IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v277y2019i2p469-478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value of sharing disaggregated information in supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Kovtun, Vladimir
  • Giloni, Avi
  • Hurvich, Clifford

Abstract

We study a two-stage supply chain where the retailer observes two demand streams coming from two consumer populations. We further assume that each demand sequence is a stationary Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) process with respect to a Gaussian white noise sequence (shocks). The shock sequences for the two populations could be contemporaneously correlated. We show that it is typically optimal for the retailer to construct its order to its supplier based on forecasts for each demand stream (as opposed to the sum of the streams) and that doing so is never sub-optimal. We demonstrate that the retailer’s order to its supplier is ARMA and yet can be constructed as the sum of two ARMA order processes based upon the two populations. When there is no information sharing, the supplier only observes the retailer’s order which is the aggregate of the two aforementioned processes. In this paper, we determine when there is value to sharing the retailer’s individual orders, and when there is additional value to sharing the retailer’s individual demand sequences. In order to determine the magnitude of the value of information sharing we show how to compute the supplier’s mean squared forecast error under no sharing, order sharing, and demand sharing.

Suggested Citation

  • Kovtun, Vladimir & Giloni, Avi & Hurvich, Clifford, 2019. "The value of sharing disaggregated information in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 469-478.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:277:y:2019:i:2:p:469-478
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221719301821
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kohn, Robert, 1982. "When is an aggregate of a time series efficiently forecast by its past?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 337-349, April.
    2. Hau L. Lee & Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang, 2000. "The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 626-643, May.
    3. Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2001. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain: A Note on its Value when Demand Is Nonstationary," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 605-610, April.
    4. Boray Huang & Seyed M. R. Iravani, 2005. "Production Control Policies in Supply Chains with Selective-Information Sharing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 662-674, August.
    5. Vishal Gaur & Avi Giloni & Sridhar Seshadri, 2005. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain Under ARMA Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 961-969, June.
    6. Vladimir Kovtun & Avi Giloni & Clifford Hurvich, 2014. "Assessing the value of demand sharing in supply chains," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(7), pages 515-531, October.
    7. Ruomeng Cui & Hyoduk Shin, 2018. "Sharing Aggregate Inventory Information with Customers: Strategic Cross-Selling and Shortage Reduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 381-400, January.
    8. Bian, Wenliang & Shang, Jennifer & Zhang, Juliang, 2016. "Two-way information sharing under supply chain competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 82-94.
    9. Avi Giloni & Clifford Hurvich & Sridhar Seshadri, 2014. "Forecasting and information sharing in supply chains under ARMA demand," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 35-54.
    10. Xiaolong Zhang, 2004. "Evolution of ARMA Demand in Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 195-198, April.
    11. Yossi Aviv, 2007. "On the Benefits of Collaborative Forecasting Partnerships Between Retailers and Manufacturers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 777-794, May.
    12. Mümin Kurtuluş & Sezer Ülkü & Beril L. Toktay, 2012. "The Value of Collaborative Forecasting in Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 82-98, January.
    13. Ruomeng Cui & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2015. "Information Sharing in Supply Chains: An Empirical and Theoretical Valuation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(11), pages 2803-2824, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weidong Zhang & Fuqiang Wang, 2022. "Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Carbon Emissions Reduction Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Jiali Wang & Xue Peng & Yunan Du & Fulin Wang, 2022. "A tripartite evolutionary game research on information sharing of the subjects of agricultural product supply chain with a farmer cooperative as the core enterprise," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 159-177, January.
    3. Lu, Jizhou & Feng, Gengzhong & Shum, Stephen & Lai, Kin Keung, 2021. "On the value of information sharing in the presence of information errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1139-1152.
    4. Ni, Jian & Xu, Yue & Shi, Jia & Li, Jiali, 2024. "Product innovation in a supply chain with information asymmetry: Is more private information always worse?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 229-240.
    5. Vladimir Kovtun & Avi Giloni & Clifford Hurvich & Sridhar Seshadri, 2023. "Pivot Clustering to Minimize Error in Forecasting Aggregated Demand Streams Each Following an Autoregressive Moving Average Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-28, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Jizhou & Feng, Gengzhong & Shum, Stephen & Lai, Kin Keung, 2021. "On the value of information sharing in the presence of information errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1139-1152.
    2. Vladimir Kovtun & Avi Giloni & Clifford Hurvich, 2014. "Assessing the value of demand sharing in supply chains," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(7), pages 515-531, October.
    3. Babai, M.Z. & Boylan, J.E. & Syntetos, A.A. & Ali, M.M., 2016. "Reduction of the value of information sharing as demand becomes strongly auto-correlated," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 130-135.
    4. Tliche, Youssef & Taghipour, Atour & Canel-Depitre, Béatrice, 2020. "An improved forecasting approach to reduce inventory levels in decentralized supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 511-527.
    5. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2009. "Information Sharing and Order Variability Control Under a Generalized Demand Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 781-797, May.
    6. Zhang, Xiaolong & Burke, Gerard J., 2011. "Analysis of compound bullwhip effect causes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 514-526, May.
    7. Ali, Mohammad M. & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Boylan, John E. & Syntetos, A.A., 2017. "Supply chain forecasting when information is not shared," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 984-994.
    8. Tliche, Y. & Taghipour, A. & Canel-Depitre, B., 2019. "Downstream Demand Inference in decentralized supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 65-77.
    9. Wang, Xun & Disney, Stephen M., 2016. "The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 691-701.
    10. Ma, Yungao & Wang, Nengmin & He, Zhengwen & Lu, Jizhou & Liang, Huigang, 2015. "Analysis of the bullwhip effect in two parallel supply chains with interacting price-sensitive demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 815-825.
    11. Ramanathan, Usha & Muyldermans, Luc, 2010. "Identifying demand factors for promotional planning and forecasting: A case of a soft drink company in the UK," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 538-545, December.
    12. Graça, Paula & Camarinha-Matos, Luís M., 2017. "Performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems — Literature review and trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 237-255.
    13. Bin Shen & Hau-Ling Chan, 2017. "Forecast Information Sharing for Managing Supply Chains in the Big Data Era: Recent Development and Future Research," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Li Chen & Wei Luo & Kevin Shang, 2017. "Measuring the Bullwhip Effect: Discrepancy and Alignment Between Information and Material Flows," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 36-51, February.
    15. Tetsuo Iida & Paul Zipkin, 2010. "Competition and Cooperation in a Two-Stage Supply Chain with Demand Forecasts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1350-1363, October.
    16. Ramanathan, Usha, 2013. "Aligning supply chain collaboration using Analytic Hierarchy Process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 431-440.
    17. M M Ali & J E Boylan, 2011. "Feasibility principles for Downstream Demand Inference in supply chains," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(3), pages 474-482, March.
    18. Li, Tian & Zhang, Hongtao, 2015. "Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    19. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    20. Karimi, Majid & Zaerpour, Nima, 2022. "Put your money where your forecast is: Supply chain collaborative forecasting with cost-function-based prediction markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1035-1049.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:277:y:2019:i:2:p:469-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.