IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v136y2024ics0140988324004171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market volatilities vs oil shocks: Which dominate the relative performance of green bonds?

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Yu
  • Shi, Chunpei
  • Zhou, Chunyan
  • Wang, Qian
  • Liu, Yuntong
  • Wang, Yizhi

Abstract

The market performance of green bonds determines whether they will make a significant contribution to future financial markets and sustainable investment. It is therefore important to conduct a thorough study of the dominant factors affecting the market performance of green bonds, particularly their performance relative to conventional bonds. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to investigate and compare the impact of market volatilities (mainly VIX, OVX, and MOVE) and oil shocks (including supply shock, demand shock, and speculative demand shock) on the relative performance of green bonds. The main findings indicate that when volatilities coincide with oil shocks, the former consistently exert a more pronounced influence on the relative performance of green bonds. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the post-COVID-19 period. Concerning crude oil shocks, oil supply and demand shocks have opposite effects on the relative performance of green bonds, with the supply shock having a negative impact and the demand shock having a positive impact. Furthermore, our analysis shows that volatilities and oil shocks tend to have significant effects on the relative performance of green bonds during periods of heightened market risk aversion, while their impact remains negligible in a stable market environment. The empirical results may provide novel insights and significant implications for the further development of the green bond market.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Yu & Shi, Chunpei & Zhou, Chunyan & Wang, Qian & Liu, Yuntong & Wang, Yizhi, 2024. "Market volatilities vs oil shocks: Which dominate the relative performance of green bonds?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324004171
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324004171
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green bond; Relative performance; Uncertainty; Market volatilities; Crude oil shocks;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324004171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.