IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v284y2020i1p152-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust global sourcing under compliance legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Mazahir, Shumail
  • Ardestani-Jaafari, Amir

Abstract

Concerns about the environment, public health, and safety are driving governments around the world to restrict access to their markets of products, which may present environmental/health risks. As a result, legislation in many countries requires that firms comply with specific environmental and safety standards before introducing their products in these markets. However, there is no unified global standard, and a set of local rules governs most of the markets. Therefore, products complying with the regulations of one market may not be compliant with the standards laid out in the other. This means that large firms must include the local regulatory requirements of their targeted markets into account when making their sourcing decisions. The rise in the enforcement of compliance legislation has overlapped with an increase in the trend of global sourcing, where manufacturers have opted for a diversified and offshore supplier base. With the issue of compliance legislation in place, the suppliers who otherwise would produce functionally identical products become differentiable based on their ability to fulfill compliance requirements of the targeted markets. Also, the suppliers have incentives to exaggerate their compliance ability or may lack the technical capability to ascertain this information completely. Therefore, there always resides a degree of uncertainty about a supplier’s actual compliance capability. On the market side, there is uncertainty concerning product demand in individual markets. These two sources of uncertainty make this a rather challenging problem. We propose a formulation of supplier selection and product allocation decisions in this problem based on a two-stage robust optimization method. Through a set of numerical experiments, we discuss some exciting insights about the role of uncertainty in compliance failure on overall profitability and flexibility in the supply chain. We show that 3% supply-side uncertainty has almost the same effect on the quality of worst-case profit as 30% deviation from the nominal demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Mazahir, Shumail & Ardestani-Jaafari, Amir, 2020. "Robust global sourcing under compliance legislation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 152-163.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:284:y:2020:i:1:p:152-163
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.12.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221719310203
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.12.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    2. David Simchi‐Levi & He Wang & Yehua Wei, 2018. "Increasing Supply Chain Robustness through Process Flexibility and Inventory," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1476-1491, August.
    3. Dagmara Nawrocka, 2008. "Environmental supply chain management, ISO 14001 and RoHS. How are small companies in the electronics sector managing?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 349-360, November.
    4. Michael K. Lim & Achal Bassamboo & Sunil Chopra & Mark S. Daskin, 2013. "Facility Location Decisions with Random Disruptions and Imperfect Estimation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 239-249, May.
    5. David Simchi-Levi & Nikolaos Trichakis & Peter Yun Zhang, 2019. "Designing Response Supply Chain Against Bioattacks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1246-1268, September.
    6. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    7. Baghalian, Atefeh & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2013. "Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 199-215.
    8. An, Yu & Zeng, Bo & Zhang, Yu & Zhao, Long, 2014. "Reliable p-median facility location problem: two-stage robust models and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 54-72.
    9. Cheng, Chun & Qi, Mingyao & Zhang, Ying & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2018. "A two-stage robust approach for the reliable logistics network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 185-202.
    10. Joel Goh & Melvyn Sim, 2011. "Robust Optimization Made Easy with ROME," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 973-985, August.
    11. David Simchi-Levi & William Schmidt & Yehua Wei & Peter Yun Zhang & Keith Combs & Yao Ge & Oleg Gusikhin & Michael Sanders & Don Zhang, 2015. "Identifying Risks and Mitigating Disruptions in the Automotive Supply Chain," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 375-390, October.
    12. Maqbool Dada & Nicholas C. Petruzzi & Leroy B. Schwarz, 2007. "A Newsvendor's Procurement Problem when Suppliers Are Unreliable," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 9-32, August.
    13. Plambeck, Erica L. & Taylor, Terry A., 2015. "Supplier Evasion of a Buyer's Audit: Implications for Motivating Supplier Social and Environmental Responsibility," Research Papers 3176, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Chun & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2021. "Robust facility location under demand uncertainty and facility disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Novak, Antonin & Sucha, Premysl & Novotny, Matej & Stec, Richard & Hanzalek, Zdenek, 2022. "Scheduling jobs with normally distributed processing times on parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 422-441.
    3. Judit Oláh & Nemer Aburumman & József Popp & Muhammad Asif Khan & Hossam Haddad & Nicodemus Kitukutha, 2020. "Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Cheng, Chun & Yu, Qinxiao & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2024. "Distributionally robust facility location with uncertain facility capacity and customer demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Metzker Soares, Paula & Thevenin, Simon & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2024. "Adaptive robust optimization for lot-sizing under yield uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 513-526.
    3. Bo Feng & Zheyu Jiang & Fujun Lai, 2020. "Robust approach for air cargo freight forwarder selection under disruption," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 339-360, August.
    4. Alikhani, Reza & Torabi, S.Ali & Altay, Nezih, 2021. "Retail supply chain network design with concurrent resilience capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    5. Mohammaddust, Faeghe & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Mofidfar, Mohammad & Hill, Alex, 2017. "Developing lean and responsive supply chains: A robust model for alternative risk mitigation strategies in supply chain designs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 632-653.
    6. Lu, Xiaohan & Cheng, Chun, 2021. "Locating facilities with resiliency to capacity failures and correlated demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    7. Deng, Menghua & Bian, Bomin & Zhou, Yanlin & Ding, Jianpeng, 2023. "Distributionally robust production and replenishment problem for hydrogen supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    9. Lai, Xiaofan & Wu, Lingxiao & Wang, Kai & Wang, Fan, 2022. "Robust ship fleet deployment with shipping revenue management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 169-196.
    10. Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil & Ryan, Sarah M. & Kabir, Elnaz, 2016. "Hybrid robust and stochastic optimization for closed-loop supply chain network design using accelerated Benders decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 76-92.
    11. Berger, Niklas & Schulze-Schwering, Stefan & Long, Elisa & Spinler, Stefan, 2023. "Risk management of supply chain disruptions: An epidemic modeling approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1036-1051.
    12. Cheng, Chun & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2021. "Robust facility location under demand uncertainty and facility disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Moghadam, Hani Shahmoradi, 2016. "Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-149.
    14. Shin, Youngchul & Lee, Sangyoon & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2021. "Robust multiperiod inventory model with a new type of buy one get one promotion: “My Own Refrigerator”," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Surya Prakash & Sameer Kumar & Gunjan Soni & Vipul Jain & Ajay Pal Singh Rathore, 2020. "Closed-loop supply chain network design and modelling under risks and demand uncertainty: an integrated robust optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 837-864, July.
    16. Yanıkoğlu, İhsan & Gorissen, Bram L. & den Hertog, Dick, 2019. "A survey of adjustable robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 799-813.
    17. Zhang, Guowei & Jia, Ning & Zhu, Ning & He, Long & Adulyasak, Yossiri, 2023. "Humanitarian transportation network design via two-stage distributionally robust optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. Ming Zhao & Nickolas Freeman & Kai Pan, 2023. "Robust Sourcing Under Multilevel Supply Risks: Analysis of Random Yield and Capacity," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 178-195, January.
    19. Mengshi Lu & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2021. "A Review of Robust Operations Management under Model Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1927-1943, June.
    20. Amir Ardestani-Jaafari & Erick Delage, 2021. "Linearized Robust Counterparts of Two-Stage Robust Optimization Problems with Applications in Operations Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1138-1161, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:284:y:2020:i:1:p:152-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.