IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v287y2020i1p280-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing electricity mix for CO2 emissions reduction: A robust input-output linear programming model

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Jidong
  • Ng, Tsan Sheng
  • Su, Bin

Abstract

Input-Output Linear Programming (IO-LP) model has been recently used to identify a cost-effective strategy for reduction in economy-wide CO2 emissions through a shift in the electricity generation mix. As an extension, this study further develops a robust IO-LP model to address the data uncertainties of technology cost and final demand. Compared to the deterministic IO-LP model which seeks to minimize the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), the robust IO-LP model aims to maximize the tolerance of data uncertainty under a dynamic uncertainty setting. The modelling results in case study of China show that coal-fired and hydro generation technologies should be greatly developed from 2020 to 2050 in the Business-As-Usual (BAU) scenario with no emissions target set. In order to mitigate accumulated economy-wide CO2 emissions by 30% compared to the BAU emissions level, various types of clean generation technologies, i.e., gas-fired, hydro, nuclear, solar, wind, and biomass, should be introduced into the electricity mix. Along with the decrease in emissions target, the tolerance of data uncertainty will drop to a certain degree. Finally, we compared results of the robust IO-LP model with results of the stochastic and deterministic IO-LP models. The comparative analysis shows that the robust IO-LP model tends to select the generation technologies with smaller uncertainty in LCOE, and is able to improve the robustness of capacity planning solutions compared to the alternative models under data uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Jidong & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2020. "Optimizing electricity mix for CO2 emissions reduction: A robust input-output linear programming model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 280-292.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:287:y:2020:i:1:p:280-292
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172030360X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Lindner & J. Legault & D. Guan, 2013. "Disaggregating The Electricity Sector Of China'S Input-Output Table For Improved Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 300-320, September.
    2. Ang, B.W. & Su, Bin, 2016. "Carbon emission intensity in electricity production: A global analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 56-63.
    3. Oliveira, Carla & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler, 2011. "A multi-objective multi-sectoral economy–energy–environment model: Application to Portugal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2856-2866.
    4. Wang, Hongye & Su, Bin & Mu, Hailin & Li, Nan & Gui, Shusen & Duan, Ye & Jiang, Bo & Kong, Xue, 2020. "Optimal way to achieve renewable portfolio standard policy goals from the electricity generation, transmission, and trading perspectives in southern China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Henriques, C. Oliveira & Antunes, C. Henggeler, 2012. "Interactions of economic growth, energy consumption and the environment in the context of the crisis – A study with uncertain data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 415-422.
    6. Lara, Cristiana L. & Mallapragada, Dharik S. & Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. & Venkatesh, Aranya & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2018. "Deterministic electric power infrastructure planning: Mixed-integer programming model and nested decomposition algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1037-1054.
    7. de Carvalho, Ariovaldo Lopes & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Freire, Fausto, 2016. "Economic-energy-environment analysis of prospective sugarcane bioethanol production in Brazil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 514-526.
    8. Ruiz, C. & Conejo, A.J., 2015. "Robust transmission expansion planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 390-401.
    9. Munoz, F.D. & Hobbs, B.F. & Watson, J.-P., 2016. "New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 888-898.
    10. Oliveira, Carla & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler, 2004. "A multiple objective model to deal with economy-energy-environment interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 370-385, March.
    11. Michaja Pehl & Anders Arvesen & Florian Humpenöder & Alexander Popp & Edgar G. Hertwich & Gunnar Luderer, 2017. "Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 939-945, December.
    12. Parpas, Panos & Webster, Mort, 2014. "A stochastic multiscale model for electricity generation capacity expansion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 359-374.
    13. Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Barilea, Ivan U. & Culaba, Alvin B. & Cruz, Jose B., 2012. "A fuzzy multi-regional input–output optimization model for biomass production and trade under resource and footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 154-160.
    14. Wang, Hongye & Su, Bin & Mu, Hailin & Li, Nan & Jiang, Bo & Kong, Xue, 2019. "Optimization of electricity generation and interprovincial trading strategies in Southern China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 696-707.
