IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v30y2018ipbp220-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatially explicit life cycle impact assessment for soil erosion from global crop production

Author

Listed:
  • van Zelm, Rosalie
  • van der Velde, Marijn
  • Balkovic, Juraj
  • Čengić, Mirza
  • Elshout, Pieter M.F.
  • Koellner, Thomas
  • Núñez, Montserrat
  • Obersteiner, Michael
  • Schmid, Erwin
  • Huijbregts, Mark A.J.

Abstract

We derived spatially explicit erosion rates in kg of soil lost per kg of crop asa function of crop choice and management practice on a global scale. These so-called characterization factors (CFs) can be used in product life cycle assessment studies to determine the impact of crop cultivation on soil erosion. We used the biophysical crop model EPIC to determine yields and erosion rates for cassava, corn, rapeseed, soybean, sugarcane, sunflower, and wheat under subsistence, rainfed with fertilizer, and high input (irrigation and fertilizer) farming. Yields varied considerably and contributed to variation in CFs to the same extent as erosion rates. Variation in CFs was mainly attributable to geographic location. Crop type and management scenario still lead to variation in CFs of 2 orders of magnitude, and a factor of 6, respectively. Lowest CFs were predicted for sugarcane worldwide, while largest impacts were seen for rapeseed. Largest median CFs were predicted for subsistence farming, while smallest CFs were obtained for high input systems. Median estimated damage in 2014 erosion costs ranged from 0.5$/t sugarcane to 526$/t rapeseed. Farmers can minimize erosion by carefully selecting management strategies, while purchasers can carefully select source locations to help reduce erosion related environmental damage.

