IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v468y2022ics0304380022000515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of several models for estimating gross primary production of drip-irrigated maize in arid regions

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Hui
  • Li, Sien
  • Kang, Shaozhong
  • Du, Taisheng
  • Liu, Wenfeng
  • Tong, Ling
  • Hao, Xinmei
  • Ding, Risheng

Abstract

Gross primary productivity (GPP) is the total amount of carbon absorbed by green plants through photosynthesis. As an important part of the global carbon cycle, photosynthesis is the process of converting solar energy into chemical energy. Therefore, accurate estimation of GPP is important for understanding the regional and global carbon flux variations. Based on the flux data of spring maize under drip irrigation in northwest China during 2014∼2018, this study compared and evaluated the simulation accuracy of several models for estimating GPP under different growing seasons and environmental conditions, and optimized the rectangular hyperbolic (RH) model. The results showed that none of these models consistently had the highest simulation accuracy over a 5-year period. The total GPP simulated by the light response photosynthetic models was closer to the observed value than the light use efficiency (LUE) model and stomatal conductance models. Under different growing stages and environmental conditions, the simulation accuracy of different models was different: (1) RH model had the best simulation effect when the maize was completely covered (i.e. LAI>2), but stomatal conductance-photosynthesis-transpiration coupling (SMPT-SB) model had the best simulation effect in the early growing stage; (2) when the soil water content was high, RH model has the best simulation effect. On the contrary, the simulation effect of the non-rectangular hyperbolic (N-RH) model was slightly better than other models; (3) the LUE model has a strong dependence on light conditions. Therefore, when Rn≤100, all the other 8 models except the LUE model could well simulate GPP. When Rn>100, the RH model had the best simulation effect; (4) when VPD≤1.5, the simulation accuracy of RH model was the highest; when VPD>1.5, SMPT-SB had the best simulation effect. To obtain parameters in the models more quickly and accurately, we improved the RH model by establishing the relationship between maximum photosynthetic rate (Pmax) and leaf area index (LAI), initial quantum efficiency (α) and LAI, and obtained the RH-LAI model. Compared with the RH model, the simulation accuracy of the improved RH-LAI model was improved. And the reliability of the RH-LAI model was verified in other sites. Therefore, the research results showed that in the regions with fewer observation indexes, we can use the RH-LAI model with a simple structure and convenient calculation to calculate the daily GPP by integrating it on the time scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Hui & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Liu, Wenfeng & Tong, Ling & Hao, Xinmei & Ding, Risheng, 2022. "Comparison of several models for estimating gross primary production of drip-irrigated maize in arid regions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000515
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022000515
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Qinsi & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Yang, Hanbo & Qin, Shujing, 2018. "Simulation of water balance in a maize field under film-mulching drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 252-260.
    2. Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Lu & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Guo, Weihua & Zhao, Peng & Chen, Xia & Xiao, Huan, 2015. "Ecosystem water use efficiency for a sparse vineyard in arid northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 24-33.
    3. Zhang, Liang-Xia & Zhou, De-Cheng & Fan, Jiang-Wen & Hu, Zhong-Min, 2015. "Comparison of four light use efficiency models for estimating terrestrial gross primary production," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 300(C), pages 30-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yi & Zeng, Wenzhi & Ao, Chang & Lei, Guoqing & Wu, Jingwei & Huang, Jiesheng & Gaiser, Thomas & Srivastava, Amit Kumar, 2022. "Optimization of winter irrigation management for salinized farmland using a coupled model of soil water flow and crop growth," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    2. Ran, Hui & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Zhang, Xiaotao, 2018. "Parameterization of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated maize for seed production in arid Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 438-450.
