IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v207y2010i2p633-643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem

Author

Listed:
  • HazIr, Öncü
  • Haouari, Mohamed
  • Erel, Erdal

Abstract

Projects are often subject to various sources of uncertainties that have a negative impact on activity durations and costs. Therefore, it is crucial to develop effective approaches to generate robust project schedules that are less vulnerable to disruptions caused by uncontrollable factors. In this paper, we investigate the robust discrete time/cost trade-off problem, which is a multi-mode project scheduling problem with important practical relevance. We introduce surrogate measures that aim at providing an accurate estimate of the schedule robustness. The pertinence of each proposed measure is assessed through computational experiments. Using the insights revealed by the computational study, we propose a two-stage robust scheduling algorithm. Finally, we provide evidence that the proposed approach can be extended to solve a complex robust problem with tardiness penalties and earliness revenues.

Suggested Citation

  • HazIr, Öncü & Haouari, Mohamed & Erel, Erdal, 2010. "Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 633-643, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:207:y:2010:i:2:p:633-643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(10)00402-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tukel, Oya I. & Rom, Walter O. & Eksioglu, Sandra Duni, 2006. "An investigation of buffer sizing techniques in critical chain scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 401-416, July.
    2. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    3. Van de Vonder, Stijn & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2008. "Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling: An experimental analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 723-733, September.
    4. Demeulemeester, Erik L. & Herroelen, Willy S. & Elmaghraby, Salah E., 1996. "Optimal procedures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 50-68, January.
    5. Al-Fawzan, M. A. & Haouari, Mohamed, 2005. "A bi-objective model for robust resource-constrained project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 175-187, May.
    6. De, Prabuddha & James Dunne, E. & Ghosh, Jay B. & Wells, Charles E., 1995. "The discrete time-cost tradeoff problem revisited," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 225-238, March.
    7. Van de Vonder, Stijn & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "The use of buffers in project management: The trade-off between stability and makespan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 227-240, August.
    8. Lambrechts, Olivier & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2008. "A tabu search procedure for developing robust predictive project schedules," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 493-508, February.
    9. Tavares, L. Valadares & Antunes Ferreira, J. A. & Silva Coelho, J., 1998. "On the optimal management of project risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 451-469, June.
    10. Akkan, Can & Drexl, Andreas & Kimms, Alf, 2005. "Network decomposition-based benchmark results for the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 339-358, September.
    11. Kobylanski, Przemyslaw & Kuchta, Dorota, 2007. "A note on the paper by M. A. Al-Fawzan and M. Haouari about a bi-objective problem for robust resource-constrained project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 496-501, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shichang Xiao & Shudong Sun & Jionghua (Judy) Jin, 2017. "Surrogate Measures for the Robust Scheduling of Stochastic Job Shop Scheduling Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    3. He, Yukang & Jia, Tao & Zheng, Weibo, 2023. "Tabu search for dedicated resource-constrained multiproject scheduling to minimise the maximal cash flow gap under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 34-52.
    4. Ingels, Jonas & Maenhout, Broos, 2019. "Optimised buffer allocation to construct stable personnel shift rosters," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 102-117.
    5. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    6. Xiong, Jian & Xing, Li-ning & Chen, Ying-wu, 2013. "Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 112-126.
    7. Said, Samer S. & Haouari, Mohamed, 2015. "A hybrid simulation-optimization approach for the robust Discrete Time/Cost Trade-off Problem," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 628-636.
    8. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui & Boris Sokolov & Frank Werner, 2016. "Schedule robustness analysis with the help of attainable sets in continuous flow problem under capacity disruptions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(11), pages 3397-3413, June.
    9. Can Akkan & Ayla Gülcü & Zeki Kuş, 2022. "Bi-criteria simulated annealing for the curriculum-based course timetabling problem with robustness approximation," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 477-501, August.
    10. Valenko Tadej & Klanšek Uroš, 2017. "An integration of spreadsheet and project management software for cost optimal time scheduling in construction," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 1627-1637, December.
    11. Jonas Ingels & Broos Maenhout, 2017. "Employee substitutability as a tool to improve the robustness in personnel scheduling," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(3), pages 623-658, July.
    12. Shichang Xiao & Zigao Wu & Hongyan Dui, 2022. "Resilience-Based Surrogate Robustness Measure and Optimization Method for Robust Job-Shop Scheduling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Junguang Zhang & Dan Wan, 2021. "Determination of early warning time window for bottleneck resource buffer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 289-305, May.
    14. Philippe Chrétienne, 2020. "Maximizing the number of jobs scheduled at their baseline starting times in case of machine failures," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 135-143, February.
    15. Gang Xuan & Win-Chin Lin & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & Wei-Lun Shen & Po-An Pan & Chih-Ling Kuo & Chin-Chia Wu, 2022. "A Robust Single-Machine Scheduling Problem with Two Job Parameter Scenarios," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Said, Samer S. & Haouari, Mohamed, 2015. "A hybrid simulation-optimization approach for the robust Discrete Time/Cost Trade-off Problem," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 628-636.
    2. HazIr, Öncü & Erel, Erdal & Günalay, Yavuz, 2011. "Robust optimization models for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 87-95, March.
    3. Xue Li & Zhengwen He & Nengmin Wang & Mario Vanhoucke, 2022. "Multimode time-cost-robustness trade-off project scheduling problem under uncertainty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1173-1202, July.
    4. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    5. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Janusz Kulejewski & Nabi Ibadov & Jerzy Rosłon & Jacek Zawistowski, 2021. "Cash Flow Optimization for Renewable Energy Construction Projects with a New Approach to Critical Chain Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Xiong, Jian & Xing, Li-ning & Chen, Ying-wu, 2013. "Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 112-126.
    8. Yangyang Liang & Nanfang Cui & Tian Wang & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "Robust resource-constrained max-NPV project scheduling with stochastic activity duration," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 219-254, March.
    9. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.
    10. He, Zhengwen & Wang, Nengmin & Jia, Tao & Xu, Yu, 2009. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 688-696, November.
    11. Farnaz Torabi Yeganeh & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi, 2020. "A multi-objective optimization approach to project scheduling with resiliency criteria under uncertain activity duration," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 161-196, February.
    12. Hongbo Li & Zhe Xu & Wenchao Wei, 2018. "Bi-Objective Scheduling Optimization for Discrete Time/Cost Trade-Off in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    15. KIlIç, Murat & Ulusoy, Gündüz & Serifoglu, Funda Sivrikaya, 2008. "A bi-objective genetic algorithm approach to risk mitigation in project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 202-216, March.
    16. Bruni, M.E. & Di Puglia Pugliese, L. & Beraldi, P. & Guerriero, F., 2017. "An adjustable robust optimization model for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 66-84.
    17. Servranckx, Tom & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "Strategies for project scheduling with alternative subgraphs under uncertainty: similar and dissimilar sets of schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 38-53.
    18. Eleni Hadjiconstantinou & Evelina Klerides, 2010. "A new path-based cutting plane approach for the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 313-336, July.
    19. Shichang Xiao & Shudong Sun & Jionghua (Judy) Jin, 2017. "Surrogate Measures for the Robust Scheduling of Stochastic Job Shop Scheduling Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    20. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:207:y:2010:i:2:p:633-643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.