IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v460y2021ics0304380021002921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating migration of wind-borne pests: “Deconstructing” representation of the emigration process

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan
  • Grant, William E.
  • Koralewski, Tomasz E.
  • Brewer, Michael J.
  • Elliott, Norman C.

Abstract

Models capable of simulating both local population dynamics and long-range dispersal of wind-borne pests show promise as components of adaptive areawide pest management programs. Local life cycles and long-range wind-borne transport patterns, especially for small weak fliers, are relatively well-understood. However, modelling proximate causes of emigration from crop fields (and, hence, subsequent infestation of remote crop fields) remains a challenge. We present results of a robustness analysis (RA) in which we systematically “deconstructed” the representation of emigration in a recent model that forecasts regional infestations of North American sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) fields by the sugarcane aphid (Melanaphis sacchari). Results of RA suggested that forecasts of emigration timing were robust, whereas forecasts of emigration magnitude were not. For all deconstructed versions of the model, the time lag between initial infestation of a sorghum field and first emigration of aphids from that field was consistently (in ≈83% of the simulations) less than a week. However, total magnitude of emigration from any given sorghum field differed among model versions by as much as 4- or 5-fold, or by hundreds of thousands of aphids. Placing these RA results within the context of areawide aphid management, they suggest a shift in modelling priorities from further refinement of details representing local population dynamics and magnitudes of emigration events to accurate representation of the dispersion and deposition of migrating aphids. Since (1) forecasted time lags between initial infestation and first emigration were both robust to changes in representation of the emigration process and of short duration, and (2) time lags between a small initial infestation and populations reaching the lower action threshold for pesticide application also can be of short duration, forecasted magnitudes of emigration, in addition to being non-robust, were of marginal utility within an areawide forecasting context. (We hasten to note that details of the terrestrial portion of the aphid life cycle are of the utmost importance from the perspective of modelling local population increase and means of suppression, but that is not our focus here.) Placing our results within the broader context of simulating long-range migration of wind-borne pests as a component of adaptive areawide pest management programs, we advocate the systematic deconstruction of local-scale insect pest models as a matter of habit. Systematic deconstruction could identify robust simplifications that could facilitate linking local-scale models to existing atmospheric transport models, thus increasing transferability of local-levels models from one system to another.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Grant, William E. & Koralewski, Tomasz E. & Brewer, Michael J. & Elliott, Norman C., 2021. "Simulating migration of wind-borne pests: “Deconstructing” representation of the emigration process," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 460(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:460:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021002921
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021002921
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109742?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koralewski, Tomasz E. & Westbrook, John K. & Grant, William E. & Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan, 2019. "Coupling general physical environmental process models with specific question-driven ecological simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 102-105.
    2. Matis, James H. & Kiffe, Thomas R. & van der Werf, Wopke & Costamagna, Alejandro C. & Matis, Timothy I. & Grant, William E., 2009. "Population dynamics models based on cumulative density dependent feedback: A link to the logistic growth curve and a test for symmetry using aphid data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1745-1751.
    3. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Robustness analysis: Deconstructing computational models for ecological theory and applications," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 162-167.
    4. Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Grant, William E. & Elliott, Norman C. & Brewer, Michael J. & Koralewski, Tomasz E. & Westbrook, John K. & Alves, Tavvs M. & Sword, Gregory A., 2019. "Integrated modelling of the life cycle and aeroecology of wind-borne pests in temporally-variable spatially-heterogeneous environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 399(C), pages 23-38.
    5. Bruce Edmonds & David Hales, 2003. "Replication, Replication and Replication: Some Hard Lessons from Model Alignmen," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11.
