IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v197y2009i2p752-763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost estimation algorithm and decision-making model for curriculum modification in educational organization

Author

Listed:
  • Kushtina, Emma
  • Zaikin, Oleg
  • Rzewski, Przemyslaw
  • Malachowski, Bartlomiej

Abstract

The decision about curriculum modification usually takes place at the knowledge level, mainly with consideration of individual academic staff competences and qualifications. However, traditional approaches to cost estimation of curriculum modification are focused on material resources only. In this paper we present a cost estimation method and decision model for curriculum modification in educational organizations. The proposed method works at the knowledge level and employs competence sets as knowledge representation models in educational organizations. Authors used the theory of hierarchical, multilevel systems in order to define the model of the decision-making process of curriculum modification and its dimension. Basing on this and also using a fuzzy competence model the cost estimation algorithm in the form of a group competences expansion algorithm is proposed. The algorithm focuses on the cost of staff competence expansion caused by the knowledge development process.

Suggested Citation

  • Kushtina, Emma & Zaikin, Oleg & Rzewski, Przemyslaw & Malachowski, Bartlomiej, 2009. "Cost estimation algorithm and decision-making model for curriculum modification in educational organization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 752-763, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:197:y:2009:i:2:p:752-763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(08)00558-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Po L. & Zhang, Dazhi, 1990. "A foundation for competence set analysis," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 251-299, December.
    2. Lee A. Freeman, 2001. "Information Systems Knowledge: Foundations, Definitions, and Applications," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 249-266, June.
    3. Li, Jian-Ming & Chiang, Chin-I & Yu, Po-Lung, 2000. "Optimal multiple stage expansion of competence set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 511-524, February.
    4. J. W. Feng & P. L. Yu, 1998. "Minimum Spanning Table and Optimal Expansion of Competence Set," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 655-679, December.
    5. Kwak, N. K. & Lee, Changwon, 1998. "A multicriteria decision-making approach to university resource allocations and information infrastructure planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 234-242, October.
    6. Alexander, Nicola A., 2000. "The missing link: an econometric analysis on the impact of curriculum standards on student achievement," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 351-361, October.
    7. Chen, Ting-Yu, 2001. "Using competence sets to analyze the consumer decision problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 98-118, January.
    8. Sanchez, Ron, 2004. "Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 518-532, May.
    9. Gomez, T. & Gonzalez, M. & Luque, M. & Miguel, F. & Ruiz, F., 2001. "Multiple objectives decomposition-coordination methods for hierarchical organizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 323-341, January.
    10. Zaikin, Oleg & Kushtina, Emma & Rozewski, Przemyslaw, 2006. "Model and algorithm of the conceptual scheme formation for knowledge domain in distance learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1379-1399, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Ting-Yu, 2002. "Expanding competence sets for the consumer decision problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 622-648, May.
    2. Po-Lung Yu & Yen-Chu Chen, 2012. "Dynamic multiple criteria decision making in changeable spaces: from habitual domains to innovation dynamics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 201-220, August.
    3. Tan, Kim Hua & Zhan, YuanZhu & Ji, Guojun & Ye, Fei & Chang, Chingter, 2015. "Harvesting big data to enhance supply chain innovation capabilities: An analytic infrastructure based on deduction graph," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 223-233.
    4. Chi-Yo Huang & Jih-Jeng Huang & You-Ning Chang & Yen-Chu Lin, 2021. "A Fuzzy-MOP-Based Competence Set Expansion Method for Technology Roadmap Definitions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Zhan, Yuanzhu & Tan, Kim Hua, 2020. "An analytic infrastructure for harvesting big data to enhance supply chain performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 559-574.
    6. Shoubin Qi & Junwen Feng, 2018. "A Revised Minimum Spanning Table Method for Expanding Competence Sets," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 7(2), pages 40-45, June.
    7. Moussa Larbani & Po Lung Yu, 2020. "Empowering Data Mining Sciences by Habitual Domains Theory, Part I: The Concept of Wonderful Solution," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 373-397, September.
    8. Kuan-Wei Huang & Jen-Hung Huang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "New Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Model for Improving Competence Sets: Enhancing a Company’s Core Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Slowak, André P., 2009. "Market fields structure & dynamics in industrial automation," FZID Discussion Papers 02-2009, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    10. Serafim Opricovic, 2009. "A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1549-1561, June.
    11. Ho, William, 2008. "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 211-228, April.
    12. Jih-Jeng Huang & Chin-Yi Chen, 2024. "Measure-Theoretic Analysis of Stochastic Competence Sets and Dynamic Shapley Values in Banach Spaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Mavrotas, G. & Diakoulaki, D. & Caloghirou, Y., 2006. "Project prioritization under policy restrictions. A combination of MCDA with 0-1 programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 296-308, May.
    14. Yanica Dimitrova, 2018. "The Culture of Innovation Model," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 39-68.
    15. Engau, Alexander, 2009. "Tradeoff-based decomposition and decision-making in multiobjective programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 883-891, December.
    16. Pierre Barbaroux & Cécile Godé, 2007. "Acquiring core capabilities through organizational learning: Illustrations from the U.S. military organizations," Post-Print hal-00293534, HAL.
    17. Ron Sanchez & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2013. "Modularity and economic organization: concepts, theory, observations, and predictions," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. D. S. Shi & P. L. Yu, 1999. "Optimal Expansion of Competence Sets with Intermediate Skills and Compound Nodes," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 643-657, September.
    19. SLUYTS, Kim & MARTENS, Rudy & MATTHYSSENS, Paul, 2008. "Towards a dynamic concept of alliance capability," Working Papers 2008019, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    20. Kwee, Z. & van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W., 2007. "Coevolutionary Competence in the Realm of Corporate Longevity: How Long-lived Firms Strategically Renew Themselves," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-076-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:197:y:2009:i:2:p:752-763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.