IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v112y1999i3p554-569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal warranties, reliabilities and prices for durable goods in an oligopoly

Author

Listed:
  • DeCroix, Gregory A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • DeCroix, Gregory A., 1999. "Optimal warranties, reliabilities and prices for durable goods in an oligopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 554-569, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:112:y:1999:i:3:p:554-569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(97)00418-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Padmanabhan & Ram C. Rao, 1993. "Warranty Policy and Extended Service Contracts: Theory and an Application to Automobiles," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 230-247.
    2. Wiener, Joshua Lyle, 1985. "Are Warranties Accurate Signals of Product Reliability?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(2), pages 245-250, September.
    3. Vives, Xavier, 1990. "Nash equilibrium with strategic complementarities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 305-321.
    4. Theodore S. Glickman & Paul D. Berger, 1976. "Optimal Price and Protection Period Decisions for a Product Under Warranty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(12), pages 1381-1390, August.
    5. Milgrom, Paul & Roberts, John, 1990. "Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 58(6), pages 1255-1277, November.
    6. Donald M. Topkis, 1978. "Minimizing a Submodular Function on a Lattice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 305-321, April.
    7. Courville, Leon & Hausman, Warren H, 1979. "Warranty Scope and Reliability under Imperfect Information and Alternative Market Structures," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 52(3), pages 361-378, July.
    8. Frederick L. Hulting & Jeffrey A. Robinson, 1994. "The reliability of a series system of repairable subsystems: A bayesian approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 483-506, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui-Chih Hung & Chung-Yu Chung & Muh-Cherng Wu & Wan-Ling Shen, 2017. "A membership pricing policy to facilitate service scale-expansion," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3-4), pages 167-189, March.
    2. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Hadadpour, Shirin & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo & Shaikh, Ali Akbar, 2017. "Warranty and price optimization in a competitive duopoly supply chain with parallel importation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 76-88.
    3. Wei Xie, 2017. "Optimal pricing and two-dimensional warranty policies for a new product," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6857-6870, November.
    4. Darghouth, M.N. & Ait-kadi, D. & Chelbi, A., 2017. "Joint optimization of design, warranty and price for products sold with maintenance service contracts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 197-208.
    5. Murthy, D.N.P. & Hagmark, P.-E. & Virtanen, S., 2009. "Product variety and reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1601-1608.
    6. Lei, Yong & Liu, Qian & Shum, Stephen, 2017. "Warranty pricing with consumer learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 596-610.
    7. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Jiao, Can & Yuan, Tao, 2019. "Optimal decisions on product reliability, sales and promotion under nonrenewable warranties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Murthy, D. N. P. & Djamaludin, I., 2002. "New product warranty: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 231-260, October.
    9. Prashant M. Ambad & Makarand S. Kulkarni, 2017. "A goal programming approach for multi-objective warranty optimization," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(4), pages 842-861, December.
    10. Haruvy, Ernan E. & Li, Tao & Sethi, Suresh P., 2012. "Two-stage pricing for custom-made products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 405-414.
    11. Chen Jin & Luyi Yang & Cungen Zhu, 2023. "Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1017-1036, February.
    12. Tanmay Sen & Ritwik Bhattacharya & Biswabrata Pradhan & Yogesh Mani Tripathi, 2020. "Determination of Bayesian optimal warranty length under Type-II unified hybrid censoring scheme," Papers 2004.08533, arXiv.org.
    13. Noll, Juergen, 2004. "Comparing quality signals as tools of consumer protection: are warranties always better than advertisements to promote higher product quality?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 227-239, June.
    14. Zhou, Zhefang & Li, Yanjun & Tang, Kwei, 2009. "Dynamic pricing and warranty policies for products with fixed lifetime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 940-948, August.
    15. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Santana, João Mateus & Droguett, Enrique López & Lins, Isis Didier & Guedes, Bruno Nunes, 2017. "Analysis of extended warranties for medical equipment: A Stackelberg game model using priority queues," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 338-354.
    16. Kim, Bowon & Park, Sangsun, 2008. "Optimal pricing, EOL (end of life) warranty, and spare parts manufacturing strategy amid product transition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(3), pages 723-745, August.
    17. Kanatlı, Mehmet Ali & Karaer, Özgen, 2022. "Servitization as an alternative business model and its implications on product durability, profitability & environmental impact," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 546-560.
    18. Kirkizoğlu, Zeynep & Karaer, Özgen, 2022. "After-sales service and warranty decisions of a durable goods manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    19. Arda Yenipazarli, 2015. "A road map to new product success: warranty, advertisement and price," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 669-694, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marlin U. Thomas & Sridevi S. Rao, 1999. "Warranty Economic Decision Models: A Summary and Some Suggested Directions for Future Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 807-820, December.
    2. Amir, Rabah & Bloch, Francis, 2009. "Comparative statics in a simple class of strategic market games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 7-24, January.
    3. Gama, Adriana & Rietzke, David, 2019. "Monotone comparative statics in games with non-monotonic best-replies: Contests and Cournot oligopoly," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 823-841.
    4. Amir, Rabah & Wooders, John, 2000. "One-Way Spillovers, Endogenous Innovator/Imitator Roles, and Research Joint Ventures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Kockesen, Levent & Ok, Efe A. & Sethi, Rajiv, 2000. "The Strategic Advantage of Negatively Interdependent Preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 274-299, June.
    6. Amir, Rabah & Lazzati, Natalia, 2011. "Network effects, market structure and industry performance," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(6), pages 2389-2419.
    7. Ceparano, Maria Carmela & Quartieri, Federico, 2017. "Nash equilibrium uniqueness in nice games with isotone best replies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 154-165.
    8. Roy, Sunanda & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2010. "Monotone comparative statics for games with strategic substitutes," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 793-806, September.
    9. Amir, Rabah & De Castro, Luciano, 2017. "Nash equilibrium in games with quasi-monotonic best-responses," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 220-246.
    10. Tesoriere, Antonio, 2017. "Stackelberg equilibrium with multiple firms and setup costs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 86-102.
    11. Shirai, Koji, 2010. "An existence theorem for Cournot-Walras equilibria in a monopolistically competitive economy," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1093-1102, November.
    12. Carlier, G. & Dana, R.-A., 2005. "Rearrangement inequalities in non-convex insurance models," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(4-5), pages 483-503, August.
    13. Roy, Sunanda & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2012. "Characterizing stability properties in games with strategic substitutes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 337-353.
    14. Koch, Caleb M., 2019. "Index-wise comparative statics," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 35-41.
    15. Chambers, Christopher P. & Echenique, Federico, 2009. "Supermodularity and preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 1004-1014, May.
    16. Acemoglu, Daron & Jensen, Martin Kaae, 2013. "Aggregate comparative statics," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 27-49.
    17. Balbus, Łukasz & Reffett, Kevin & Woźny, Łukasz, 2014. "A constructive study of Markov equilibria in stochastic games with strategic complementarities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 815-840.
    18. Echenique, Federico, 2004. "A weak correspondence principle for models with complementarities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-2), pages 145-152, February.
    19. Jia, Hao, 2020. "The even split rule for (concave) symmetric supermodular functions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    20. Amir, Rabah, 1996. "Sensitivity analysis of multisector optimal economic dynamics," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 123-141.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:112:y:1999:i:3:p:554-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.