IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v199y2009i1p130-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goodwill, inventory penalty, and adaptive supply chain management

Author

Listed:
  • Emerson, Denise
  • Zhou, Wei
  • Piramuthu, Selwyn

Abstract

Information visibility is generally useful for decision makers distributed across supply chains. Availability of information on inventory levels, price, lead times, demand, etc. can help reduce uncertainties as well as alleviate problems associated with bullwhip effect. A majority of extant literature in this area assume a static supply chain network configuration. While this was sufficient a few decades ago, advances in e-commerce and the ease with which order processing can be performed over the Internet necessitates appropriate dynamic (re)configuration of supply chains over time. Each node in the supply chain is modeled as an actor who makes independent decisions based on information gathered from the next level upstream. A knowledge-based framework is used for dynamic supply chain configuration and to consider the effects of inventory constraints and 'goodwill,' as well as their effects on the performance dynamics of supply chains. Preliminary results indicate that neither static nor dynamic configurations are consistently dominant. Scenarios where static configurations perform better than the modeled system are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Emerson, Denise & Zhou, Wei & Piramuthu, Selwyn, 2009. "Goodwill, inventory penalty, and adaptive supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 130-138, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:199:y:2009:i:1:p:130-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(08)00980-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bart Nooteboom, 2007. "Social capital, institutions and trust," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(1), pages 29-53.
    2. Shao, Xiao-Feng & Ji, Jian-Hua, 2009. "Effects of sourcing structure on performance in a multiple-product assemble-to-order supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 981-1000, February.
    3. Hau L. Lee & Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang, 2000. "The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 626-643, May.
    4. Troy J Strader & Fu-ren Lin & Michael J Shaw, 1998. "Simulation of Order Fulfillment in Divergent Assembly Supply Chains," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 1(2), pages 1-5.
    5. Nagarajan, Mahesh & Sosic, Greys, 2008. "Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 719-745, June.
    6. Wang, H.S., 2009. "A two-phase ant colony algorithm for multi-echelon defective supply chain network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 243-252, January.
    7. Bart Nooteboom, 2007. "Methodological interactionism: Theory and application to the firm and to the building of trust," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 137-153, September.
    8. Ming Fan & Jan Stallaert & Andrew B. Whinston, 2003. "Decentralized Mechanism Design for Supply Chain Organizations Using an Auction Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Agrawal, Sunil & Sengupta, Raghu Nandan & Shanker, Kripa, 2009. "Impact of information sharing and lead time on bullwhip effect and on-hand inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 576-593, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Om Prakash Mishra & Vikas Kumar & Dixit Garg, 2018. "Performance evaluation of JIT enabled SCM using ANP method," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(2), pages 547-558, April.
    2. Lizhen Zhan & Hui Shu & Xideng Zhou & Xiaowei Lin, 2022. "A Quality Decision Model Considering the Delay Effects in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Sarac, Aysegul & Absi, Nabil & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane, 2010. "A literature review on the impact of RFID technologies on supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 77-95, November.
    4. Deshpande, Paras & Shukla, Deepak & Tiwari, M.K., 2011. "Fuzzy goal programming for inventory management: A bacterial foraging approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 325-336, July.
    5. N. David Pifer & Christopher M. McLeod & William J. Travis & Colten R. Castleberry, 2020. "Who Should Sign a Professional Baseball Contract? Quantifying the Financial Opportunity Costs of Major League Draftees," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 21(7), pages 746-780, October.
    6. Piramuthu, Selwyn & Wochner, Sina & Grunow, Martin, 2014. "Should retail stores also RFID-tag ‘cheap’ items?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 281-291.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabitha, Devarajulu & Rajendran, Chandrasekharan & Kalpakam, S. & Ziegler, Hans, 2016. "The value of information sharing in a serial supply chain with AR(1) demand and non-zero replenishment lead times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 758-777.
    2. Babai, M.Z. & Boylan, J.E. & Syntetos, A.A. & Ali, M.M., 2016. "Reduction of the value of information sharing as demand becomes strongly auto-correlated," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 130-135.
    3. Lu, Jizhou & Feng, Gengzhong & Shum, Stephen & Lai, Kin Keung, 2021. "On the value of information sharing in the presence of information errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1139-1152.
    4. Enrique Holgado de Frutos & Juan R Trapero & Francisco Ramos, 2020. "A literature review on operational decisions applied to collaborative supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Chatfield, Dean C. & Pritchard, Alan M., 2013. "Returns and the bullwhip effect," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 159-175.
    6. Nepal, Bimal & Murat, Alper & Babu Chinnam, Ratna, 2012. "The bullwhip effect in capacitated supply chains with consideration for product life-cycle aspects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 318-331.
    7. Zbigniew Michna & Peter Nielsen, 2013. "The impact of lead time forecasting on the bullwhip effect," Papers 1309.7374, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2015.
    8. Peng, Juan & Zhou, Zhili, 2019. "Working capital optimization in a supply chain perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 846-856.
    9. Sodhi, ManMohan S. & Tang, Christopher S., 2011. "The incremental bullwhip effect of operational deviations in an arborescent supply chain with requirements planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 374-382, December.
    10. Li, Xiaojing & Chen, Jing & Ai, Xingzheng, 2019. "Contract design in a cross-sales supply chain with demand information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 939-956.
    11. Zhang, Jian & Nault, Barrie R., 2023. "Information sharing in an MTO supply chain with upstream adjustments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 97-112.
    12. Zhu, Xiaowei & Mukhopadhyay, Samar K. & Yue, Xiaohang, 2011. "Role of forecast effort on supply chain profitability under various information sharing scenarios," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 284-291, February.
    13. J. Zambujal-Oliveira, 2021. "Supply Chain Innovation Research: A Conceptual Approach of Information Management with Game Theory," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 377-394, April.
    14. Kefeng Xu & Yang Dong & Yu Xia, 2014. "‘Too Little’ or ‘Too Late’: The Timing of Supply Chain Demand Collaboration," Working Papers 0203mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    15. S. Li & Z. Yu & M. Dong, 2015. "Construct the stable vendor managed inventory partnership through a profit-sharing approach," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 271-283, January.
    16. Rupesh Kumar Pati, 2014. "Modelling Bullwhip Effect in a Closed Loop Supply Chain with ARMA Demand," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 3(2), pages 149-164, July.
    17. Wang, Xun & Disney, Stephen M., 2016. "The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 691-701.
    18. Dass, Mayukh & Reshadi, Mehrnoosh & Li, Yuewu, 2023. "An exploration of ripple effects of advertising among major suppliers in a supply chain network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Sridhar R. Tayur, 2003. "Models for Supply Chains in E-Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1387-1406, October.
    20. Pastore, Erica & Alfieri, Arianna & Zotteri, Giulio & Boylan, John E., 2020. "The impact of demand parameter uncertainty on the bullwhip effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 94-107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:199:y:2009:i:1:p:130-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.