IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v468y2022ics0304380022000709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An EasyCA model with few steady variables and clone stamp strategy for simulation of urban growth in metropolitan areas

Author

Listed:
  • Ai, Bin
  • Xie, Dixiang
  • Ma, Shifa
  • Jiang, Haiyan

Abstract

It is critical to predict urban growth for understanding of urbanization process. Traditional urban CA mainly focused on discovery of conversion rules from a series of biophysical and social-economic factors. Many varying factors are generally treated as constant, and the simulation result is none of great reference value for decision-making. In order to eliminate these limitations, an Easy Cellular Automata (EasyCA) was proposed with integration of seed searching and clone stamp growth strategy, it aims to provide feasible scenario analysis for decision-making. Only four steady variables namely distance to current urban patches, difficulty coefficient of land conversion, density of urban land and topographic conditions were applied to estimate urban suitability. Policy intervention was further considered for adjustment of urban suitability, and patch growth templates were collected as clone stamps for updating the status of cells during iteration. This EasyCA was then tested with example area of Guangzhou City located in the Pearl River Delta of China. Accuracy indices of averaged fuzzy kappa (FuzzyK) and figure of merit (FOM) were calculated with the values of 0.8419 and 0.2874, respectively, and both of them were higher than those from cell growth-based CA, indicating that EasyCA is efficient in utility and reliability. Comparison analysis verified that few steady variables can obtain reliable result of urban suitability, and it is greatly necessary to integrate policy intervention into estimation of urban growth probability. And the simulation pattern in 2035 is maximally close to actual status compared with the planning layout, it shows that EasyCA is potentially applicable and effective for planning practices in metropolitan areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Ai, Bin & Xie, Dixiang & Ma, Shifa & Jiang, Haiyan, 2022. "An EasyCA model with few steady variables and clone stamp strategy for simulation of urban growth in metropolitan areas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000709
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022000709
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Pontius & Wideke Boersma & Jean-Christophe Castella & Keith Clarke & Ton Nijs & Charles Dietzel & Zengqiang Duan & Eric Fotsing & Noah Goldstein & Kasper Kok & Eric Koomen & Christopher Lippitt, 2008. "Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(1), pages 11-37, March.
    2. Mustafa, Ahmed & Cools, Mario & Saadi, Ismaïl & Teller, Jacques, 2017. "Coupling agent-based, cellular automata and logistic regression into a hybrid urban expansion model (HUEM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 529-540.
    3. González-Méndez, Mauricio & Olaya, Camilo & Fasolino, Isidoro & Grimaldi, Michele & Obregón, Nelson, 2021. "Agent-Based Modeling for Urban Development Planning based on Human Needs. Conceptual Basis and Model Formulation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Guzman, Luis A. & Escobar, Francisco & Peña, Javier & Cardona, Rafael, 2020. "A cellular automata-based land-use model as an integrated spatial decision support system for urban planning in developing cities: The case of the Bogotá region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Meng, Liting & Sun, Yan & Zhao, Shuqing, 2020. "Comparing the spatial and temporal dynamics of urban expansion in Guangzhou and Shenzhen from 1975 to 2015: A case study of pioneer cities in China’s rapid urbanization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boxuan Zhao & Shujie Li & Zhaoshun Liu, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Prediction of Regional Habitat Quality Based on a System Dynamic and Patch-Generating Land-Use Simulation Coupling Model—A Case Study of Jilin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Xinxin & Wang, Haijun & Xiao, Fentao, 2022. "Simulating urban growth affected by national and regional land use policies: Case study from Wuhan, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Zhang, Yan & Chang, Xia & Liu, Yanfang & Lu, Yanchi & Wang, Yiheng & Liu, Yaolin, 2021. "Urban expansion simulation under constraint of multiple ecosystem services (MESs) based on cellular automata (CA)-Markov model: Scenario analysis and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Yong Lai & Guangqing Huang & Shengzhong Chen & Shaotao Lin & Wenjun Lin & Jixin Lyu, 2021. "Land Use Dynamics and Optimization from 2000 to 2020 in East Guangdong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Yang, Yuanyuan & Bao, Wenkai & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Scenario simulation of land system change in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Xu, Tingting & Gao, Jay & Li, Yuhua, 2019. "Machine learning-assisted evaluation of land use policies and plans in a rapidly urbanizing district in Chongqing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Aritta Suwarno & Meine van Noordwijk & Hans-Peter Weikard & Desi Suyamto, 2018. "Indonesia’s forest conversion moratorium assessed with an agent-based model of Land-Use Change and Ecosystem Services (LUCES)," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 211-229, February.
    7. Xia, Min & Zhang, Yanyuan & Zhang, Zihong & Liu, Jingjie & Ou, Weixin & Zou, Wei, 2020. "Modeling agricultural land use change in a rapid urbanizing town: Linking the decisions of government, peasant households and enterprises," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Ju-Sung Lee & Tatiana Filatova & Arika Ligmann-Zielinska & Behrooz Hassani-Mahmooei & Forrest Stonedahl & Iris Lorscheid & Alexey Voinov & J. Gareth Polhill & Zhanli Sun & Dawn C. Parker, 2015. "The Complexities of Agent-Based Modeling Output Analysis," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(4), pages 1-4.
    9. Margaret Gitau & Nathaniel Bailey, 2012. "Multi-Layer Assessment of Land Use and Related Changes for Decision Support in a Coastal Zone Watershed," Land, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Xiaoli Hu & Xin Li & Ling Lu, 2018. "Modeling the Land Use Change in an Arid Oasis Constrained by Water Resources and Environmental Policy Change Using Cellular Automata Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Charlotte Shade & Peleg Kremer, 2019. "Predicting Land Use Changes in Philadelphia Following Green Infrastructure Policies," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Wu, Wei & Yeager, Kevin M. & Peterson, Mark S. & Fulford, Richard S., 2015. "Neutral models as a way to evaluate the Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 303(C), pages 55-69.
    13. Jaekyung Lee & Galen Newman & Yunmi Park, 2018. "A Comparison of Vacancy Dynamics between Growing and Shrinking Cities Using the Land Transformation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Prashanti Sharma & Rajesh Bahadur Thapa & Mir Abdul Matin, 2020. "Examining forest cover change and deforestation drivers in Taunggyi District, Shan State, Myanmar," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5521-5538, August.
    15. Cláudia M. Viana & Jorge Rocha, 2020. "Evaluating Dominant Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Predicting Future Scenario in a Rural Region Using a Memoryless Stochastic Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, May.
    16. Javier Muro & Leo Zurita-Arthos & José Jara & Esteban Calderón & Richard Resl & Andreas Rienow & Valerie Graw, 2020. "Earth Observation for Settlement Mapping of Amazonian Indigenous Populations to Support SDG7," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    17. van Vliet, Jasper & Hagen-Zanker, Alex & Hurkens, Jelle & van Delden, Hedwig, 2013. "A fuzzy set approach to assess the predictive accuracy of land use simulations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 261, pages 32-42.
    18. Chun Li & Jianhua He & Xingwu Duan, 2020. "Modeling the Collaborative Evolution of Urban Land Considering Urban Interactions under Intermediate Intervention, in the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Yang, Chen & Zhao, Shuqing, 2022. "Urban vertical profiles of three most urbanized Chinese cities and the spatial coupling with horizontal urban expansion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    20. Ramita Manandhar & Inakwu O.A. Odeh & Tihomir Ancev, 2014. "Assessment of Spatial-Temporal Expansion of Built-up and Residential-Commercial Dwellings with Some Economic Implications: A Case Study in the Lower Hunter of Eastern Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.