IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v238y2014i3p711-723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single-commodity robust network design problem: Complexity, instances and heuristic solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Álvarez-Miranda, Eduardo
  • Cacchiani, Valentina
  • Lodi, Andrea
  • Parriani, Tiziano
  • Schmidt, Daniel R.

Abstract

We study a single-commodity Robust Network Design problem (RND) in which an undirected graph with edge costs is given together with a discrete set of balance matrices, representing different supply/demand scenarios. In each scenario, a subset of the nodes is exchanging flow. The goal is to determine the minimum cost installation of capacities on the edges such that the flow exchange is feasible for every scenario. Previously conducted computational investigations on the problem motivated the study of the complexity of some special cases and we present complexity results on them, including hypercubes. In turn, these results lead to the definition of new instances (random graphs with {−1,0,1} balances) that are computationally hard for the natural flow formulation. These instances are then solved by means of a new heuristic algorithm for RND, which consists of three phases. In the first phase the graph representing the network is reduced by heuristically deleting a subset of the arcs, and a feasible solution is built. The second phase consists of a neighborhood search on the reduced graph based on a Mixed-Integer (Linear) Programming (MIP) flow model. Finally, the third phase applies a proximity search approach to further improve the solution, taking into account the original graph. The heuristic is tested on the new instances, and the comparison with the solutions obtained by Cplex on a natural flow formulation shows the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Álvarez-Miranda, Eduardo & Cacchiani, Valentina & Lodi, Andrea & Parriani, Tiziano & Schmidt, Daniel R., 2014. "Single-commodity robust network design problem: Complexity, instances and heuristic solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(3), pages 711-723.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:238:y:2014:i:3:p:711-723
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.04.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171400349X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.04.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    2. Sara Mattia, 2013. "The robust network loading problem with dynamic routing," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 619-643, April.
    3. Edward Rothberg, 2007. "An Evolutionary Algorithm for Polishing Mixed Integer Programming Solutions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 534-541, November.
    4. ,, 2000. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 287-299, April.
    5. ORTEGA , Francisco & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 2003. "A branch-and-cut algorithm for the single-commodity, uncapacitated, fixed-charge network flow problem," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1611, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siqian Shen & Mingdi You & Yintai Ma, 2017. "Single‐commodity stochastic network design under demand and topological uncertainties with insufficient data," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 154-173, March.
    2. Ashwin Arulselvan & Mohsen Rezapour, 2017. "Exact Approaches for Designing Multifacility Buy-at-Bulk Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 597-611, November.
    3. Filipe Rodrigues & Agostinho Agra & Lars Magnus Hvattum & Cristina Requejo, 2021. "Weighted proximity search," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 459-496, June.
    4. Matthews, Logan R. & Gounaris, Chrysanthos E. & Kevrekidis, Ioannis G., 2019. "Designing networks with resiliency to edge failures using two-stage robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 704-720.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    2. Stefan Mišković, 2017. "A VNS-LP algorithm for the robust dynamic maximal covering location problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(4), pages 1011-1033, October.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Agni Orfanoudaki, 2021. "Algorithmic Insurance," Papers 2106.00839, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    4. Rafael Epstein & Andres Neely & Andres Weintraub & Fernando Valenzuela & Sergio Hurtado & Guillermo Gonzalez & Alex Beiza & Mauricio Naveas & Florencio Infante & Fernando Alarcon & Gustavo Angulo & Cr, 2012. "A Strategic Empty Container Logistics Optimization in a Major Shipping Company," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 5-16, February.
    5. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    6. Hamed Mamani & Shima Nassiri & Michael R. Wagner, 2017. "Closed-Form Solutions for Robust Inventory Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1625-1643, May.
    7. Shunichi Ohmori, 2021. "A Predictive Prescription Using Minimum Volume k -Nearest Neighbor Enclosing Ellipsoid and Robust Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Roberto Gomes de Mattos & Fabricio Oliveira & Adriana Leiras & Abdon Baptista de Paula Filho & Paulo Gonçalves, 2019. "Robust optimization of the insecticide-treated bed nets procurement and distribution planning under uncertainty for malaria prevention and control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1045-1078, December.
    9. Soyster, A.L. & Murphy, F.H., 2013. "A unifying framework for duality and modeling in robust linear programs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 984-997.
    10. Lee, In Gyu & Yoon, Sang Won & Won, Daehan, 2022. "A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Support Vector Machine for Cost-Effective Group Feature Selection: Branch-Cut-and-Price Approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 1055-1068.
    11. Mavrotas, George & Figueira, José Rui & Siskos, Eleftherios, 2015. "Robustness analysis methodology for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems and application to project selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 142-155.
    12. Andrew Butler & Roy H. Kwon, 2021. "Data-driven integration of norm-penalized mean-variance portfolios," Papers 2112.07016, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    13. Pierre Cayet & Arash Farnoosh, 2022. "A robust structural electric system model with significant share of intermittent renewables under auto-correlated residual demand," EconomiX Working Papers 2022-6, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    14. Tao Yao & Supreet Mandala & Byung Chung, 2009. "Evacuation Transportation Planning Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 171-189, June.
    15. Aouam, Tarik & Muthuraman, Kumar & Rardin, Ronal L., 2016. "Robust optimization policy benchmarks and modeling errors in natural gas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 807-815.
    16. Mohseni, Shayan & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Sahebi, Hadi, 2016. "Robust design and planning of microalgae biomass-to-biodiesel supply chain: A case study in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 736-755.
    17. Cleber D. Rocco & Reinaldo Morabito, 2016. "Robust optimisation approach applied to the analysis of production / logistics and crop planning in the tomato processing industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 5842-5861, October.
    18. Petros Xanthopoulos & Mario Guarracino & Panos Pardalos, 2014. "Robust generalized eigenvalue classifier with ellipsoidal uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 216(1), pages 327-342, May.
    19. Nitish Umang & Michel Bierlaire & Alan L. Erera, 2017. "Real-time management of berth allocation with stochastic arrival and handling times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 67-83, February.
    20. Claire Nicolas & Stéphane Tchung-Ming & Emmanuel Hache, 2016. "Energy transition in transportation under cost uncertainty, an assessment based on robust optimization," Working Papers hal-02475943, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:238:y:2014:i:3:p:711-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.