IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v470y2022ics0304380022001144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using system equalization principle to study the effects of multiple factors to the development of bee colony

Author

Listed:
  • Hong, Wei
  • Chen, Bingxue
  • Lu, Yuntao
  • Lu, Chuanqi
  • Liu, Shengping

Abstract

In recent years, frequent outbreaks of bee colony collapse have seriously threatened food production and ecological balance. Many scholars have studied different factors and formed a consensus that multiple factors jointly cause the colony collapse. However, it is still a challenge to understand the effects of multiple factors on bee colony development due to the complex microcosmic mechanism of each factor. Based on the principle of system equilibrium, this paper models the macroscopic dynamics of bee colony with three core states: the stocks of food, the population of adult bees and the population of larval bees, and the internal and external factors have been abstracted as the model parameters. The mathematical criteria for the benign development of bee colonies are presented from the idea of system stability, and the effects of multiple factors are studied by critical parameter perturbation and Monte Carlo simulation. The results show that the population of adults is most likely to be influenced by multiple factors, that is to say, the observations related to adults, such as the total number of adults and the number/frequency of adults entering and leaving the nest, can more quickly reflect the health status of bee colony, which provides a theoretical basis for experimental studies. Meanwhile, this study reveals the effects of multiple factors on the development of bee colonies from the level of system equilibrium, which is of great significance for understanding the collapse of bee colonies in recent years. Further, according to monitoring the three core states, the trend changes of them could be used to diagnose the healthy problems of actual bee colonies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong, Wei & Chen, Bingxue & Lu, Yuntao & Lu, Chuanqi & Liu, Shengping, 2022. "Using system equalization principle to study the effects of multiple factors to the development of bee colony," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:470:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001144
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022001144
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winfree, Rachael & Gross, Brian J. & Kremen, Claire, 2011. "Valuing pollination services to agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 80-88.
    2. Russell, Stephen & Barron, Andrew B. & Harris, David, 2013. "Dynamic modelling of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony growth and failure," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 158-169.
    3. Giannini, Tereza C. & Acosta, André L. & Garófalo, Carlos A. & Saraiva, Antonio M. & Alves-dos-Santos, Isabel & Imperatriz-Fonseca, Vera L., 2012. "Pollination services at risk: Bee habitats will decrease owing to climate change in Brazil," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 127-131.
    4. Kuan, A. Carmen & DeGrandi-Hoffman, Gloria & Curry, Robert J. & Garber, Kristina V. & Kanarek, Andrew R. & Snyder, Marcia N. & Wolfe, Kurt L. & Purucker, S. Thomas, 2018. "Sensitivity analyses for simulating pesticide impacts on honey bee colonies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 376(C), pages 15-27.
    5. Juliana Pereira Lisboa Mohallem Paiva & Henrique Mohallem Paiva & Elisa Esposito & Michelle Manfrini Morais, 2016. "On the Effects of Artificial Feeding on Bee Colony Dynamics: A Mathematical Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Betti, Matthew I. & Lee, Isaac, 2020. "The effects of diploid male production on honey bee colony evolution and survival," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 49-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Byela Tibesigwa, 2018. "Naturally Available Pollinator Decline Will Decrease Household Food and Increase Gender-Gap in Nutrition between Men and Women Who Head Smallholder Farm Households in Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 741, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    2. Rafaella Guimarães Porto & Rita Fernandes Almeida & Oswaldo Cruz-Neto & Marcelo Tabarelli & Blandina Felipe Viana & Carlos A. Peres & Ariadna Valentina Lopes, 2020. "Pollination ecosystem services: A comprehensive review of economic values, research funding and policy actions," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1425-1442, December.
