IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v484y2023ics0304380023002016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new interval meta-goal programming for sustainable planning of agricultural water-land use nexus

Author

Listed:
  • Mardani Najafabadi, Mostafa
  • Magazzino, Cosimo
  • Valente, Donatella
  • Mirzaei, Abbas
  • Petrosillo, Irene

Abstract

Meta-Goal Programming (MGP) is a simultaneous cognitive evaluation of the degree of achievements for original decision goals considered in a GP model. However, in most real-world situations, environmental coefficients and related parameters are not easily available. In such a situation, the decision-maker must consider various conflicting targets in a framework of uncertain aspiration levels at the same time. On the other side, Interval Programming (IP) is a method used to increase the range of available decision-maker preference structures in GP. In the perspective of solving the conflicts between agriculture and water use towards sustainability, this paper proposes an Interval Meta-Goal Programming Model (IMGPM) dealing with imprecision in data that covers interval coefficients, target intervals, and interval bounds of meta-goals. This novel methodology has been tested in a study area in Iran to validate its added value in solving conflicting uses of natural resources by economic sectors. This integration together with its application for sustainable optimal cropping patterns (agroecosystem planning) represents a novelty in the field of ecological modeling. The management solutions of our method in terms of land allocation are different from those in Sen and Pal (2013) model. In the case of Iran, many socio-ecological-economic strategies and policies should be necessary for improving the agricultural sector. More specifically, on the basis of rainfall amounts and spatial patterns, this approach can represent a decision-support system able to define strategies for additional water storage useful to support crop production. Furthermore, the availability of water together with the sustainable use of fertilizers can mitigate the risk of land degradation, guaranteeing people employment, food security, and economic profits. Although the present methodology seems to solve the problem of multi-goals decision-making, the inclusion of spatial relationships is able to introduce dependencies between the management of land use in adjacent areas, making the present approach nearer to real-world functioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Mardani Najafabadi, Mostafa & Magazzino, Cosimo & Valente, Donatella & Mirzaei, Abbas & Petrosillo, Irene, 2023. "A new interval meta-goal programming for sustainable planning of agricultural water-land use nexus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:484:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023002016
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023002016
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puustinen, Tuulia & Krigsholm, Pauliina & Falkenbach, Heidi, 2022. "Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: A literature-based approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Karrou, M. & Oweis, T., 2012. "Water and land productivities of wheat and food legumes with deficit supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 94-103.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    4. Seyed Taha Loghmani Khouzani & Sabrina Kirschke & Ali Yousefi & Rudolf Liedl, 2022. "The effect of policy incoherence on the emergence of groundwater-related subsidence phenomena: a case study from Iran," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 181-204, February.
    5. Chopra, Ritika & Magazzino, Cosimo & Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Rao, Amar & Shahzad, Umer, 2022. "The role of renewable energy and natural resources for sustainable agriculture in ASEAN countries: Do carbon emissions and deforestation affect agriculture productivity?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Donatella Valente & Erica Maria Lovello & Cosimo Gaspare Giannuzzi & Angela Maria Scardia Scardia & Maria Victoria Marinelli & Irene Petrosillo, 2023. "Towards Land Consumption Neutrality and Natural Capital Enhancement at Urban Landscape Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Abbas Mirzaei & Mansour Zibaei, 2021. "Water Conflict Management between Agriculture and Wetland under Climate Change: Application of Economic-Hydrological-Behavioral Modelling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Divinsky, Itai & Becker, Nir & Bar (Kutiel), Pua, 2017. "Ecosystem service tradeoff between grazing intensity and other services - A case study in Karei-Deshe experimental cattle range in northern Israel," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 16-27.
    9. Rodriguez Uria, M. Victoria & Caballero, Rafael & Ruiz, Francisco & Romero, Carlos, 2002. "Meta-goal programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 422-429, January.
    10. Gordon, Line J. & Finlayson, C. Max & Falkenmark, Malin, 2010. "Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 512-519, April.
