IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v269y2018i1p99-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data envelopment analysis cross-like efficiency model for non-homogeneous decision-making units: The case of United States companies’ low-carbon investment to attain corporate sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Weiwei
  • Yu, Yu
  • Sun, Panpan

Abstract

Traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models assume directly comparability among decision-making units (DMUs). However, this assumption is not necessarily applied in practice; DMUs do not always utilize similar inputs to produce similar outputs. Sometimes, a DMU may not choose to produce a certain output (e.g., a steel plant may not produce tool steels) or cannot produce the certain output for some certain reasons. Meanwhile, DMUs may choose different resources to achieve the general productions or services (e.g., papermaker mills consume different raw materials to produce paper). How to compare a DMU to other units objectively becomes an issue when evaluating efficiency in the absence of homogeneity. In this study, a cross-like efficiency model for the DEA of non-homogeneous DMUs is established to handle the aforementioned issue. The proposed method can even assign unique rankings to DMUs with missing outputs or inputs. Furthermore, prior information on the appropriate bound for the share of resources is not needed. The proposed model is applied to an existing data set used in previous studies. 39 companies on S&P 500 corporations in 2013 are also studied with this model. It is confirmed that investors focus on the company's green thoughts and long-term sustainability by the empirical investigation. Furthermore, this study shows that the Information Technology sector has the highest low-carbon investment performance among the nine sectors investigated. The measurement of low-carbon technology investment can be an available benchmark for a specific industry to attain corporate sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Weiwei & Yu, Yu & Sun, Panpan, 2018. "Data envelopment analysis cross-like efficiency model for non-homogeneous decision-making units: The case of United States companies’ low-carbon investment to attain corporate sustainability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 99-110.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:269:y:2018:i:1:p:99-110
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717307191
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Wang, Derek, 2014. "Radial and non-radial approaches for environmental assessment by Data Envelopment Analysis: Corporate sustainability and effective investment for technology innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 537-551.
    2. Yu, Yu & Wang, Derek D. & Li, Shanling & Shi, Qinfen, 2016. "Assessment of U.S. firm-level climate change performance and strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 432-443.
    3. Liang, Liang & Cook, Wade D. & Zhu, Joe, 2016. "DEA models for non-homogeneous DMUs with different input configurationsAuthor-Name: Li, WangHong," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 946-956.
    4. T Kuosmanen, 2009. "Data envelopment analysis with missing data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1767-1774, December.
    5. Haas, David A. & Murphy, Frederic H., 2003. "Compensating for non-homogeneity in decision-making units in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 530-544, February.
    6. Wade D. Cook & Julie Harrison & Raha Imanirad & Paul Rouse & Joe Zhu, 2013. "Data Envelopment Analysis with Nonhomogeneous DMUs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 666-676, June.
    7. Tobias S. Schmidt, 2014. "Low-carbon investment risks and de-risking," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 237-239, April.
    8. Cook, Wade D. & Harrison, Julie & Rouse, Paul & Zhu, Joe, 2012. "Relative efficiency measurement: The problem of a missing output in a subset of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 79-84.
    9. Wu, Jie & Chu, Junfei & Sun, Jiasen & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2016. "DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 571-579.
    10. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    11. Imanirad, Raha & Cook, Wade D. & Aviles-Sacoto, Sonia Valeria & Zhu, Joe, 2015. "Partial input to output impacts in DEA: The case of DMU-specific impacts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 837-844.
    12. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Wang, Derek, 2014. "Sustainability development for supply chain management in U.S. petroleum industry by DEA environmental assessment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 360-374.
    13. Wang Hong Li & Liang Liang & Sonia Valeria Avilés-Sacoto & Raha Imanirad & Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu, 2017. "Modeling efficiency in the presence of multiple partial input to output processes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(1), pages 235-248, March.
    14. Ya Chen & Yongjun Li & Huaqing Wu & Liang Liang, 2014. "Data Envelopment Analysis With Missing Data: A Multiple Linear Regression Analysis Approach," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 137-153.
    15. Wang, Derek & Li, Shanling & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2014. "DEA environmental assessment on U.S. Industrial sectors: Investment for improvement in operational and environmental performance to attain corporate sustainability," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 254-267.
    16. C Kao & S-Tai Liu, 2000. "Data envelopment analysis with missing data: an application to University libraries in Taiwan," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(8), pages 897-905, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stergiou, Eirini, 2022. "Environmental Efficiency of European Industries across Sectors and Countries," MPRA Paper 114635, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Liu, Runxi & Huang, Runyao & Shen, Ziheng & Wang, Hongtao & Xu, Jin, 2021. "Optimizing the recovery pathway of a net-zero energy wastewater treatment model by balancing energy recovery and eco-efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    3. Yong Tan & Mike G. Tsionas, 2022. "Modelling sustainability efficiency in banking," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3754-3772, July.