    15. He, Peijun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2015. "Energy import resilience with input–output linear programming models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 215-226.
    16. He, Peijun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2017. "Energy-economic recovery resilience with Input-Output linear programming models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 177-191.
    17. Li, Ying & Lukszo, Zofia & Weijnen, Margot, 2015. "The implications of CO2 price for China’s power sector decarbonization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 53-64.
    18. Borges, Ana Rosa & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler, 2003. "A fuzzy multiple objective decision support model for energy-economy planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 304-316, March.
    19. Boffino, Luigi & Conejo, Antonio J. & Sioshansi, Ramteen & Oggioni, Giorgia, 2019. "A two-stage stochastic optimization planning framework to decarbonize deeply electric power systems," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Song, Junnian & Yang, Wei & Higano, Yoshiro & Wang, Xian’en, 2015. "Dynamic integrated assessment of bioenergy technologies for energy production utilizing agricultural residues: An input–output approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 178-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kang, Jidong & Wu, Zhuochun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2023. "A stochastic-robust optimization model for inter-regional power system planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1234-1248.
    2. Andrea Marchioni & Carlo Alberto Magni & Davide Baschieri, 2020. "Investment and Financing Perspectives for a Solar Photovoltaic Project," MIC 2020: The 20th Management International Conference,, University of Primorska Press.
    3. Tan, Qinliang & Han, Jian & Liu, Yuan, 2023. "Examining the synergistic diffusion process of carbon capture and renewable energy generation technologies under market environment: A multi-agent simulation analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Han Wang & Zhenghui Fu & Shulan Wang & Wenjie Zhang, 2021. "Analysis of CO 2 Emissions in the Whole Production Process of Coal-Fired Power Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Yanfeng Li & Yongping Li & Guohe Huang & Rubing Zheng, 2022. "Inter-Provincial Electricity Trading and Its Effects on Carbon Emissions from the Power Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Kang, Jidong & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin & Milovanoff, Alexandre, 2021. "Electrifying light-duty passenger transport for CO2 emissions reduction: A stochastic-robust input–output linear programming model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Jinpeng Liu & Delin Wei, 2020. "Analysis and Measurement of Carbon Emission Aggregation and Spillover Effects in China: Based on a Sectoral Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Xiaoxiang Xu & Mingqiu Liao, 2022. "Prediction of China’s Economic Structural Changes under Carbon Emission Constraints: Based on the Linear Programming Input–Output (LP-IO) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Zhang, Kai & Zhang, Yiyi & Xi, Shan & Liu, Jiefeng & Li, Jiashuo & Hou, Shengren & Chen, Bin, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of energy-water nexus from spatial resource reallocation perspective in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    10. Zhang, Shuo & Yu, Yadong & Kharrazi, Ali & Ren, Hongtao & Ma, Tieju, 2022. "How can structural change contribute to concurrent sustainability policy targets on GDP, emissions, energy, and employment in China?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    11. Mirzaee, Ashkan & McGarvey, Ronald G. & Aguilar, Francisco X., 2024. "Feasibility of satisfying projected biopower demands in support of decarbonization interventions: A spatially-explicit cost optimization model applied to woody biomass in the eastern US," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Magni, Carlo Alberto & Marchioni, Andrea & Baschieri, Davide, 2022. "Impact of financing and payout policy on the economic profitability of solar photovoltaic plants," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    13. Rahim, Sahar & Wang, Zhen & Ju, Ping, 2022. "Overview and applications of Robust optimization in the avant-garde energy grid infrastructure: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    14. Wu, Zhuochun & Kang, Jidong & Mosteiro-Romero, Martín & Bartolini, Andrea & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2024. "A distributionally robust optimization model for building-integrated photovoltaic system expansion planning under demand and irradiance uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    15. Wang, Yizhong & Jeong, Sujong & Hang, Ye & Wang, Qunwei, 2024. "Multi-sector environmental efficiency and productivity: A general Leontief optimization method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han Wang & Zhenghui Fu & Shulan Wang & Wenjie Zhang, 2021. "Analysis of CO 2 Emissions in the Whole Production Process of Coal-Fired Power Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Soares, N. & Martins, A.G. & Carvalho, A.L. & Caldeira, C. & Du, C. & Castanheira, É. & Rodrigues, E. & Oliveira, G. & Pereira, G.I. & Bastos, J. & Ferreira, J.P. & Ribeiro, L.A. & Figueiredo, N.C. & , 2018. "The challenging paradigm of interrelated energy systems towards a more sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 171-193.