    3. Yi, Jun & Li, Huijie & Zhao, Ying & Shao, Ming'an & Zhang, Hailin & Liu, Muxing, 2022. "Assessing soil water balance to optimize irrigation schedules of flood-irrigated maize fields with different cultivation histories in the arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Gao, Lei & Zhao, Peng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Lu, Hongna, 2019. "Surface soil water content dominates the difference between ecosystem and canopy water use efficiency in a sparse vineyard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Wang, Yahui & Li, Sien & Qin, Shujing & Guo, Hui & Yang, Danni & Lam, Hon-Ming, 2020. "How can drip irrigation save water and reduce evapotranspiration compared to border irrigation in arid regions in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    6. Liu, Meihan & Paredes, Paula & Shi, Haibin & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dou, Xu & Dai, Liping & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Impacts of a shallow saline water table on maize evapotranspiration and groundwater contribution using static water table lysimeters and the dual Kc water balance model SIMDualKc," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    7. Wang, Chunyu & Li, Sien & Wu, Mousong & Zhang, Wenxin & Guo, Zhenyu & Huang, Siyu & Yang, Danni, 2023. "Co-regulation of temperature and moisture in the irrigated agricultural ecosystem productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Zhang, Junwei & Xiang, Lingxiao & Zhu, Chenxi & Li, Wuqiang & Jing, Dan & Zhang, Lili & Liu, Yong & Li, Tianlai & Li, Jianming, 2023. "Evaluating the irrigation schedules of greenhouse tomato by simulating soil water balance under drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Chen, Rui & Chang, Hongda & Wang, Zhenhua & Lin, Haixia, 2023. "Determining organic-inorganic fertilizer application threshold to maximize the yield and quality of drip-irrigated grapes in an extremely arid area of Xinjiang, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    10. Yu, Qihua & Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Lu & Hu, Shunjun & Li, Yunfeng & Parsons, David, 2023. "Incorporating new functions into the WAVES model, to better simulate cotton production under film mulching and severe salinity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    11. Chen, Ning & Li, Xianyue & Šimůnek, Jirí & Shi, Haibin & Ding, Zongjiang & Peng, Zunyuan, 2019. "Evaluating the effects of biodegradable film mulching on soil water dynamics in a drip-irrigated field," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Guo, Hui & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Liu, Wenfeng & Tong, Ling & Hao, Xinmei & Ding, Risheng, 2022. "The controlling factors of ecosystem water use efficiency in maize fields under drip and border irrigation systems in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    13. Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Wang, Hanbo & Caylor, Kelly K., 2017. "Comparison of multi-level water use efficiency between plastic film partially mulched and non-mulched croplands at eastern Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 215-226.
    14. Zhao, Peng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Tong, Ling & Du, Taisheng, 2018. "Seasonal variations in vineyard ET partitioning and dual crop coefficients correlate with canopy development and surface soil moisture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 19-33.
    15. Liyuan Bo & Xiaomin Mao & Yali Wang, 2022. "Assessing the Applicability of Biodegradable Film Mulching in Northwest China Based on Comprehensive Benefits Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Zhang, Junpeng & Li, Kejiang & Gao, Yang & Feng, Di & Zheng, Chunlian & Cao, Caiyun & Sun, Jingsheng & Dang, Hongkai & Hamani, Abdoul Kader Mounkaila, 2022. "Evaluation of saline water irrigation on cotton growth and yield using the AquaCrop crop simulation model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    17. Guo, Hui & Zhou, Xiao & Dong, Yi & Wang, Yahui & Li, Sien, 2023. "On the use of machine learning methods to improve the estimation of gross primary productivity of maize field with drip irrigation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    18. Wang, Yu & Zhou, Li & Jia, Qingyu & Yu, Wenying, 2017. "Water use efficiency of a rice paddy field in Liaohe Delta, Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 222-231.
    19. Xing, Wanqiu & Yang, Lilin & Wang, Weiguang & Yu, Zhongbo & Shao, Quanxi & Xu, Shiqin & Fu, Jianyu, 2023. "Environmental controls on carbon and water fluxes of a wheat-maize rotation cropland over the Huaibei Plain of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    20. Pang, Jiaping & Li, Hengpeng & Yu, Fuhe & Geng, Jianwei & Zhang, Wangshou, 2022. "Environmental controls on water use efficiency in a hilly tea plantation in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.