IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v192y2009i3p866-878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributed consensus in noncooperative inventory games

Author

Listed:
  • Bauso, Dario
  • Giarré, Laura
  • Pesenti, Raffaele

Abstract

This paper deals with repeated nonsymmetric congestion games in which the players cannot observe their payoffs at each stage. Examples of applications come from sharing facilities by multiple users. We show that these games present a unique Pareto optimal Nash equilibrium that dominates all other Nash equilibria and consequently it is also the social optimum among all equilibria, as it minimizes the sum of all the players' costs. We assume that the players adopt a best response strategy. At each stage, they construct their belief concerning others probable behavior, and then, simultaneously make a decision by optimizing their payoff based on their beliefs. Within this context, we provide a consensus protocol that allows the convergence of the players' strategies to the Pareto optimal Nash equilibrium. The protocol allows each player to construct its belief by exchanging only some aggregate but sufficient information with a restricted number of neighbor players. Such a networked information structure has the advantages of being scalable to systems with a large number of players and of reducing each player's data exposure to the competitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Bauso, Dario & Giarré, Laura & Pesenti, Raffaele, 2009. "Distributed consensus in noncooperative inventory games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 866-878, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:192:y:2009:i:3:p:866-878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)01018-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles J. Corbett, 2001. "Stochastic Inventory Systems in a Supply Chain with Asymmetric Information: Cycle Stocks, Safety Stocks, and Consignment Stock," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 487-500, August.
    2. Meca, Ana & Timmer, Judith & Garcia-Jurado, Ignacio & Borm, Peter, 2004. "Inventory games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 127-139, July.
      • Meca-Martinez, A. & Timmer, J.B. & Garcia-Jurado, I. & Borm, P.E.M., 1999. "Inventory Games," Other publications TiSEM 21f26b3f-7fae-4f19-908f-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
      • Meca, A. & Timmer, J.B. & Garcia-Jurado, I. & Borm, P.E.M., 2004. "Inventory games," Other publications TiSEM 49368f2d-02fc-49c9-9d74-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
      • Meca-Martinez, A. & Timmer, J.B. & Garcia-Jurado, I. & Borm, P.E.M., 1999. "Inventory Games," Discussion Paper 1999-53, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Qinan Wang, 2001. "Coordinating Independent Buyers in a Distribution System to Increase a Vendor's Profits," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 337-348, May.
    4. J C Fransoo & M J F Wouters & T G de Kok, 2001. "Multi-echelon multi-company inventory planning with limited information exchange," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(7), pages 830-838, July.
    5. Jorgensen, Steffen & Kort, Peter M., 2002. "Optimal pricing and inventory policies: Centralized and decentralized decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 578-600, May.
    6. Hau Lee & Seungjin Whang, 1999. "Decentralized Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: Incentives and Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 633-640, May.
    7. Martin J. Osborne & Ariel Rubinstein, 1994. "A Course in Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262650401, April.
    8. Frank Chen & Zvi Drezner & Jennifer K. Ryan & David Simchi-Levi, 2000. "Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 436-443, March.
    9. Friedman, Eric J., 1996. "Dynamics and Rationality in Ordered Externality Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 65-76, September.
    10. Sila Çetinkaya & Chung-Yee Lee, 2000. "Stock Replenishment and Shipment Scheduling for Vendor-Managed Inventory Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 217-232, February.
    11. Gérard P. Cachon, 2001. "Stock Wars: Inventory Competition in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Multiple Retailers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 658-674, October.
    12. Milchtaich, Igal, 1996. "Congestion Games with Player-Specific Payoff Functions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 111-124, March.
    13. Z Yu & H Yan & T C E Cheng, 2002. "Modelling the benefits of information sharing-based partnerships in a two-level supply chain," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(4), pages 436-446, April.
    14. Hartman, Bruce C. & Dror, Moshe & Shaked, Moshe, 2000. "Cores of Inventory Centralization Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 26-49, April.
    15. Watts, Alison, 2002. "Uniqueness of equilibrium in cost sharing games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 47-70, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meunier, Frédéric & Pradeau, Thomas, 2014. "The uniqueness property for networks with several origin–destination pairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 245-256.
    2. Stefanny Ramirez & Dario Bauso, 2021. "Dynamic Coordination Games with Activation Costs," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 580-596, September.
    3. Stefanny Ramirez & Dario Bauso, 2023. "Dynamic Games with Strategic Complements and Large Number of Players," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiuhui & Wang, Qinan, 2007. "Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(1), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Sainathan, Arvind & Groenevelt, Harry, 2019. "Vendor managed inventory contracts – coordinating the supply chain while looking from the vendor’s perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 249-260.
    3. Xu, Kefeng & Leung, Mark T., 2009. "Stocking policy in a two-party vendor managed channel with space restrictions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 271-285, February.
    4. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    5. Canan Savaskan & Charles J. Corbett, 2001. "Contracting and Coordination in Closed-Loop Supply Chains," Discussion Papers 1327, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    6. Henk Zijm & Judith Timmer, 2008. "Coordination mechanisms for inventory control in three-echelon serial and distribution systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 161-182, February.
    7. Slikker, Marco & Fransoo, Jan & Wouters, Marc, 2005. "Cooperation between multiple news-vendors with transshipments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 370-380, December.
    8. Sari, Kazim, 2008. "On the benefits of CPFR and VMI: A comparative simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 575-586, June.
    9. Flip Klijn & Marco Slikker, 2004. "Distribution Center Consolidation Games," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 602.04, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    10. Yumi Lee & Sang Hwa Song & Taesu Cheong, 2018. "The value of supply chain coordination under moral hazard: A case study of the consumer product supply chain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Barnes-Schuster, Dawn & Bassok, Yehuda & Anupindi, Ravi, 2006. "Optimizing delivery lead time/inventory placement in a two-stage production/distribution system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1664-1684, November.
    12. Zhou, Yong-Wu, 2009. "Two-echelon supply chain coordination through the unified number of annual orders," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 162-173, January.
    13. Wu, H. & Parlar, M., 2011. "Games with incomplete information: A simplified exposition with inventory management applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 562-577, October.
    14. Sarker, Bhaba R., 2014. "Consignment stocking policy models for supply chain systems: A critical review and comparative perspectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 52-67.
    15. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Joseph Geunes & Michael S. Pangburn, 2004. "Coordinating Supply Chains by Controlling Upstream Variability Propagation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 163-183, July.
    16. Li, Jun & Feng, Hairong & Zeng, Yinlian, 2014. "Inventory games with permissible delay in payments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 694-700.
    17. Dudek, Gregor & Stadtler, Hartmut, 2005. "Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chains partners," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 668-687, June.
    18. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2007. "The Price of Anarchy in Supply Chains: Quantifying the Efficiency of Price-Only Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1249-1268, August.
    19. M M Ali & J E Boylan, 2011. "Feasibility principles for Downstream Demand Inference in supply chains," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(3), pages 474-482, March.
    20. Lu, Jizhou & Feng, Gengzhong & Shum, Stephen & Lai, Kin Keung, 2021. "On the value of information sharing in the presence of information errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1139-1152.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:192:y:2009:i:3:p:866-878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.