IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v109y2017icp767-781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition

Author

Listed:
  • Sovacool, Benjamin K.
  • Kivimaa, Paula
  • Hielscher, Sabine
  • Jenkins, Kirsten

Abstract

The Smart Meter Implementation Program (SMIP) lays the legal framework in the United Kingdom so that a smart gas and electricity meter, along with an in-home display, can be installed in every household by 2020. Intended to reduce household energy consumption by 5–15%, the SMIP represents the world's largest and most expensive smart meter rollout. However, a series of obstacles and delays has restricted implementation. To explore why, this study investigates the socio-technical challenges facing the SMIP, with a strong emphasis on the “social” side of the equation. It explains its two primary sources of data, a systematic review of the academic literature coupled with observation of seven major SMIP events. It offers a history of the SMIP rollout, including a summary of 67 potential benefits as well as often-discussed technical challenges, before delving into pertinent non-technical challenges, specifically vulnerability as well as consumer resistance and ambivalence. In doing so, the paper not only presents a critique of SMIP, it also offers a review of academic studies on consumer responses to smart meters, an analysis of the intersection between smart meters and other social concerns such as poverty or the marginalization of rural areas, and the generation of policy lessons.

Suggested Citation

  • Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Kivimaa, Paula & Hielscher, Sabine & Jenkins, Kirsten, 2017. "Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 767-781.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:109:y:2017:i:c:p:767-781
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421517304688
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Editors, 2014. "Software updates," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 14(4), pages 997-997, December.
    2. Robinson, A.P. & Blythe, P.T. & Bell, M.C. & Hübner, Y. & Hill, G.A., 2013. "Analysis of electric vehicle driver recharging demand profiles and subsequent impacts on the carbon content of electric vehicle trips," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 337-348.
    3. Congressional Budget Office, 2014. "Updated Budget Projections: 2014 to 2024," Reports 45229, Congressional Budget Office.
    4. Buchanan, Kathryn & Russo, Riccardo & Anderson, Ben, 2015. "The question of energy reduction: The problem(s) with feedback," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 89-96.
    5. Al-Wakeel, Ali & Wu, Jianzhong & Jenkins, Nick, 2016. "State estimation of medium voltage distribution networks using smart meter measurements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 207-218.
    6. Editors, 2014. "Software updates," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 14(2), pages 451-451, June.
    7. Sorrell, Steve, 2007. "Improving the evidence base for energy policy: The role of systematic reviews," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1858-1871, March.
    8. Zhang, T. & Nuttall, W.J., 2008. "Evaluating Government’s Policies on Promoting Smart Metering in Retail Electricity Markets via Agent Based Simulation," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0842, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    9. Poghosyan, Anush & Greetham, Danica Vukadinović & Haben, Stephen & Lee, Tamsin, 2015. "Long term individual load forecast under different electrical vehicles uptake scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 699-709.
    10. Congressional Budget Office, 2014. "Updated Budget Projections: 2014 to 2024," Reports 45229, Congressional Budget Office.
    11. Congressional Budget Office, 2014. "Updated Budget Projections: 2014 to 2024," Reports 45229, Congressional Budget Office.
    12. Buchanan, Kathryn & Banks, Nick & Preston, Ian & Russo, Riccardo, 2016. "The British public’s perception of the UK smart metering initiative: Threats and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 87-97.
    13. Editors, 2014. "Software updates," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 14(3), pages 701-701, September.
    14. Staffell, Iain, 2017. "Measuring the progress and impacts of decarbonising British electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 463-475.
    15. Stephen D. Thomas, 2012. "Not Too Smart an Innovation: Britain's Plans to Switch Consumers to Smart Electricity and Gas Meters," Energy & Environment, , vol. 23(6-7), pages 1057-1074, October.
    16. Congressional Budget Office, 2014. "Updated Budget Projections: 2014 to 2024," Reports 45229, Congressional Budget Office.
