IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v136y2024ics0140988324004298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental policy stringency and ecological footprint linkage: Mitigation measures of renewable energy and innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Sohag, Kazi
  • Husain, Shaiara
  • Soytas, Ugur

Abstract

We scrutinize the environmental policies' efficacy in reducing ecological footprint by interweaving two other vibrant parameters of environmental degradation mitigation, i.e., renewable energy sources and innovation. To this end, we apply a Cross-Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lags (CS-ARDL) approach to analyze panel time-series data (1990–2018) in the context of OECD countries. Our analysis shows that environmental policy significantly reduces ecological footprint through renewable energy and innovation channels. Our findings also support the idea that environmental policy's effectiveness is conditional on countries' bio-capacity surplus/deficit and the level of industrialization. The overall findings hold up well in the presence of cross-sectional dependence, short-run heterogeneity, and long-run homogeneity under the respective sample. Our findings underscore the need for more stringent environmental policies, supported by technological advancements and clean energy initiatives, to mitigate the impact of human economic activities on natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohag, Kazi & Husain, Shaiara & Soytas, Ugur, 2024. "Environmental policy stringency and ecological footprint linkage: Mitigation measures of renewable energy and innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324004298
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324004298
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324004298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.