IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v315y2024i2p454-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A simulation-based approximate dynamic programming approach to dynamic and stochastic resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Satic, U.
  • Jacko, P.
  • Kirkbride, C.

Abstract

We consider the dynamic and stochastic resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem which allows for the random arrival of projects and stochastic task durations. Completing projects generates rewards, which are reduced by a tardiness cost in the case of late completion. Multiple types of resource are available, and projects consume different amounts of these resources when under processing. The problem is modelled as an infinite-horizon discrete-time Markov decision process and seeks to maximise the expected discounted long-run profit. We use an approximate dynamic programming algorithm (ADP) with a linear approximation model which can be used for online decision making. Our approximation model uses project elements that are easily accessible by a decision-maker, with the model coefficients obtained offline via a combination of Monte Carlo simulation and least squares estimation. Our numerical study shows that ADP often statistically significantly outperforms the optimal reactive baseline algorithm (ORBA). In experiments on smaller problems however, both typically perform suboptimally compared to the optimal scheduler obtained by stochastic dynamic programming. ADP has an advantage over ORBA and dynamic programming in that ADP can be applied to larger problems. We also show that ADP generally produces statistically significantly higher profits than common algorithms used in practice, such as a rule-based algorithm and a reactive genetic algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Satic, U. & Jacko, P. & Kirkbride, C., 2024. "A simulation-based approximate dynamic programming approach to dynamic and stochastic resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 454-469.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:315:y:2024:i:2:p:454-469
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.10.046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723008214
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.10.046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philipp Melchiors & Roel Leus & Stefan Creemers & Rainer Kolisch, 2018. "Dynamic order acceptance and capacity planning in a stochastic multi-project environment with a bottleneck resource," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 459-475, January.
    2. Izack Cohen & Boaz Golany & Avraham Shtub, 2005. "Managing Stochastic, Finite Capacity, Multi-Project Systems through the Cross-Entropy Methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 183-199, February.
    3. Hongbo Li & Xianchao Zhang & Jinshuai Sun & Xuebing Dong, 2023. "Dynamic resource levelling in projects under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(1), pages 198-218, January.
    4. Paul S. Adler & Avi Mandelbaum & Viên Nguyen & Elizabeth Schwerer, 1995. "From Project to Process Management: An Empirically-Based Framework for Analyzing Product Development Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 458-484, March.
    5. Ugur Satic & Peter Jacko & Christopher Kirkbride, 2022. "Performance evaluation of scheduling policies for the dynamic and stochastic resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 1411-1423, February.
    6. Warren B. Powell, 2009. "What you should know about approximate dynamic programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 239-249, April.
    7. Davis, Michael T. & Robbins, Matthew J. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Approximate dynamic programming for missile defense interceptor fire control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 873-886.
    8. Vishal Ahuja & John R. Birge, 2020. "An Approximation Approach for Response-Adaptive Clinical Trial Design," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 877-894, October.
    9. Rainer Kolisch & Arno Sprecher & Andreas Drexl, 1995. "Characterization and Generation of a General Class of Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(10), pages 1693-1703, October.
    10. Schütz, Hans-Jörg & Kolisch, Rainer, 2012. "Approximate dynamic programming for capacity allocation in the service industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 239-250.
    11. Li, Haitao & Womer, Norman K., 2015. "Solving stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problems by closed-loop approximate dynamic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 20-33.
    12. Kolisch, Rainer & Sprecher, Arno, 1996. "PSPLIB - a project scheduling problem library," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 396, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    13. M. Berke Pamay & Kerem Bülbül & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2014. "Dynamic Resource Constrained Multi-Project Scheduling Problem with Weighted Earliness/Tardiness Costs," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: P. Simin Pulat & Subhash C. Sarin & Reha Uzsoy (ed.), Essays in Production, Project Planning and Scheduling, edition 127, chapter 10, pages 219-247, Springer.
    14. Stefan Creemers, 2015. "Minimizing the expected makespan of a project with stochastic activity durations under resource constraints," Post-Print hal-02992649, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salim Rostami & Stefan Creemers & Roel Leus, 2018. "New strategies for stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 349-365, June.
    2. Sönke Hartmann, 1998. "A competitive genetic algorithm for resource‐constrained project scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(7), pages 733-750, October.
    3. Dayal Madhukar & Verma, Sanjay, 2015. "Multi-processor Exact Procedures for Regular Measures of the Multi-mode RCPSP," IIMA Working Papers WP2015-03-25, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    4. V. Van Peteghem & M. Vanhoucke, 2009. "Using Resource Scarceness Characteristics to Solve the Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/595, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    5. Sprecher, Arno, 2000. "SALBLIB: Challenging instances for assembly line balancing," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 526, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    6. Illana Bendavid & Boaz Golany, 2011. "Setting gates for activities in the stochastic project scheduling problem through the cross entropy methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 25-42, September.
    7. Gehring, Marco & Volk, Rebekka & Schultmann, Frank, 2022. "On the integration of diverging material flows into resource‐constrained project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1071-1087.
    8. Sprecher, Arno & Drexl, Andreas, 1998. "Multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling by a simple, general and powerful sequencing algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 431-450, June.
    9. Hartmann, Sönke, 1997. "Project scheduling with multiple modes: A genetic algorithm," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 435, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    10. Nursel Kavlak & Gündüz Ulusoy & Funda Sivrikaya Şerifoğlu & Ş. İlker Birbil, 2009. "Client‐contractor bargaining on net present value in project scheduling with limited resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 93-112, March.
    11. Sönke Hartmann, 2002. "A self‐adapting genetic algorithm for project scheduling under resource constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(5), pages 433-448, August.
    12. Peteghem, Vincent Van & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 409-418, March.
    13. He, Zhengwen & Wang, Nengmin & Jia, Tao & Xu, Yu, 2009. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 688-696, November.
    14. Zhengwen He & Nengmin Wang & Pengxiang Li, 2014. "Simulated annealing for financing cost distribution based project payment scheduling from a joint perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 203-220, February.
    15. Balouka, Noemie & Cohen, Izack, 2021. "A robust optimization approach for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 457-470.
    16. Van Peteghem, Vincent & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2014. "An experimental investigation of metaheuristics for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem on new dataset instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 62-72.
    17. Sepehr Proon & Mingzhou Jin, 2011. "A genetic algorithm with neighborhood search for the resource‐constrained project scheduling problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(2), pages 73-82, March.
    18. Stefan Creemers, 2019. "The preemptive stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Post-Print hal-02992618, HAL.
    19. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    20. Coelho, José & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2011. "Multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling using RCPSP and SAT solvers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 73-82, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:315:y:2024:i:2:p:454-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.