IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v192y2009i1p243-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A two-phase ant colony algorithm for multi-echelon defective supply chain network design

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, H.S.

Abstract

Supply chain system is an integrated production system of a product. In the past researches, this system was often assumed to be an equilibrium structure, but in real production process, some members in this system usually cannot effectively complete their production task because of the losses of production, which will reduce the performance of the whole supply chain production system. This supply chain with the losses of production is called the defective supply chain (DSC) system. This research will discuss the partner selection and the production-distribution planning in this DSC network system. Besides the cost of production and transportation, the reliability of the structure and the unbalance of this system caused by the losses of production are considered. Then a germane mathematical programming model is developed for solving this problem. Due to the complex problem and in order to get a satisfactory near-optimal solution with great speed, this research proposes seeking the solution with the solving model based on ant colony algorithm. The application results in real cases show that the solving model presented by this research can quickly and effectively plan the most suitable type of the DSC network and decision-making of the production-distribution. Finally, a comparative numerical experiment is performed by using the proposed approach and the common single-phase ant colony algorithm (SAC) to demonstrate the performance of the proposed approach. The analysis results show that the proposed approach can outperform the SAC in partner selection and production-distribution planning for DSC network design.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, H.S., 2009. "A two-phase ant colony algorithm for multi-echelon defective supply chain network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 243-252, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:192:y:2009:i:1:p:243-252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)00913-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weber, Charles A. & Desai, Anand, 1996. "Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 142-155, April.
    2. Mikhailov, L., 2002. "Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 393-401, October.
    3. Hau L. Lee, 1992. "Lot Sizing to Reduce Capacity Utilization in a Production Process with Defective Items, Process Corrections, and Rework," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(9), pages 1314-1328, September.
    4. D Y Sha & Z H Che, 2006. "Supply chain network design: partner selection and production/distribution planning using a systematic model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(1), pages 52-62, January.
    5. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico, 2006. "The impact of delivery lot splitting on delivery reliability in a two-stage supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 694-708, December.
    6. Meade, L. M. & Liles, D. H. & Sarkis, J., 1997. "Justifying strategic alliances and partnering: a prerequisite for virtual enterprising," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 29-42, February.
    7. Talluri, Srinivas & Baker, R. C. & Sarkis, Joseph, 1999. "A framework for designing efficient value chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 133-144, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ovidiu Cosma & Petrică C. Pop & Cosmin Sabo, 2020. "An Efficient Hybrid Genetic Approach for Solving the Two-Stage Supply Chain Network Design Problem with Fixed Costs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Mohammad Saeid Atabaki & Mohammad Mohammadi & Bahman Naderi, 2017. "Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Invasive Weed Optimization via Priority Based Encoding for Location-Allocation Decisions in a Three-Stage Supply Chain," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(02), pages 1-44, April.
    3. Baghalian, Atefeh & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2013. "Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 199-215.
    4. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    5. Emerson, Denise & Zhou, Wei & Piramuthu, Selwyn, 2009. "Goodwill, inventory penalty, and adaptive supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 130-138, November.
    6. Yu-Chung Tsao & Qinhong Zhang & Tsung-Hui Chen, 2016. "Multi-item distribution network design problems under volume discount on transportation cost," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 426-443, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D Y Sha & Z H Che, 2006. "Supply chain network design: partner selection and production/distribution planning using a systematic model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(1), pages 52-62, January.
    2. Mikhailov, L., 2002. "Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 393-401, October.
    3. Wu, Chong & Barnes, David, 2010. "Formulating partner selection criteria for agile supply chains: A Dempster-Shafer belief acceptability optimisation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 284-293, June.
    4. Talluri, Srinivas & Baker, R. C., 2002. "A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 544-558, September.
    5. Cakravastia, Andi & Toha, Isa S. & Nakamura, Nobuto, 2002. "A two-stage model for the design of supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 231-248, December.
    6. Amorim, P. & Belo-Filho, M.A.F. & Toledo, F.M.B. & Almeder, C. & Almada-Lobo, B., 2013. "Lot sizing versus batching in the production and distribution planning of perishable goods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 208-218.
    7. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    8. K-L Hou, 2005. "Optimal production run length for deteriorating production system with a two-state continuous-time Markovian processes under allowable shortages," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(3), pages 346-350, March.
    9. Feng Yang & Dexiang Wu & Liang Liang & Gongbing Bi & Desheng Wu, 2011. "Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 195-211, May.
    10. Kris Lieckens & Nico Vandaele, 2016. "Differential evolution to solve the lot size problem in stochastic supply chain management systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 239-263, July.
    11. Jinfa Chen & David D. Yao & Shaohui Zheng, 2001. "Optimal Replenishment and Rework with Multiple Unreliable Supply Sources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 430-443, June.
    12. Degraeve, Zeger & Roodhooft, Filip, 1999. "Improving the efficiency of the purchasing process using total cost of ownership information: The case of heating electrodes at Cockerill Sambre S.A," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 42-53, January.
    13. Feng, Xuehao & Moon, Ilkyeong & Ryu, Kwangyeol, 2014. "Revenue-sharing contracts in an N-stage supply chain with reliability considerations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 20-29.
    14. Talluri, Srinivas & Narasimhan, Ram, 2003. "Vendor evaluation with performance variability: A max-min approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 543-552, May.
    15. Ivanov, Dmitry & Sokolov, Boris & Kaeschel, Joachim, 2010. "A multi-structural framework for adaptive supply chain planning and operations control with structure dynamics considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 409-420, January.
    16. Woo, Hong Seng & Saghiri, Soroosh, 2011. "Order assignment considering buyer, third-party logistics provider, and suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 144-152, April.
    17. Liao, Zhiying & Rittscher, Jens, 2007. "Integration of supplier selection, procurement lot sizing and carrier selection under dynamic demand conditions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 502-510, June.
    18. Baskaran, Venkatesan & Nachiappan, Subramanian & Rahman, Shams, 2012. "Indian textile suppliers' sustainability evaluation using the grey approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 647-658.
    19. Talluri, Srinivas, 2002. "A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 171-180, November.
    20. Hu, Kuo-Jen & Yu, Vincent F., 2016. "An integrated approach for the electronic contract manufacturer selection problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 68-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:192:y:2009:i:1:p:243-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.