IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v481y2023ics0304380023000510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Higher functional diversity improves modeling of Amazon forest carbon storage

Author

Listed:
  • Rius, Bianca Fazio
  • Filho, João Paulo Darela
  • Fleischer, Katrin
  • Hofhansl, Florian
  • Blanco, Carolina Casagrande
  • Rammig, Anja
  • Domingues, Tomas Ferreira
  • Lapola, David Montenegro

Abstract

The impacts of reduced precipitation on plant functional diversity and how its components (richness, evenness, divergence and composition) modulate the Amazon carbon balance remain elusive. We present a novel trait-based approach, the CArbon and Ecosystem functional-Trait Evaluation (CAETÊ) model to investigate the role of plant trait diversity in representing vegetation carbon (C) storage and net primary productivity (NPP) in current climatic conditions. We assess impacts of plant functional diversity on vegetation C storage under low precipitation in the Amazon basin, by employing two approaches (low and high plant trait diversity, respectively): (i) a plant functional type (PFT) approach comprising three PFTs, and (ii) a trait-based approach representing 3000 plant life strategies (PLSs). The PFTs/PLSs are defined by combinations of six traits: C allocation and residence time in leaves, wood, and fine roots. We found that including trait variability improved the model's performance in representing NPP and vegetation C storage in the Amazon. When considering the whole basin, simulated reductions in precipitation caused vegetation C storage loss by ∼60% for both model approaches, while the PFT approach simulated a more widespread C loss and abrupt changes in neighboring grid cells. We found that owing to high trait variability in the trait-based approach, the plant community was able to functionally reorganize itself via changes in the relative abundance of different plant life strategies, which therefore resulted in the emergence of previously rare trait combinations in the model simulation. The trait-based approach yielded strategies that invest more heavily in fine roots to deal with limited water availability, which allowed the occupation of grid cells where none of the PFTs were able to establish. The prioritization of root investment at the expense of other tissues in response to drought has been observed in other studies. However, the higher investment in roots also had consequences: it resulted, for the trait-based approach, in a higher root:shoot ratio (a mean increase of 74.74%) leading to a lower vegetation C storage in some grid cells. Our findings highlight that accounting for plant functional diversity is crucial when evaluating the sensitivity of the Amazon forest to climate change, and therefore allow for a more mechanistic understanding of the role of biodiversity for tropical forest ecosystem functioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Rius, Bianca Fazio & Filho, João Paulo Darela & Fleischer, Katrin & Hofhansl, Florian & Blanco, Carolina Casagrande & Rammig, Anja & Domingues, Tomas Ferreira & Lapola, David Montenegro, 2023. "Higher functional diversity improves modeling of Amazon forest carbon storage," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:481:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023000510
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023000510
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boris Sakschewski & Werner von Bloh & Alice Boit & Lourens Poorter & Marielos Peña-Claros & Jens Heinke & Jasmin Joshi & Kirsten Thonicke, 2016. "Resilience of Amazon forests emerges from plant trait diversity," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1032-1036, November.
    2. Hans ter Steege & Nigel C. A. Pitman & Oliver L. Phillips & Jerome Chave & Daniel Sabatier & Alvaro Duque & Jean-François Molino & Marie-Françoise Prévost & Rodolphe Spichiger & Hernán Castellanos & P, 2006. "Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia," Nature, Nature, vol. 443(7110), pages 444-447, September.
    3. Sophie Fauset & Michelle O. Johnson & Manuel Gloor & Timothy R. Baker & Abel Monteagudo M. & Roel J.W. Brienen & Ted R. Feldpausch & Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez & Yadvinder Malhi & Hans ter Steege & Nigel, 2015. "Hyperdominance in Amazonian forest carbon cycling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, November.
    4. Peter M. Cox & Richard A. Betts & Chris D. Jones & Steven A. Spall & Ian J. Totterdell, 2000. "Erratum: Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6813), pages 750-750, December.
    5. Peter M. Cox & Richard A. Betts & Chris D. Jones & Steven A. Spall & Ian J. Totterdell, 2000. "Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6809), pages 184-187, November.
    6. L. Rowland & A. C. L. da Costa & D. R. Galbraith & R. S. Oliveira & O. J. Binks & A. A. R. Oliveira & A. M. Pullen & C. E. Doughty & D. B. Metcalfe & S. S. Vasconcelos & L. V. Ferreira & Y. Malhi & J., 2015. "Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation," Nature, Nature, vol. 528(7580), pages 119-122, December.
    7. David Tilman & Peter B. Reich & Johannes M. H. Knops, 2006. "Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7093), pages 629-632, June.
