IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v193y2009i3p660-669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The anticipative concept in warehouse optimization using simulation in an uncertain environment

Author

Listed:
  • Kofjac, Davorin
  • Kljajic, Miroljub
  • Rejec, Valter

Abstract

The modern business environment is highly unpredictable. An anticipation approach in a real case study is presented to cope with such instability and minimize the total inventory cost without stock-outs occurring and inventory capacity being exceeded. The anticipation concept is performed using simulation models supported by inventory control algorithms on a selected sample of representative items. The inventory control algorithms include Silver-Meal, Part period balancing, Least-unit cost, and Fuzzy inventory control algorithm based on fuzzy stock-outs, highest inventory level and total cost. Transportation cost is explicitly defined as a discrete function of shipment size. The algorithms are tested on historic data. Simulation results are presented and the risk of accepting them as reliable is discussed. The process of simulation model implementation is briefly discussed to further validate the model and train order managers to use the simulation model in their order placement process.

Suggested Citation

  • Kofjac, Davorin & Kljajic, Miroljub & Rejec, Valter, 2009. "The anticipative concept in warehouse optimization using simulation in an uncertain environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 660-669, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:193:y:2009:i:3:p:660-669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)01029-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ertogral, K. & Darwish, M. & Ben-Daya, M., 2007. "Production and shipment lot sizing in a vendor-buyer supply chain with transportation cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1592-1606, February.
    2. Petrovic, Radivoj & Petrovic, Dobrila, 2001. "Multicriteria ranking of inventory replenishment policies in the presence of uncertainty in customer demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-3), pages 439-446, May.
    3. Petrovic, Dobrila & Roy, Rajat & Petrovic, Radivoj, 1999. "Supply chain modelling using fuzzy sets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 443-453, March.
    4. Petrovic, Dobrila & Roy, Rajat & Petrovic, Radivoj, 1998. "Modelling and simulation of a supply chain in an uncertain environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 299-309, September.
    5. Dey, Jayanta Kumar & Kar, Samarjit & Maiti, Manoranjan, 2005. "An interactive method for inventory control with fuzzy lead-time and dynamic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 381-397, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peidro, David & Mula, Josefa & Jiménez, Mariano & del Mar Botella, Ma, 2010. "A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 65-80, August.
    2. Wang, Juite & Shu, Yun-Feng, 2007. "A possibilistic decision model for new product supply chain design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1044-1061, March.
    3. Handfield, Robert & Warsing, Don & Wu, Xinmin, 2009. "(Q,r) Inventory policies in a fuzzy uncertain supply chain environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 609-619, September.
    4. Roozbeh Nia, Ali & Hemmati Far, Mohammad & Akhavan Niaki, Seyed Taghi, 2014. "A fuzzy vendor managed inventory of multi-item economic order quantity model under shortage: An ant colony optimization algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 259-271.
    5. Shih-Pin Chen, 2017. "Effects of fuzzy data on decision making in a competitive supply chain," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1146-1160, October.
    6. Wong, Bo K. & Lai, Vincent S., 2011. "A survey of the application of fuzzy set theory in production and operations management: 1998-2009," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 157-168, January.
    7. Mula, J. & Poler, R. & Garcia-Sabater, J.P. & Lario, F.C., 2006. "Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 271-285, September.
    8. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    9. de Kok, Ton & Grob, Christopher & Laumanns, Marco & Minner, Stefan & Rambau, Jörg & Schade, Konrad, 2018. "A typology and literature review on stochastic multi-echelon inventory models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 955-983.
    10. Bylka, StanisLaw, 2011. "Non-cooperative strategies for production and shipment lot sizing in one vendor-multi-buyer system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 372-382, May.
    11. Ben-Ammar, Oussama & Bettayeb, Belgacem & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Optimization of multi-period supply planning under stochastic lead times and a dynamic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 106-117.
    12. Preil, Deniz & Krapp, Michael, 2022. "Bandit-based inventory optimisation: Reinforcement learning in multi-echelon supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    13. San-José, Luis A. & García-Laguna, Juan, 2009. "Optimal policy for an inventory system with backlogging and all-units discounts: Application to the composite lot size model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 808-823, February.
    14. Rong, M. & Mahapatra, N.K. & Maiti, M., 2008. "A two warehouse inventory model for a deteriorating item with partially/fully backlogged shortage and fuzzy lead time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 59-75, August.
    15. Ryu, Kwangyeol & Yücesan, Enver, 2010. "A fuzzy newsvendor approach to supply chain coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 421-438, January.
    16. Mohammed, Ahmed & Wang, Qian, 2017. "The fuzzy multi-objective distribution planner for a green meat supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 47-58.
    17. M. A. Hoque & Z. A. M. S. Juman, 2024. "Decreased minimum total transportation–inventory cost bounds assuming variability in supplies and demands," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(4), pages 1888-1905, December.
    18. Qin, Zhongfeng & Ji, Xiaoyu, 2010. "Logistics network design for product recovery in fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 479-490, April.
    19. Emenike, Scholastica N. & Falcone, Gioia, 2020. "A review on energy supply chain resilience through optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Bylka, Stanislaw, 2009. "Non-cooperative strategies for production and shipments lot sizing in the vendor-buyer system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 243-252, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:193:y:2009:i:3:p:660-669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.