    17. Jenni Viitanen & Paul Connell & Martine Tommis, 2015. "Creating Smart Neighborhoods: Insights from Two Low-Carbon Communities in Sheffield and Leeds, United Kingdom," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 19-41, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felix Reichling & Shinichi Nishiyama, 2015. "The Costs to Different Generations of Policies That Close the Fiscal Gap: Working Paper 2015-10," Working Papers 51097, Congressional Budget Office.
    2. William R. Cline, 2014. "Sustainability of Public Debt in the United States and Japan," Working Paper Series WP14-9, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    3. Ronald Brisebois & Apollinaire Nadembega & Alain Abran, 2017. "Real Time Software Energy Consumption Measurement in the Context of Green Software," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 43, pages 175-184.
    4. Knowles, William & Prince, Daniel & Hutchison, David & Disso, Jules Ferdinand Pagna & Jones, Kevin, 2015. "A survey of cyber security management in industrial control systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 52-80.
    5. Lim, Zhen-Wen & Goh, Kim-Leng, 2019. "Natural gas industry transformation in Peninsular Malaysia: The journey towards a liberalised market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 197-211.
    6. Milchram, Christine & Hillerbrand, Rafaela & van de Kaa, Geerten & Doorn, Neelke & Künneke, Rolf, 2018. "Energy Justice and Smart Grid Systems: Evidence from the Netherlands and the United Kingdom," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1244-1259.
    7. Parrish, Bryony & Heptonstall, Phil & Gross, Rob & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2020. "A systematic review of motivations, enablers and barriers for consumer engagement with residential demand response," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. David Fredericks & Zhong Fan & Sandra Woolley & Ed de Quincey & Mike Streeton, 2020. "A Decade On, How Has the Visibility of Energy Changed? Energy Feedback Perceptions from UK Focus Groups," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Carmichael, R. & Gross, R. & Hanna, R. & Rhodes, A. & Green, T., 2021. "The Demand Response Technology Cluster: Accelerating UK residential consumer engagement with time-of-use tariffs, electric vehicles and smart meters via digital comparison tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Katarzyna Byrka, 2019. "Determinants of the Willingness to Energy Monitoring by Residential Consumers: A Case Study in the City of Wroclaw in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Rüdisüli, Martin & Romano, Elliot & Eggimann, Sven & Patel, Martin K., 2022. "Decarbonization strategies for Switzerland considering embedded greenhouse gas emissions in electricity imports," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    12. Osorio, Sebastian & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Pahle, Michael & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2020. "How to deal with the risks of phasing out coal in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Bowei Guo & Giorgio Castagneto Gissey, 2019. "Cost Pass-through in the British Wholesale Electricity Market: Implications of Brexit and the ETS reform," Working Papers EPRG1937, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    14. Chankook Park & Wan Gyu Heo & Myung Eun Lee, 2024. "Study on Consumers’ Perceived Benefits and Risks of Smart Energy System," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 288-300, May.
    15. Rentier, Gerrit & Lelieveldt, Herman & Kramer, Gert Jan, 2019. "Varieties of coal-fired power phase-out across Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 620-632.
    16. Gorbach, O.G. & Kost, C. & Pickett, C., 2022. "Review of internal carbon pricing and the development of a decision process for the identification of promising Internal Pricing Methods for an Organisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Weron, Tomasz & Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna & Weron, Rafał, 2018. "The role of educational trainings in the diffusion of smart metering platforms: An agent-based modeling approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 591-600.
    18. R. Vincent Pohl, 2018. "Medicaid And The Labor Supply Of Single Mothers: Implications For Health Care Reform," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(3), pages 1283-1313, August.
    19. Chengxiang Zhuge & Chunfu Shao & Xia Li, 2019. "Empirical Analysis of Parking Behaviour of Conventional and Electric Vehicles for Parking Modelling: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Penelope Buckley, 2020. "Prices, information and nudges for residential electricity conservation : A meta-analysis," Post-Print hal-02500507, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:109:y:2017:i:c:p:767-781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.