IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v484y2023ics0304380023001801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting dynamic trajectories of a protected plant community under contrasting conservation regimes: Insights from data-based modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Acosta-Arreola, Jaime
  • Domínguez-Hüttinger, Elisa
  • Aguirre, Pablo
  • González, Nicolás
  • Meave, Jorge A.

Abstract

Data-based modelling of the dynamic behaviour of ecological communities is a big challenge in systems ecology and conservation biology. Implementing such models to forecast future scenarios is key for supporting decision-making in ecological reserves, given the multiple disturbances threatening their future. Using demographic and dynamic data for three tree (or tree-like) species from the Pedregal de San Ángel Ecological Reserve (Mexico City, Mexico), we constructed a family of dynamical models (using systems of ordinary differential equations) to reconstruct their dynamic interactions. The first two models considered two native species (Pittocaulon praecox and Buddleja cordata), with either antagonistic or cooperative interactions between them. These species have been considered ecosystem engineers playing different roles in the system and determining several community attributes. These models predict the transition from a stable steady state dominated by P. praecox (as reported in the 1950s) to the current community whose structure is apparently shifting to an alternative stable state dominated by B. cordata. The second pair of models additionally incorporate the invasive tree Eucalyptus camaldulensis, which exerts negative effects on all native plant species. The prediction of these models is an E. camaldulensis-dominated state with the exclusion of the native species from the reserve, provided this invasive species follows current population growth trends, without external intervention to check this process. Bifurcation analysis of this latter model allowed us to rationally design optimal intervention strategies that could potentially divert the trajectory from converging to an E. camaldulensis-only configuration into the stable coexistence of the native species. For the two-species and three-species models we made two versions, one with only competitive interactions and another one including a facilitation interaction between B. cordata and P. praecox. This analysis shows that facilitation is a requirement to achieve stable coexistence between the two native species, even in the presence of E. camaldulensis. The models constructed here, which integrate multiple data sources, help clarify conflicting empirical information regarding potential ecological mechanisms, and allow making predictions for strengthening the future management and E. camaldulensis control programs before its effects irreversibly modify the functioning and biodiversity of the biotic community protected in the reserve.

