechinger, Philipp, 2015. "Profitable climate change mitigation: The case of greenhouse gas emission reduction benefits enabled by solar photovoltaic systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 610-628.
    7. Ma, Chunbo & Hailu, Atakelty & You, Chaoying, 2019. "A critical review of distance function based economic research on China’s marginal abatement cost of carbon dioxide emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Koecklin, Manuel Tong & Longoria, Genaro & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Curtis, John, 2021. "Public acceptance of renewable electricity generation and transmission network developments: Insights from Ireland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Chen Shi & Yujiao Xian & Zhixin Wang & Ke Wang, 2023. "Marginal abatement cost curve of carbon emissions in China: a functional data analysis," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Saujot, Mathieu & Lefèvre, Benoit, 2016. "The next generation of urban MACCs. Reassessing the cost-effectiveness of urban mitigation options by integrating a systemic approach and social costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 124-138.
    11. Richard Tol, 2011. "Regulating knowledge monopolies: the case of the IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 827-839, October.
    12. Zhu, Bangzhu & Su, Bin & Li, Yingzhu & Ng, Tsan Sheng, 2020. "Embodied energy and intensity in China’s (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2005-2015," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Klingelhöfer, Heinz Eckart, 2009. "Investments in EOP-technologies and emissions trading - Results from a linear programming approach and sensitivity analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 370-383, July.
    14. Le Sun & Congmou Zhu & Shaofeng Yuan & Lixia Yang & Shan He & Wuyan Li, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Agricultural Carbon Emission Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Du, Limin & Hanley, Aoife & Wei, Chu, 2015. "Estimating the Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of CO2 Emissions in China: Provincial Panel Data Analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 217-229.
    16. Tong Koecklin, Manuel & Fitiwi, Desta & de Carolis, Joseph F. & Curtis, John, 2020. "Renewable electricity generation and transmission network developments in light of public opposition: Insights from Ireland," Papers WP653, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    17. Chen, Hao & Cui, Jian & Song, Feng & Jiang, Zhigao, 2022. "Evaluating the impacts of reforming and integrating China's electricity sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Tol, Richard S.J., 2012. "A cost–benefit analysis of the EU 20/20/2020 package," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 288-295.
    19. Johan Lilliestam & Anthony Patt & Germán Bersalli, 2022. "On the quality of emission reductions: observed effects of carbon pricing on investments, innovation, and operational shifts. A response to van den Bergh and Savin (2021)," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(3), pages 733-758, November.
    20. Pablo Pintos & Pedro Linares, 2016. "Assessing the EU ETS with an Integrated Model," Working Papers 01-2016, Economics for Energy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:156:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521002792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.