    11. Dongwen Tian & Na Hu & Xin Wang & Li Huang & Xian Xin & Laping Wu, 2016. "Trade margins, quality upgrading, and China’s agri-food export growth," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 1-1, March.
    12. Velandia, Margarita & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Knight, Thomas O. & Sherrick, Bruce J., 2009. "Factors Affecting Farmers' Utilization of Agricultural Risk Management Tools: The Case of Crop Insurance, Forward Contracting, and Spreading Sales," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 107-123, April.
    13. Maes, Joachim & Egoh, Benis & Willemen, Louise & Liquete, Camino & Vihervaara, Petteri & Schägner, Jan Philipp & Grizzetti, Bruna & Drakou, Evangelia G. & Notte, Alessandra La & Zulian, Grazia & Boura, 2012. "Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 31-39.
    14. Brinegar, Hilary R. & Ward, Frank A., 2009. "Basin impacts of irrigation water conservation policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 414-426, December.
    15. B Vitoriano & C Romero, 1999. "Extended interval goal programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(12), pages 1280-1283, December.
    16. Jain, Sonal & Ramesh, Dharavath & Trivedi, Munesh C. & Edla, Damodar Reddy, 2023. "Evaluation of metaheuristic optimization algorithms for optimal allocation of surface water and groundwater resources for crop production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    17. Kaveh Madani, 2014. "Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis?," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 4(4), pages 315-328, December.
    18. Pilehforooshha, Parastoo & Karimi, Mohammad & Taleai, Mohammad, 2014. "A GIS-based agricultural land-use allocation model coupling increase and decrease in land demand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 116-125.
    19. Nikouei, Alireza & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Marzban, Zahra, 2022. "Modeling land allocation to produce crops under economic and environmental goals in Iran: a multi-objective programming approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    20. Mardani Najafabadi, Mostafa & Ziaee, Saman & Nikouei, Alireza & Ahmadpour Borazjani, Mahmoud, 2019. "Mathematical programming model (MMP) for optimization of regional cropping patterns decisions: A case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 218-232.
    21. Popp, J. & Lakner, Z. & Harangi-Rákos, M. & Fári, M., 2014. "The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 559-578.
    22. Caballero, Rafael & Ruiz, Francisco & Uria, M. Victoria Rodriguez & Romero, Carlos, 2006. "Interactive meta-goal programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 135-154, November.
    23. Chang, Ching-Ter & Lin, Teng-Chiao, 2009. "Interval goal programming for S-shaped penalty function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 9-20, November.
    24. Hanks, Robert W. & Weir, Jeffery D. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 636-646.
    25. Norman Siebrecht, 2020. "Sustainable Agriculture and Its Implementation Gap—Overcoming Obstacles to Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, May.
    26. Zhang, Chenglong & Yang, Gaiqiang & Wang, Chaozi & Huo, Zailin, 2023. "Linking agricultural water-food-environment nexus with crop area planning: A fuzzy credibility-based multi-objective linear fractional programming approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    27. Nazari, Bijan & Liaghat, Abdolmajid & Akbari, Mohammad Reza & Keshavarz, Marzieh, 2018. "Irrigation water management in Iran: Implications for water use efficiency improvement," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 7-18.
    28. Li, Mo & Fu, Qiang & Singh, Vijay P. & Liu, Dong, 2018. "An interval multi-objective programming model for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-36.
    29. Ching-Ter Chang, 2006. "Mixed binary interval goal programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(4), pages 469-473, April.
    30. Romero, Carlos, 2004. "A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(3), pages 675-686, March.
    31. Ghahtarani, Alireza & Najafi, Amir Abbas, 2013. "Robust goal programming for multi-objective portfolio selection problem," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 588-592.
    32. Mostafa Mardani Najafabadi & Abbas Mirzaei & Hassan Azarm & Siamak Nikmehr, 2022. "Managing Water Supply and Demand to Achieve Economic and Environmental Objectives: Application of Mathematical Programming and ANFIS Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 3007-3027, July.
