IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v236y2014i1p37-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scheduling with few changes

Author

Listed:
  • Mütze, Torsten

Abstract

In this work we consider scheduling problems where a sequence of assignments from products to machines – or from tasks to operators, or from workers to resources – has to be determined, with the goal of minimizing the costs (=money, manpower, and/or time) that are incurred by the interplay between those assignments. To account for the different practical requirements (e.g. few changes between different products/tasks on the same machine/operator, few production disruptions, or few changes of the same worker between different resources), we employ different objective functions that are all based on elementary combinatorial properties of the schedule matrix. We propose simple and efficient algorithms to solve the corresponding optimization problems, and provide hardness results where such algorithms most likely do not exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Mütze, Torsten, 2014. "Scheduling with few changes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 37-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:236:y:2014:i:1:p:37-50
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221713009107
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Magnanti & Trilochan Sastry, 2002. "Facets and Reformulations for Solving Production Planning With Changeover Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 708-719, August.
    2. Pritibhushan Sinha, 2009. "Assignment problems with changeover cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 447-457, November.
    3. Clyde L. Monma & Chris N. Potts, 1989. "On the Complexity of Scheduling with Batch Setup Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 798-804, October.
    4. Pentico, David W., 2007. "Assignment problems: A golden anniversary survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 774-793, January.
    5. T. C. Hu & Y. S. Kuo & F. Ruskey, 1987. "Some Optimum Algorithms for Scheduling Problems with Changeover Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 94-99, February.
    6. James D. Blocher & Suresh Chand & Kaushik Sengupta, 1999. "The Changeover Scheduling Problem with Time and Cost Considerations: Analytical Results and a Forward Algorithm," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 559-569, August.
    7. Allahverdi, Ali & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2008. "A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 985-1032, June.
    8. François Vanderbeck, 1998. "Lot-Sizing with Start-Up Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(10), pages 1409-1425, October.
    9. M. Florian & J. K. Lenstra & A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, 1980. "Deterministic Production Planning: Algorithms and Complexity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 669-679, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
    2. Jans, R.F. & Degraeve, Z., 2005. "Modeling Industrial Lot Sizing Problems: A Review," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-049-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Grundel, Soesja & Çiftçi, Barış & Borm, Peter & Hamers, Herbert, 2013. "Family sequencing and cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 414-424.
    4. Dominik Kress & Maksim Barketau & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Single-machine batch scheduling to minimize the total setup cost in the presence of deadlines," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 595-606, December.
    5. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng, 2016. "Scheduling two job families on a single machine with two competitive agents," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 784-799, October.
    6. Hinder, Oliver & Mason, Andrew J., 2017. "A novel integer programing formulation for scheduling with family setup times on a single machine to minimize maximum lateness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 411-423.
    7. Kramer, Arthur & Iori, Manuel & Lacomme, Philippe, 2021. "Mathematical formulations for scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines with family setup times and total weighted completion time minimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 825-840.
    8. Pritibhushan Sinha, 2021. "Some results on an assignment problem variant," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(1), pages 144-147, March.
    9. Brahimi, Nadjib & Dauzere-Peres, Stephane & Najid, Najib M. & Nordli, Atle, 2006. "Single item lot sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Liji Shen & Lars Mönch & Udo Buscher, 2013. "An iterative approach for the serial batching problem with parallel machines and job families," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 425-448, July.
    11. F Jin & J N D Gupta & S Song & C Wu, 2010. "Single machine scheduling with sequence-dependent family setups to minimize maximum lateness," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(7), pages 1181-1189, July.
    12. Javad Rezaeian & Reza Alizadeh Foroutan & Toraj Mojibi & Yacob Khojasteh, 2023. "Sensitivity Analysis of the Unrelated Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem with Rework Processes and Machine Eligibility Restrictions," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Marko Ɖurasević & Domagoj Jakobović, 2019. "Creating dispatching rules by simple ensemble combination," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 959-1013, December.
    14. Dongni Li & Xianwen Meng & Miao Li & Yunna Tian, 2016. "An ACO-based intercell scheduling approach for job shop cells with multiple single processing machines and one batch processing machine," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 283-296, April.
    15. Bozorgirad, Mir Abbas & Logendran, Rasaratnam, 2013. "Bi-criteria group scheduling in hybrid flowshops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 599-612.
    16. Omid Shahvari & Rasaratnam Logendran & Madjid Tavana, 2022. "An efficient model-based branch-and-price algorithm for unrelated-parallel machine batching and scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 589-621, October.
    17. Amit Kumar & Anila Gupta, 2013. "Mehar’s methods for fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 27-44, March.
    18. Pritibhushan Sinha, 2009. "Assignment problems with changeover cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 447-457, November.
    19. Stan van Hoesel & H. Edwin Romeijn & Dolores Romero Morales & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2005. "Integrated Lot Sizing in Serial Supply Chains with Production Capacities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(11), pages 1706-1719, November.
    20. A. Dolgui & M. Kovalyov & K. Shchamialiova, 2011. "Multi-product lot-sizing and sequencing on a single imperfect machine," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 465-482, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:236:y:2014:i:1:p:37-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.