    3. Tibesigwa , Byela, 2018. "Naturally Available Pollinator Decline Will Decrease Household Food Security and Increase the Gender Gap in Nutrition between Men and Women Who Head Smallholder Farm Households in Sub-Saharan Africa," EfD Discussion Paper 18-5, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    4. Joanne Lee Picknoll & Pieter Poot & Michael Renton, 2021. "A New Approach to Inform Restoration and Management Decisions for Sustainable Apiculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Lippert, Christian & Feuerbacher, Arndt & Narjes, Manuel, 2021. "Revisiting the economic valuation of agricultural losses due to large-scale changes in pollinator populations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Jorge Velásquez-Tibatá & María H Olaya-Rodríguez & Daniel López-Lozano & César Gutiérrez & Iván González & María C Londoño-Murcia, 2019. "BioModelos: A collaborative online system to map species distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Basualdo, Marina & Cavigliasso, Pablo & de Avila, Rubem Samuel & Aldea-Sánchez, Patricia & Correa-Benítez, Adriana & Harms, Jaime Martínez & Ramos, Ana Karen & Rojas-Bravo, Valeska & Salvarrey, Sheena, 2022. "Current status and economic value of insect-pollinated dependent crops in Latin America," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Goodrich, Brittney K. & Goodhue, Rachael E., 2020. "Are All Colonies Created Equal? The Role of Honey Bee Colony Strength in Almond Pollination Contracts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    9. Tremlett, Constance J. & Peh, Kelvin S.-H. & Zamora-Gutierrez, Veronica & Schaafsma, Marije, 2021. "Value and benefit distribution of pollination services provided by bats in the production of cactus fruits in central Mexico," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    10. Tibesigwa, Byela & Siikamäki, Juha & Lokina, Razack & Alvsilver, Jessica, 2018. "Naturally Available Wild Pollination Services Have Economic Value for Nature Dependent Small-Holder Crop Farms in Tanzania," EfD Discussion Paper 18-15, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    11. Bettina Wenzel & Julian Winkler & Sascha M. Kirchner & Stephan Martin Junge & Pedro Mendonça & Fátima Alves & Hella Kehlenbeck, 2024. "Improving ecosystem services through applied agroecology on German farms: costs and benefits," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Gutiérrez-Arellano, Claudia & Mulligan, Mark, 2020. "Small-sized protected areas contribute more per unit area to tropical crop pollination than large protected areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    13. Hong Zhang & Chao Han & Tom D. Breeze & Mengdan Li & Shibonage K. Mashilingi & Jun Hua & Wenbin Zhang & Xuebin Zhang & Shiwen Zhang & Jiandong An, 2022. "Bumblebee Pollination Enhances Yield and Flavor of Tomato in Gobi Desert Greenhouses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Betti, Matthew I. & Lee, Isaac, 2020. "The effects of diploid male production on honey bee colony evolution and survival," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 49-55.
    15. Kleftodimos, Georgios & Gallai, Nicola & Rozakis, Stelios & Képhaliacos, Charilaos, 2021. "A farm-level ecological-economic approach of the inclusion of pollination services in arable crop farms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Hanley, Nick & Breeze, Tom D. & Ellis, Ciaran & Goulson, David, 2015. "Measuring the economic value of pollination services: Principles, evidence and knowledge gaps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 124-132.
    17. Melathopoulos, Andony P. & Cutler, G. Christopher & Tyedmers, Peter, 2015. "Where is the value in valuing pollination ecosystem services to agriculture?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 59-70.
    18. Juliana Pereira Lisboa Mohallem Paiva & Henrique Mohallem Paiva & Elisa Esposito & Michelle Manfrini Morais, 2016. "On the Effects of Artificial Feeding on Bee Colony Dynamics: A Mathematical Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Kaloveloni, Aggeliki & Tscheulin, Thomas & Vujić, Ante & Radenković, Snežana & Petanidou, Theodora, 2015. "Winners and losers of climate change for the genus Merodon (Diptera: Syrphidae) across the Balkan Peninsula," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 201-211.
    20. Zheng, Yanan & Goodhue, Rachael E., 2022. "Intensive or Extensive Margin Effects? Growers’ Responses to the Restriction of High-Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Pesticide Products in the San Joaquin Valley, California," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322085, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:470:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.