    8. Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez & Yadvinder Malhi & Simon L. Lewis & Sophie Fauset & Stephen Adu-Bredu & Kofi Affum-Baffoe & Timothy R. Baker & Agne Gvozdevaite & Wannes Hubau & Sam Moore & Theresa Peprah & K, 2020. "Long-term droughts may drive drier tropical forests towards increased functional, taxonomic and phylogenetic homogeneity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Wannes Hubau & Simon L. Lewis & Oliver L. Phillips & Kofi Affum-Baffoe & Hans Beeckman & Aida Cuní-Sanchez & Armandu K. Daniels & Corneille E. N. Ewango & Sophie Fauset & Jacques M. Mukinzi & Douglas , 2020. "Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests," Nature, Nature, vol. 579(7797), pages 80-87, March.
    10. A. Baccini & S. J. Goetz & W. S. Walker & N. T. Laporte & M. Sun & D. Sulla-Menashe & J. Hackler & P. S. A. Beck & R. Dubayah & M. A. Friedl & S. Samanta & R. A. Houghton, 2012. "Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(3), pages 182-185, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yonghua Li & Song Yao & Hezhou Jiang & Huarong Wang & Qinchuan Ran & Xinyun Gao & Xinyi Ding & Dandong Ge, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage: An Integrated Framework Based on the MOP–PLUS–InVEST Model and an Applied Case Study in Hangzhou, East China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Kogan, Konstantin & El Ouardighi, Fouad, 2024. "Environmental sustainability under production competition with costly adjustments: An appraisal of firms’ behavior with regard to pollution dynamics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Fouad El Ouardighi & Eugene Khmelnitsky & Marc Leandri, 2020. "Production-based pollution versus deforestation: optimal policy with state-independent and-dependent environmental absorption efficiency restoration process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Eliseev, Alexey V. & Mokhov, Igor I., 2008. "Eventual saturation of the climate–carbon cycle feedback studied with a conceptual model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 127-132.
    5. Brovkin, Victor & Cherkinsky, Alexander & Goryachkin, Sergey, 2008. "Estimating soil carbon turnover using radiocarbon data: A case-study for European Russia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 178-187.
    6. Ulaganathan, Kandasamy & Goud, Sravanthi & Reddy, Madhavi & Kayalvili, Ulaganathan, 2017. "Genome engineering for breaking barriers in lignocellulosic bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1080-1107.
    7. Agudelo, César Augusto Ruiz & Bustos, Sandra Liliana Hurtado & Moreno, Carmen Alicia Parrado, 2020. "Modeling interactions among multiple ecosystem services. A critical review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    8. Ouardighi, Fouad El & Sim, Jeong Eun & Kim, Bowon, 2016. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 982-996.
    9. Farrelly, Damien J. & Everard, Colm D. & Fagan, Colette C. & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 712-727.
    10. Khizar Abid & Andrés Felipe Baena Velásquez & Catalin Teodoriu, 2024. "Comprehensive Comparative Review of the Cement Experimental Testing Under CO 2 Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-57, November.
    11. U. Persson & Christian Azar, 2007. "Tropical deforestation in a future international climate policy regime—lessons from the Brazilian Amazon," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(7), pages 1277-1304, August.
    12. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Jing & Wei, Xiaolan & Ding, Jing & Wang, Xiaoxing & Song, Chunshan, 2014. "Development of a new clay supported polyethylenimine composite for CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 334-341.
    13. Arce, G.L.A.F. & Carvalho, J.A. & Nascimento, L.F.C., 2014. "A time series sequestration and storage model of atmospheric carbon dioxide," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 59-67.
    14. Sato, Hisashi & Itoh, Akihiko & Kohyama, Takashi, 2007. "SEIB–DGVM: A new Dynamic Global Vegetation Model using a spatially explicit individual-based approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 279-307.
    15. Fouad El Ouardighi & Hassan Benchekroun & Dieter Grass, 2016. "Self-regenerating environmental absorption efficiency and the $$\varvec{ soylent~green~scenario}$$ s o y l e n t g r e e n s c e n a r i o," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 179-198, March.
    16. Cuce, Pinar Mert & Riffat, Saffa, 2015. "A comprehensive review of heat recovery systems for building applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 665-682.
    17. Francesco Lamperti & Giovanni Dosi & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini & Alessandro Sapio, 2018. "And then he wasn't a she : Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based integrated assessment model," Working Papers hal-03443464, HAL.
    18. Lamperti, F. & Dosi, G. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2020. "Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based integrated assessment model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Elizabeth Kopits & Alex L. Marten & Ann Wolverton, 2013. "Moving Forward with Incorporating "Catastrophic" Climate Change into Policy Analysis," NCEE Working Paper Series 201301, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Jan 2013.
    20. Yuting Zhou & Grace E. Klinger & Eric L. Hegg & Christopher M. Saffron & James E. Jackson, 2022. "Skeletal Ni electrode-catalyzed C-O cleavage of diaryl ethers entails direct elimination via benzyne intermediates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:481:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023000510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.