    33. Dongwen Tian & Na Hu & Xin Wang & Li Huang, 2016. "Trade margins, quality upgrading, and China’s agri-food export growth," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 277-298, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pakrooh, Parisa & Kamal, Muhamad Abdul, 2023. "Modeling the potential impacts of climate change on wheat yield in Iran: Evidence from national and provincial data analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2011. "Multi-choice goal programming with utility functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 439-445, December.
    2. Hocine, Amine, 2018. "Meta goal programing approach for solving multi-criteria de Novo programing problemAuthor-Name: Zhuang, Zheng-Yun," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 228-238.
    3. Mostafa Mardani Najafabadi & Abbas Mirzaei & Hassan Azarm & Siamak Nikmehr, 2022. "Managing Water Supply and Demand to Achieve Economic and Environmental Objectives: Application of Mathematical Programming and ANFIS Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 3007-3027, July.
    4. Tom Rihm & Philipp Baumann, 2018. "Staff assignment with lexicographically ordered acceptance levels," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 167-189, April.
    5. Hanks, Robert W. & Lunday, Brian J. & Weir, Jeffery D., 2020. "Robust goal programming for multi-objective optimization of data-driven problems: A use case for the United States transportation command's liner rate setting problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee & Zahra Dashtian & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber & Hana Tomaskova & Mehdi Soltani & Nasim Sadat Mousavi, 2021. "An Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Green Supplier Selection in an Agri-Food Supply Chain: Threshold of Robustness Worthiness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-30, June.
    7. Hocine, Amin & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Lozza, Sergio Ortobelli & Aouam, Tarik, 2024. "Modelling De novo programming within Simon’s satisficing theory: Methods and application in designing an optimal offshore wind farm location system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 289-306.
    8. Chang, Ching-Ter & Lin, Teng-Chiao, 2009. "Interval goal programming for S-shaped penalty function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 9-20, November.
    9. Hanks, Robert W. & Weir, Jeffery D. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 636-646.
    10. Jones, Dylan & Jimenez, Mariano, 2013. "Incorporating additional meta-objectives into the extended lexicographic goal programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 343-349.
    11. Mila Bravo & Dylan Jones & David Pla-Santamaria & Francisco Salas-Molina, 2022. "Encompassing statistically unquantifiable randomness in goal programming: an application to portfolio selection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5685-5706, November.
    12. Zgajnar, Jaka & Kavcic, Stane, 2011. "Weighted Goal Programming and Penalty Functions: Whole-farm Planning Approach Under Risk," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 118033, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Pereira, Luis S. & Bybordi, Mohammad, 2023. "Water management dilemma in the agricultural sector of Iran: A review focusing on water governance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    14. Rouzaneh, Davoud & Yazdanpanah, Masoud & Jahromi, Arman Bakhshi, 2021. "Evaluating micro-irrigation system performance through assessment of farmers' satisfaction: implications for adoption, longevity, and water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    15. Karimi, Azadeh & Yazdandad, Hossein & Fagerholm, Nora, 2020. "Evaluating social perceptions of ecosystem services, biodiversity, and land management: Trade-offs, synergies and implications for landscape planning and management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    16. González-Pachón, Jacinto & Romero, Carlos, 2016. "Bentham, Marx and Rawls ethical principles: In search for a compromise," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 47-51.
    17. Benítez-Fernández, Amalia & Ruiz, Francisco, 2020. "A Meta-Goal Programming approach to cardinal preferences aggregation in multicriteria problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Peiyu Zhang & Yankui Liu & Guoqing Yang & Guoqing Zhang, 2022. "A multi-objective distributionally robust model for sustainable last mile relief network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 689-730, February.
    19. Huihui Zheng & Zhiting Sang & Kaige Wang & Yan Xu & Zhaoyang Cai, 2022. "Distribution of Irrigated and Rainfed Agricultural Land in a Semi-Arid Sandy Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, September.
    20. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2007. "Multi-choice goal programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 389-396, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:484:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023002016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.