IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v226y2013i1p115-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal resource allocation in survey designs

Author

Listed:
  • Calinescu, Melania
  • Bhulai, Sandjai
  • Schouten, Barry

Abstract

Resource allocation is a relatively new research area in survey designs and has not been fully addressed in the literature. Recently, the declining participation rates and increasing survey costs have steered research interests towards resource planning. Survey organizations across the world are considering the development of new mathematical models in order to improve the quality of survey results while taking into account optimal resource planning. In this paper, we address the problem of resource allocation in survey designs and we discuss its impact on the quality of the survey results. We propose a novel method in which the optimal allocation of survey resources is determined such that the quality of survey results, i.e., the survey response rate, is maximized. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by extensive numerical experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Calinescu, Melania & Bhulai, Sandjai & Schouten, Barry, 2013. "Optimal resource allocation in survey designs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(1), pages 115-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:226:y:2013:i:1:p:115-121
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221712008119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 1-46, February.
    2. Robert M. Groves & Steven G. Heeringa, 2006. "Responsive design for household surveys: tools for actively controlling survey errors and costs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(3), pages 439-457, July.
    3. Bretthauer, Kurt M. & Ross, Anthony & Shetty, Bala, 1999. "Nonlinear integer programming for optimal allocation in stratified sampling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 667-680, August.
    4. Kurt M. Bretthauer & Bala Shetty, 1995. "The Nonlinear Resource Allocation Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 670-683, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arne De Keyser & Yves Van Vaerenbergh, 2024. "Beyond the snafu: Research directions in customer experience-led business transformation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(1), pages 144-157, June.
    2. Chun Asaph Young & Schouten Barry & Wagner James, 2017. "JOS Special Issue on Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design: Looking Back to See Forward – Editorial: In Memory of Professor Stephen E. Fienberg, 1942–2016," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(3), pages 571-577, September.
    3. Lynn, Peter, 2013. "Targeted response inducement strategies on longitudinal surveys," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-02, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    4. Roger Tourangeau & J. Michael Brick & Sharon Lohr & Jane Li, 2017. "Adaptive and responsive survey designs: a review and assessment," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(1), pages 203-223, January.
    5. McCarthy Jaki & Wagner James & Sanders Herschel Lisette, 2017. "The Impact of Targeted Data Collection on Nonresponse Bias in an Establishment Survey: A Simulation Study of Adaptive Survey Design," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(3), pages 857-871, September.
    6. Burger Joep & Perryck Koen & Schouten Barry, 2017. "Robustness of Adaptive Survey Designs to Inaccuracy of Design Parameters," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(3), pages 687-708, September.
    7. Larissa Becker & Elina Jaakkola, 2020. "Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 630-648, July.
    8. Eltinge John L. & Biemer Paul P. & Holmberg Anders, 2013. "A Potential Framework for Integration of Architecture and Methodology to Improve Statistical Production Systems," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(1), pages 125-145, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patriksson, Michael & Strömberg, Christoffer, 2015. "Algorithms for the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem—New implementations and numerical studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 703-722.
    2. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 1-46, February.
    3. Friedrich, Ulf & Münnich, Ralf & de Vries, Sven & Wagner, Matthias, 2015. "Fast integer-valued algorithms for optimal allocations under constraints in stratified sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Sinha, Ankur & Das, Arka & Anand, Guneshwar & Jayaswal, Sachin, 2023. "A general purpose exact solution method for mixed integer concave minimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 977-992.
    5. Zhang, Bin & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "A unified method for a class of convex separable nonlinear knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 1-6, November.
    6. Sinha, Ankur & Das, Arka & Anand, Guneshwar & Jayaswal, Sachin, 2021. "A General Purpose Exact Solution Method for Mixed Integer Concave Minimization Problems," IIMA Working Papers WP 2021-03-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    7. Jirachai Buddhakulsomsiri & Parthana Parthanadee, 2008. "Stratified random sampling for estimating billing accuracy in health care systems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 41-54, March.
    8. Lee, Zu-Hsu & Deng, Shiming & Lin, Beixin & Yang, James G.S., 2010. "Decision model and analysis for investment interest expense deduction and allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 268-280, January.
    9. Jamie Fravel & Robert Hildebrand & Laurel Travis, 2024. "Continuous Equality Knapsack with Probit-Style Objectives," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 1060-1076, September.
    10. Bretthauer, Kurt M. & Shetty, Bala, 2002. "The nonlinear knapsack problem - algorithms and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 459-472, May.
    11. Sinha, Ankur & Das, Arka & Anand, Guneshwar & Jayaswal, Sachin, 2021. "A General Purpose Exact Solution Method for Mixed Integer Concave Minimization Problems (revised as on 12/08/2021)," IIMA Working Papers WP 2021-03-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    12. Weiyang Ding & Michael K. Ng & Wenxing Zhang, 2024. "A generalized alternating direction implicit method for consensus optimization: application to distributed sparse logistic regression," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 727-753, November.
    13. Reza C. Daniels, 2012. "A Framework for Investigating Micro Data Quality, with Application to South African Labour Market Household Surveys," SALDRU Working Papers 90, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    14. Reist, Benjamin M. & Rodhouse, Joseph B. & Ball, Shane T. & Young, Linda J., 2019. "Subsampling of Nonrespondents in the 2017 Census of Agriculture," NASS Research Reports 322826, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    15. Jungho Park & Hadi El-Amine & Nevin Mutlu, 2021. "An Exact Algorithm for Large-Scale Continuous Nonlinear Resource Allocation Problems with Minimax Regret Objectives," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1213-1228, July.
    16. Jiayun Jin & Caroline Vandenplas & Geert Loosveldt, 2019. "The Evaluation of Statistical Process Control Methods to Monitor Interview Duration During Survey Data Collection," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    17. Roger Tourangeau & J. Michael Brick & Sharon Lohr & Jane Li, 2017. "Adaptive and responsive survey designs: a review and assessment," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(1), pages 203-223, January.
    18. repec:iab:iabfda:201307(en is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Roberts Caroline & Vandenplas Caroline & Herzing Jessica M.E., 2020. "A Validation of R-Indicators as a Measure of the Risk of Bias using Data from a Nonresponse Follow-Up Survey," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(3), pages 675-701, September.
    20. Böhme, Marcus & Stöhr, Tobias, 2012. "Guidelines for the use of household interview duration analysis in CAPI survey management," Kiel Working Papers 1779, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    21. Chi To Ng & Mikhail Yakovlevich Kovalyov & Tai Chiu Edwin Cheng, 2008. "An FPTAS for a supply scheduling problem with non‐monotone cost functions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 194-199, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:226:y:2013:i:1:p:115-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.