    4. Cao, Ting & Cook, Wade D. & Kristal, M. Murat, 2022. "Has the technological investment been worth it? Assessing the aggregate efficiency of non-homogeneous bank holding companies in the digital age," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Jianhui Xie & Qiwei Xie & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang, 2021. "Solving data envelopment analysis models with sum-of-fractional objectives: a global optimal approach based on the multiparametric disaggregation technique," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 453-480, September.
    6. Zeng, Ximei & Zhou, Zhongbao & Gong, Yeming & Liu, Wenbin, 2022. "A data envelopment analysis model integrated with portfolio theory for energy mix adjustment: Evidence in the power industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Zhaojun Yang & Xiaoting Guo & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang, 2021. "Contextual and organizational factors in sustainable supply chain decision making: grey relational analysis and interpretative structural modeling," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12056-12076, August.
    8. Josef Jablonský, 2019. "Data Envelopment Analysis Models in Non-Homogeneous Environment," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(6), pages 1535-1540.
    9. Xiong, Xi & Yang, Guo-liang & Guan, Zhong-cheng, 2020. "A parallel DEA-based method for evaluating parallel independent subunits with heterogeneous outputs," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josef Jablonský, 2019. "Data Envelopment Analysis Models in Non-Homogeneous Environment," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(6), pages 1535-1540.
    2. Xiang Ji & Jie Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Jiasen Sun, 2019. "Using a hybrid heterogeneous DEA method to benchmark China’s sustainable urbanization: an empirical study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 281-335, July.
    3. Wu, Jie & Li, Mingjun & Zhu, Qingyuan & Zhou, Zhixiang & Liang, Liang, 2019. "Energy and environmental efficiency measurement of China's industrial sectors: A DEA model with non-homogeneous inputs and outputs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 468-480.
    4. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2015. "Environmental assessment on coal-fired power plants in U.S. north-east region by DEA non-radial measurement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 125-139.
    5. Chu, Junfei & Wu, Jie & Chu, Chengbin & Zhang, Tinglong, 2020. "DEA-based fixed cost allocation in two-stage systems: Leader-follower and satisfaction degree bargaining game approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Hsiao-Yen Mao & Wen-Min Lu & Hsin-Yen Shieh, 2023. "Exploring the Influence of Environmental Investment on Multinational Enterprises’ Performance from the Sustainability and Marketability Efficiency Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan, 2015. "China's regional sustainability and diversified resource allocation: DEA environmental assessment on economic development and air pollution," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 239-256.
    8. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan, 2016. "Returns to damage under undesirable congestion and damages to return under desirable congestion measured by DEA environmental assessment with multiplier restriction: Economic and energy planning for s," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 288-309.
    9. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan, 2016. "Marginal Rate of Transformation and Rate of Substitution measured by DEA environmental assessment: Comparison among European and North American nations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 270-287.
    10. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Liu, Jing-Yue & Su, Bin, 2020. "Carbon congestion effects in China's industry: Evidence from provincial and sectoral levels," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Derek Wang & Tianchi Li, 2018. "Carbon Emission Performance of Independent Oil and Natural Gas Producers in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Ang, Sheng & Chen, Chien-Ming, 2016. "Pitfalls of decomposition weights in the additive multi-stage DEA model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 139-153.
    13. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2015. "DEA environmental assessment in time horizon: Radial approach for Malmquist index measurement on petroleum companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 329-345.
    14. Ma-Lin Song & Ron Fisher & Jian-Lin Wang & Lian-Biao Cui, 2018. "Environmental performance evaluation with big data: theories and methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 459-472, November.
    15. Emrouznejad, Ali & De Witte, Kristof, 2010. "COOPER-framework: A unified process for non-parametric projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1573-1586, December.
    16. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2016. "Undesirable congestion under natural disposability and desirable congestion under managerial disposability in U.S. electric power industry measured by DEA environmental assessment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 173-188.
    17. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2015. "Japanese fuel mix strategy after disaster of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant: Lessons from international comparison among industrial nations measured by DEA environmental assessment in time hori," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PA), pages 87-103.
    18. Wu, Jie & Chu, Junfei & Sun, Jiasen & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2016. "DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 571-579.
    19. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan & Li, Aijun & Wang, Daoping, 2017. "Methodological comparison among radial, non-radial and intermediate approaches for DEA environmental assessment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 439-453.
    20. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan & Goto, Mika, 2017. "A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 104-124.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:269:y:2018:i:1:p:99-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.