    3. C. Oliveira & D. Coelho & C. H. Antunes, 2016. "Coupling input–output analysis with multiobjective linear programming models for the study of economy–energy–environment–social (E3S) trade-offs: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 471-502, December.
    4. Kang, Jidong & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin & Milovanoff, Alexandre, 2021. "Electrifying light-duty passenger transport for CO2 emissions reduction: A stochastic-robust input–output linear programming model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Oliveira, C. & Coelho, D. & Pereira da Silva, P. & Antunes, C.H., 2013. "How many jobs can the RES-E sectors generate in the Portuguese context?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 444-455.
    6. de Carvalho, Ariovaldo Lopes & Henggeler Antunes, Carlos & Freire, Fausto & Oliveira Henriques, Carla, 2016. "A multi-objective interactive approach to assess economic-energy-environment trade-offs in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1429-1442.
    7. He, Peijun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2019. "Energy-economic resilience with multi-region input–output linear programming models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. de Carvalho, Ariovaldo Lopes & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Freire, Fausto, 2016. "Economic-energy-environment analysis of prospective sugarcane bioethanol production in Brazil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 514-526.
    9. Carvalho, Ariovaldo Lopes de & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Freire, Fausto & Henriques, Carla Oliveira, 2015. "A hybrid input–output multi-objective model to assess economic–energy–environment trade-offs in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 769-785.
    10. Boglioni, Michele & Zambelli, Stefano, 2018. "Specialization patterns and reduction of CO2 emissions. An empirical investigation of environmental preservation and economic efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 134-149.
    11. Skolfield, J. Kyle & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2022. "Operations research in optimal power flow: A guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 387-404.
    12. Kang, Jidong & Wu, Zhuochun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2023. "A stochastic-robust optimization model for inter-regional power system planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1234-1248.
    13. Henriques, C. Oliveira & Antunes, C. Henggeler, 2012. "Interactions of economic growth, energy consumption and the environment in the context of the crisis – A study with uncertain data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 415-422.
    14. Pao, Hsiao-Tien & Chen, Haipeng (Allan) & Li, Yi-Ying, 2015. "Competitive dynamics of energy, environment, and economy in the U.S," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 449-460.
    15. Li, Carmen & Chyong, Chi Kong & Reiner, David M. & Roques, Fabien, 2024. "Taking a Portfolio approach to wind and solar deployment: The case of the National Electricity Market in Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    16. Wei Yang & Junnian Song & Yoshiro Higano & Jie Tang, 2015. "An Integrated Simulation Model for Dynamically Exploring the Optimal Solution to Mitigating Water Scarcity and Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Bai, Bo & Wang, Yihan & Fang, Cong & Xiong, Siqin & Ma, Xiaoming, 2021. "Efficient deployment of solar photovoltaic stations in China: An economic and environmental perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Xiaomin Xu & Dongxiao Niu & Jinpeng Qiu & Peng Wang & Yanchao Chen, 2016. "Analysis and Optimization of Power Supply Structure Based on Markov Chain and Error Optimization for Renewable Energy from the Perspective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, July.
    19. San Cristóbal, José Ramón, 2012. "A goal programming model for environmental policy analysis: Application to Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 303-307.
    20. Ambrosius, Mirjam & Egerer, Jonas & Grimm, Veronika & van der Weijde, Adriaan H., 2022. "Risk aversion in multilevel electricity market models with different congestion pricing regimes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:287:y:2020:i:1:p:280-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.