IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v113y1999i2p261-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A DSS for multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecisely specified trade-offs

Author

Listed:
  • Podinovski, Victor V.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Podinovski, Victor V., 1999. "A DSS for multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecisely specified trade-offs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 261-270, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:113:y:1999:i:2:p:261-270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(98)00215-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Korhonen, Pekka & Moskowitz, Herbert & Wallenius, Jyrki, 1992. "Multiple criteria decision support - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 361-375, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S H Choi & B S Ahn, 2009. "IP-MAGS: an incomplete preference-based multiple attribute group support system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(4), pages 496-505, April.
    2. Maciej Nowak & Tadeusz Trzaskalik, 2022. "A trade-off multiobjective dynamic programming procedure and its application to project portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 1155-1181, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalaba, Robert & Tesfatsion, Leigh, 1996. "A multicriteria approach to model specification and estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 193-214, February.
    2. Kurka, Thomas & Blackwood, David, 2013. "Selection of MCA methods to support decision making for renewable energy developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 225-233.
    3. Chowdary, Boppana V. & Slomp, Jannes, 2002. "Production planning under dynamic product environment: a multi-objective goal programming approach," Research Report 02A12, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    4. J. Granat & M. Makowski, 1998. "ISAAP - Interactive Specification and Analysis of Aspiration-Based Preferences," Working Papers ir98052, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    5. Downing, C. E. & Ringuest, J. L., 1998. "An experimental evaluation of the efficacy of four multi-objective linear programming algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 549-558, February.
    6. Haapalinna, Ilkka, 2003. "How to allocate funds within the army," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 224-233, January.
    7. Korhonen, Pekka J. & Silvennoinen, Kari & Wallenius, Jyrki & Öörni, Anssi, 2012. "Can a linear value function explain choices? An experimental study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 360-367.
    8. Kasanen, Eero & Wallenius, Hannele & Wallenius, Jyrki & Zionts, Stanley, 2000. "A study of high-level managerial decision processes, with implications for MCDM research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 496-510, February.
    9. Feng Dong & Xinqi Gao & Jingyun Li & Yuanqing Zhang & Yajie Liu, 2018. "Drivers of China’s Industrial Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Joint PDA and LMDI Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Giovanni Circella, 2006. "Towards the adoption of technological innovations: decision processes in transport policy definition," ERSA conference papers ersa06p556, European Regional Science Association.
    11. M. Makowski, 1994. "Methodology and a Modular Tool for Multiple Criteria Analysis of LP Models," Working Papers wp94102, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    12. Kumar, Abhishek & Sah, Bikash & Singh, Arvind R. & Deng, Yan & He, Xiangning & Kumar, Praveen & Bansal, R.C., 2017. "A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 596-609.
    13. Vetschera, Rudolf, 1991. "A preference-preserving projection technique for MCDM," Discussion Papers, Series I 256, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    14. Salo, Ahti A., 1995. "Interactive decision aiding for group decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 134-149, July.
    15. repec:dgr:rugsom:02a12 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Antonio Morillas & Bárbara Díaz & Jesús González, 2005. "FUZZY COMPARATIVE CONCORDANCE ANALYSIS. Proposal and evaluation by a case study," Urban/Regional 0512004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Sayin, Serpil & Karabati, Selcuk, 1999. "A bicriteria approach to the two-machine flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 435-449, March.
    18. Rok Drnovšek & Marija Milavec Kapun & Uroš Rajkovič, 2021. "Multi-criteria risk evaluation model for developing ventilator-associated pneumonia," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(3), pages 1021-1036, September.
    19. Nicholas Generous & Kristen J Margevicius & Kirsten J Taylor-McCabe & Mac Brown & W Brent Daniel & Lauren Castro & Andrea Hengartner & Alina Deshpande, 2014. "Selecting Essential Information for Biosurveillance—A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Gandibleux, Xavier, 1999. "Interactive multicriteria procedure exploiting a knowledge-based module to select electricity production alternatives: The CASTART system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 355-373, March.
    21. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2944 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Peter Bogetoft & Kurt Nielsen, 2005. "Internet Based Benchmarking," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 195-215, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:113:y:1999:i:2:p:261-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.