    6. Glick, P. A., 1939. "The Distribution of Insects, Spiders, and Mites in the Air," Technical Bulletins 168268, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Grant, William E. & Koralewski, Tomasz E. & Elliott, Norman C. & Brewer, Michael J. & Westbrook, John K., 2020. "Where do all the aphids go? A series of thought experiments within the context of area-wide pest management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Piyaratne, M.K.D.K. & Zhao, Huiyan & Meng, Qingxiang, 2013. "APHIDSim: A population dynamics model for wheat aphids based on swallowtail catastrophe theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 9-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Grant, William E. & Koralewski, Tomasz E. & Elliott, Norman C. & Brewer, Michael J. & Westbrook, John K., 2020. "Where do all the aphids go? A series of thought experiments within the context of area-wide pest management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Koralewski, Tomasz E. & Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Grant, William E. & Brewer, Michael J. & Elliott, Norman C., 2023. "Error propagation in an integrated spatially-explicit individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    3. Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Grant, William E. & Elliott, Norman C. & Brewer, Michael J. & Koralewski, Tomasz E. & Westbrook, John K. & Alves, Tavvs M. & Sword, Gregory A., 2019. "Integrated modelling of the life cycle and aeroecology of wind-borne pests in temporally-variable spatially-heterogeneous environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 399(C), pages 23-38.
    4. Happe, K. & Kellermann, K., 2008. "Diese Modelle sind zu komplex! – oder doch nicht?: Experimentelles Design und Metamodellierung als möglicher Weg, das Kommunikationsproblem agentenbasierter Modelle in der Politikanalyse zu lösen," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43, March.
    5. Lorscheid, Iris & Meyer, Matthias, 2016. "Divide and conquer: Configuring submodels for valid and efficient analyses of complex simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 152-161.
    6. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: Synthesis from a special issue," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 177-187.
    7. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    8. J. Gareth Polhill & Dawn C. Parker & Daniel Brown & Volker Grimm, 2008. "Using the ODD Protocol for Describing Three Agent-Based Social Simulation Models of Land-Use Change," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(2), pages 1-3.
    9. J. Gareth Polhill & Bruce Edmonds, 2007. "Open Access for Social Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 10(3), pages 1-10.
    10. Happe, Kathrin & Kellermann, Konrad, 2007. "DIESE MODELLE SIND ZU KOMPLEX!-ODER DOCH NICHT?: EXPERIMENTELLES DESIGN UND METAMODELLIERUNG ALS MOGLICHER WEG, DAS KOMMUNIKATIONSPROBLEM AGENTENBASIERTER MODELLE IN DER POLITIKANALYSE ZU LOSEN (Germa," 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007 7613, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    11. Dong Yang & Mengyuan Dang & Lingwen Sun & Feng Han & Feng Shi & Hongbo Zhang & Hongjun Zhang, 2021. "A System Dynamics Model for Urban Residential Building Stock towards Sustainability: The Case of Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Julian Zappala & Brian Logan, 2010. "Effects of resource availability on consensus decision making in primates," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 400-415, December.
    13. Wood, Kevin A. & Hilton, Geoff M. & Newth, Julia L. & Rees, Eileen C., 2019. "Seasonal variation in energy gain explains patterns of resource use by avian herbivores in an agricultural landscape: Insights from a mechanistic model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 409(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Mario Paolucci & Francisco Grimaldo, 2014. "Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(3), pages 663-688, June.
    15. Heinrich, Torsten, 2016. "The Narrow and the Broad Approach to Evolutionary Modeling in Economics," MPRA Paper 75797, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Hood, Raleigh R. & Shenk, Gary W. & Dixon, Rachel L. & Smith, Sean M.C. & Ball, William P. & Bash, Jesse O. & Batiuk, Rich & Boomer, Kathy & Brady, Damian C. & Cerco, Carl & Claggett, Peter & de Mutse, 2021. "The Chesapeake Bay program modeling system: Overview and recommendations for future development," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    17. Jannis Beese & M. Kazem Haki & Stephan Aier & Robert Winter, 2019. "Simulation-Based Research in Information Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 503-521, August.
    18. Janssen, Marco A., 2007. "Coordination in irrigation systems: An analysis of the Lansing-Kremer model of Bali," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 93(1-3), pages 170-190, March.
    19. Juliette Rouchier & Claudio Cioffi-Revilla & J. Gareth Polhill & Keiki Takadama, 2008. "Progress in Model-To-Model Analysis," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(2), pages 1-8.
    20. Uri Wilensky & William Rand, 2007. "Making Models Match: Replicating an Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 10(4), pages 1-2.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:460:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021002921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.