Suggested Citation

  • van Zelm, Rosalie & van der Velde, Marijn & Balkovic, Juraj & Čengić, Mirza & Elshout, Pieter M.F. & Koellner, Thomas & Núñez, Montserrat & Obersteiner, Michael & Schmid, Erwin & Huijbregts, Mark A.J., 2018. "Spatially explicit life cycle impact assessment for soil erosion from global crop production," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PB), pages 220-227.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:30:y:2018:i:pb:p:220-227
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617304965
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bing Liu & Senthold Asseng & Christoph Müller & Frank Ewert & Joshua Elliott & David B. Lobell & Pierre Martre & Alex C. Ruane & Daniel Wallach & James W. Jones & Cynthia Rosenzweig & Pramod K. Aggarw, 2016. "Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1130-1136, December.
    2. Christian Folberth & Rastislav Skalský & Elena Moltchanova & Juraj Balkovič & Ligia B. Azevedo & Michael Obersteiner & Marijn van der Velde, 2016. "Uncertainty in soil data can outweigh climate impact signals in global crop yield simulations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, September.
    3. de Groot, Rudolf & Brander, Luke & van der Ploeg, Sander & Costanza, Robert & Bernard, Florence & Braat, Leon & Christie, Mike & Crossman, Neville & Ghermandi, Andrea & Hein, Lars & Hussain, Salman & , 2012. "Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 50-61.
    4. Balkovič, Juraj & van der Velde, Marijn & Schmid, Erwin & Skalský, Rastislav & Khabarov, Nikolay & Obersteiner, Michael & Stürmer, Bernhard & Xiong, Wei, 2013. "Pan-European crop modelling with EPIC: Implementation, up-scaling and regional crop yield validation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 61-75.
    5. Cabelguenne, M. & Jones, C. A. & Marty, J. R. & Dyke, P. T. & Williams, J. R., 1990. "Calibration and validation of EPIC for crop rotations in southern France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 153-171.
    6. T.A.M. Pugh & C. Müller & J. Elliott & D. Deryng & C. Folberth & S. Olin & E. Schmid & A. Arneth, 2016. "Climate analogues suggest limited potential for intensification of production on current croplands under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, November.
    7. Billen, Norbert & Röder, Clara & Gaiser, Thomas & Stahr, Karl, 2009. "Carbon sequestration in soils of SW-Germany as affected by agricultural management—Calibration of the EPIC model for regional simulations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 71-80.
    8. P. M. F. Elshout & R. van Zelm & J. Balkovic & M. Obersteiner & E. Schmid & R. Skalsky & M. van der Velde & M. A. J. Huijbregts, 2015. "Greenhouse-gas payback times for crop-based biofuels," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 604-610, June.
    9. Bernhard Schauberger & Sotirios Archontoulis & Almut Arneth & Juraj Balkovic & Philippe Ciais & Delphine Deryng & Joshua Elliott & Christian Folberth & Nikolay Khabarov & Christoph Müller & Thomas A. , 2017. "Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, April.
    10. Zhengang Wang & Thomas Hoffmann & Johan Six & Jed O. Kaplan & Gerard Govers & Sebastian Doetterl & Kristof Van Oost, 2017. "Human-induced erosion has offset one-third of carbon emissions from land cover change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 345-349, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Noreika & Tailin Li & David Zumr & Josef Krasa & Tomas Dostal & Raghavan Srinivasan, 2020. "Farm-Scale Biofuel Crop Adoption and Its Effects on In-Basin Water Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Claudia Parra Paitan & Peter H. Verburg, 2019. "Methods to Assess the Impacts and Indirect Land Use Change Caused by Telecoupled Agricultural Supply Chains: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Lin Chu & Tiancheng Sun & Tianwei Wang & Zhaoxia Li & Chongfa Cai, 2020. "Temporal and Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Erosion and a Quantitative Analysis of its Determinants in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bao, Yawen & Hoogenboom, Gerrit & McClendon, Ron & Vellidis, George, 2017. "A comparison of the performance of the CSM-CERES-Maize and EPIC models using maize variety trial data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 109-119.
    2. Xiong, Wei & Balkovič, Juraj & van der Velde, Marijn & Zhang, Xuesong & Izaurralde, R. César & Skalský, Rastislav & Lin, Erda & Mueller, Nathan & Obersteiner, Michael, 2014. "A calibration procedure to improve global rice yield simulations with EPIC," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 128-139.
    3. Wang, Zhiqiang & Ye, Li & Jiang, Jingyi & Fan, Yida & Zhang, Xiaoran, 2022. "Review of application of EPIC crop growth model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    4. Balkovič, Juraj & van der Velde, Marijn & Schmid, Erwin & Skalský, Rastislav & Khabarov, Nikolay & Obersteiner, Michael & Stürmer, Bernhard & Xiong, Wei, 2013. "Pan-European crop modelling with EPIC: Implementation, up-scaling and regional crop yield validation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 61-75.
    5. Wang, Zhaozhi & Zhang, T.Q. & Tan, C.S. & Xue, Lulin & Bukovsky, Melissa & Qi, Z.M., 2021. "Modeling impacts of climate change on crop yield and phosphorus loss in a subsurface drained field of Lake Erie region, Canada," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Le, Kieu N. & Jeong, Jaehak & Reyes, Manuel R. & Jha, Manoj K. & Gassman, Philip W. & Doro, Luca & Hok, Lyda & Boulakia, Stéphane, 2018. "Evaluation of the performance of the EPIC model for yield and biomass simulation under conservation systems in Cambodia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 90-100.
    7. Dono, Gabriele & Cortignani, Raffaele & Dell'Unto, Davide & Deligios, Paola & Doro, Luca & Lacetera, Nicola & Mula, Laura & Pasqui, Massimiliano & Quaresima, Sara & Vitali, Andrea & Roggero, Pier Paol, 2016. "Winners and losers from climate change in agriculture: Insights from a case study in the Mediterranean basin," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 65-75.
    8. He, Liuyue & Xue, Jingyuan & Wang, Sufen, 2023. "WHCrop: A novel water-heat driven crop model for estimating the spatiotemporal dynamics of crop growth for arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    9. van der Velde, M. & Nisini, L., 2019. "Performance of the MARS-crop yield forecasting system for the European Union: Assessing accuracy, in-season, and year-to-year improvements from 1993 to 2015," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 203-212.
    10. Guo, Shibo & Zhang, Zhentao & Guo, Erjing & Fu, Zhenzhen & Gong, Jingjin & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2022. "Historical and projected impacts of climate change and technology on soybean yield in China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler & Juraj Balkovič & Kadri Silm & Anna Timonina-Farkas, 2019. "Large scale extreme risk assessment using copulas: an application to drought events under climate change for Austria," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 651-669, October.
    12. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.
    13. Qu, Yang & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Huang, Junling & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Development of a computable general equilibrium model based on integrated macroeconomic framework for ocean multi-use between offshore wind farms and fishing activities in Scotland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    14. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    15. Pan, Ying & Wu, Junxi & Zhang, Yanjie & Zhang, Xianzhou & Yu, Chengqun, 2021. "Simultaneous enhancement of ecosystem services and poverty reduction through adjustments to subsidy policies relating to grassland use in Tibet, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    16. Jeetendra Prakash Aryal & Tek B. Sapkota & Ritika Khurana & Arun Khatri-Chhetri & Dil Bahadur Rahut & M. L. Jat, 2020. "Climate change and agriculture in South Asia: adaptation options in smallholder production systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5045-5075, August.
    17. Hackbart, Vivian C.S. & de Lima, Guilherme T.N.P. & dos Santos, Rozely F., 2017. "Theory and practice of water ecosystem services valuation: Where are we going?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 218-227.
    18. Nibedita Mukherjee & Jean Huge & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam, 2014. "Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/217963, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    19. Jean-Marc Boussard & Jean-Philippe Boussemart & Guillermo Flichman & Florence Jacquet & Henri-Bertrand Lefer, 1997. "The effects of the CAP reform on French crop-livestock farms. Technical changes and regional specialisation [Les effets de la réforme de la PAC sur les exploitations de grande culture]," Post-Print hal-02694550, HAL.
    20. Rodríguez-Ortega, T. & Olaizola, A.M. & Bernués, A., 2018. "A novel management-based system of payments for ecosystem services for targeted agri-environmental policy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 74-84.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:30:y:2018:i:pb:p:220-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.