IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v235y2014i3p671-686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exact and approximation methods for dependability assessment of tram systems with time window

Author

Listed:
  • Kowalski, Marcin
  • Magott, Jan
  • Nowakowski, Tomasz
  • Werbińska-Wojciechowska, Sylwia

Abstract

The transportation system examined in this paper is the city tram one, where failed trams are replaced by reliable spare ones. If failed tram is repaired and delivered, then it comes back on work. There is the time window that failed tram has to be either replaced (exchanged) by spare or by repaired and delivered within. Time window is therefore paramount to user perception of transport system unreliability. Time between two subsequent failures, exchange time, and repair together with delivery time, respectively, are described by random variables A, E, and D. A/E/D is selected as the notation for these random variables. There is a finite number of spare trams. Delivery time does not depend on the number of repair facilities. Hence, repair and delivery process can be treated as one with infinite number of facilities. Undesirable event called hazard is the event: neither the replacement nor the delivery has been completed in the time window. The goal of the paper is to find the following relationships: hazard probability of the tram system and mean hazard time as functions of number of spare trams. For systems with exponential time between failures, Weibull exchange and exponential delivery (so M/W/M in the proposed notation) two accurate solutions have been found. For systems with Weibull time between failures with shape in the range from 0.9 to 1.1, Weibull exchange and exponential delivery (i.e. W/W/M) a method yielding small errors has been provided. For the most general and difficult case in which all the random variables conform to Weibull distribution (W/W/W) a method returning moderate errors has been given.

Suggested Citation

  • Kowalski, Marcin & Magott, Jan & Nowakowski, Tomasz & Werbińska-Wojciechowska, Sylwia, 2014. "Exact and approximation methods for dependability assessment of tram systems with time window," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 671-686.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:235:y:2014:i:3:p:671-686
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.01.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221714000526
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.01.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magott, Jan & Skrobanek, Pawel, 2012. "Timing analysis of safety properties using fault trees with time dependencies and timed state-charts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 14-26.
    2. Magott, Jan & Skudlarski, Kamil, 1993. "Estimating the mean completion time of PERT networks with exponentially distributed durations of activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 70-79, November.
    3. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    4. de Smidt-Destombes, Karin S. & van der Heijden, Matthieu C. & van Harten, Aart, 2006. "On the interaction between maintenance, spare part inventories and repair capacity for a k-out-of-N system with wear-out," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 182-200, October.
    5. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    6. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    7. Nakagawa, Toshio, 1984. "A summary of discrete replacement policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 382-392, September.
    8. de Smidt-Destombes, Karin S. & van der Heijden, Matthieu C. & van Harten, Aart, 2007. "Availability of k-out-of-N systems under block replacement sharing limited spares and repair capacity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 404-421, June.
    9. Cho, Danny I. & Parlar, Mahmut, 1991. "A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Wang, Wenbin & Syntetos, Aris A., 2011. "Spare parts demand: Linking forecasting to equipment maintenance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1194-1209.
    3. Zhang, Xiaohong & Zeng, Jianchao, 2017. "Joint optimization of condition-based opportunistic maintenance and spare parts provisioning policy in multiunit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 479-498.
    4. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Veldman, Jasper, 2016. "Clustering condition-based maintenance for systems with redundancy and economic dependencies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 531-540.
    5. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Mao, Weijie, 2009. "A condition-based replacement and spare provisioning policy for deteriorating systems with uncertain deterioration to failure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 184-205, April.
    6. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    7. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    8. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    9. Dilaver, Halit Metehan & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2023. "Integrated planning of asset-use and dry-docking for a fleet of maritime assets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    10. Briš, Radim & Byczanski, Petr & Goňo, Radomír & Rusek, Stanislav, 2017. "Discrete maintenance optimization of complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 80-89.
    11. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    12. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    13. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 838-848.
    14. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    15. Barlow, E. & Bedford, T. & Revie, M. & Tan, J. & Walls, L., 2021. "A performance-centred approach to optimising maintenance of complex systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 579-595.
    16. Francesco Corman & Sander Kraijema & Milinko Godjevac & Gabriel Lodewijks, 2017. "Optimizing preventive maintenance policy: A data-driven application for a light rail braking system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 534-545, October.
    17. Anahita Khojandi & Lisa M. Maillart & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Mark S. Roberts & Samir F. Saba, 2018. "Dynamic Abandon/Extract Decisions for Failed Cardiac Leads," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 633-651, February.
    18. Shahraki, Ameneh Forouzandeh & Yadav, Om Prakash & Vogiatzis, Chrysafis, 2020. "Selective maintenance optimization for multi-state systems considering stochastically dependent components and stochastic imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Sedghi, Mahdieh & Kauppila, Osmo & Bergquist, Bjarne & Vanhatalo, Erik & Kulahci, Murat, 2021. "A taxonomy of railway track maintenance planning and scheduling: A review and research trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    20. Urbani, Michele & Brunelli, Matteo & Punkka, Antti, 2023. "An approach for bi-objective maintenance scheduling on a networked system with limited resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 101-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:235:y:2014:i:3:p:671-686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.