Suggested Citation

  • Acosta-Arreola, Jaime & Domínguez-Hüttinger, Elisa & Aguirre, Pablo & González, Nicolás & Meave, Jorge A., 2023. "Predicting dynamic trajectories of a protected plant community under contrasting conservation regimes: Insights from data-based modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:484:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023001801
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023001801
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oscar Venter & Eric W. Sanderson & Ainhoa Magrach & James R. Allan & Jutta Beher & Kendall R. Jones & Hugh P. Possingham & William F. Laurance & Peter Wood & Balázs M. Fekete & Marc A. Levy & James E., 2016. "Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Nawal Shrestha & Xiaoting Xu & Jiahui Meng & Zhiheng Wang, 2021. "Vulnerabilities of protected lands in the face of climate and human footprint changes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Marten Scheffer & Steve Carpenter & Jonathan A. Foley & Carl Folke & Brian Walker, 2001. "Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems," Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6856), pages 591-596, October.
    4. Nawal Shrestha & Xiaoting Xu & Jiahui Meng & Zhiheng Wang, 2021. "Author Correction: Vulnerabilities of protected lands in the face of climate and human footprint changes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1, December.
    5. Mohd, Mohd Hafiz, 2019. "Diversity in interaction strength promotes rich dynamical behaviours in a three-species ecological system," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 353(C), pages 243-253.
    6. Sonia Kéfi & Vishwesha Guttal & William A Brock & Stephen R Carpenter & Aaron M Ellison & Valerie N Livina & David A Seekell & Marten Scheffer & Egbert H van Nes & Vasilis Dakos, 2014. "Early Warning Signals of Ecological Transitions: Methods for Spatial Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Schuwirth, Nele & Borgwardt, Florian & Domisch, Sami & Friedrichs, Martin & Kattwinkel, Mira & Kneis, David & Kuemmerlen, Mathias & Langhans, Simone D. & Martínez-López, Javier & Vermeiren, Peter, 2019. "How to make ecological models useful for environmental management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    8. Marten Scheffer & Jordi Bascompte & William A. Brock & Victor Brovkin & Stephen R. Carpenter & Vasilis Dakos & Hermann Held & Egbert H. van Nes & Max Rietkerk & George Sugihara, 2009. "Early-warning signals for critical transitions," Nature, Nature, vol. 461(7260), pages 53-59, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bian, Junhao & Ma, Zhiqin & Wang, Chunping & Huang, Tao & Zeng, Chunhua, 2024. "Early warning for spatial ecological system: Fractal dimension and deep learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 633(C).
    2. Vishwesha Guttal & Srinivas Raghavendra & Nikunj Goel & Quentin Hoarau, 2016. "Lack of Critical Slowing Down Suggests that Financial Meltdowns Are Not Critical Transitions, yet Rising Variability Could Signal Systemic Risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Vasilis Dakos & Stephen R Carpenter & William A Brock & Aaron M Ellison & Vishwesha Guttal & Anthony R Ives & Sonia Kéfi & Valerie Livina & David A Seekell & Egbert H van Nes & Marten Scheffer, 2012. "Methods for Detecting Early Warnings of Critical Transitions in Time Series Illustrated Using Simulated Ecological Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Zeng, Chunhua & Wang, Hua, 2012. "Noise and large time delay: Accelerated catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 233(C), pages 52-58.
    5. Florian Wagener, 2013. "Shallow lake economics run deep: nonlinear aspects of an economic-ecological interest conflict," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 423-450, December.
    6. Kevin Thellmann & Marc Cotter & Sabine Baumgartner & Anna Treydte & Georg Cadisch & Folkard Asch, 2018. "Tipping Points in the Supply of Ecosystem Services of a Mountainous Watershed in Southeast Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Ren, Bijie & Polasky, Stephen, 2014. "The optimal management of renewable resources under the risk of potential regime shift," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 195-212.
    8. Dmitry Gromov & Thorsten Upmann, 2021. "Dynamics and Economics of Shallow Lakes: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Crépin, Anne-Sophie & Biggs, Reinette & Polasky, Stephen & Troell, Max & de Zeeuw, Aart, 2012. "Regime shifts and management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 15-22.
    10. William A Brock & Stephen R Carpenter, 2012. "Early Warnings of Regime Shift When the Ecosystem Structure Is Unknown," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-10, September.
    11. Tatiana Baumuratova & Simona Dobre & Thierry Bastogne & Thomas Sauter, 2013. "Switch of Sensitivity Dynamics Revealed with DyGloSA Toolbox for Dynamical Global Sensitivity Analysis as an Early Warning for System's Critical Transition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Zejie Zhou & Boleslaw K Szymanski & Jianxi Gao, 2020. "Modeling competitive evolution of multiple languages," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Dang, Yuxuan & Zhao, Zhenting & Kong, Xiangbin & Lei, Ming & Liao, Yubo & Xie, Zhen & Song, Wei, 2023. "Discerning the process of cultivated land governance transition in China since the reform and opening-up-- Based on the multiple streams framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. de Zeeuw, Aart, 2017. "Integrating Economics and the Environment," Other publications TiSEM 8c8f2f81-5797-4429-9066-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Steven J. Lade & Alessandro Tavoni & Simon A. Levin & Maja Schl�ter, 2013. "Regime shifts in a social-ecological system," GRI Working Papers 105, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    16. Krishnadas M. & K. P. Harikrishnan & G. Ambika, 2022. "Recurrence measures and transitions in stock market dynamics," Papers 2208.03456, arXiv.org.
    17. Kiran D’Souza & Bogdan I Epureanu & Mercedes Pascual, 2015. "Forecasting Bifurcations from Large Perturbation Recoveries in Feedback Ecosystems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Lumi, Neeme & Laas, Katrin & Mankin, Romi, 2015. "Rising relative fluctuation as a warning indicator of discontinuous transitions in symbiotic metapopulations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 437(C), pages 109-118.
    19. Georg Jäger & Manfred Füllsack, 2019. "Systematically false positives in early warning signal analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, February.
    20. William Lopes & Daniel R. Amor & Jeff Gore, 2024. "Cooperative growth in microbial communities is a driver of multistability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:484:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023001801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.