IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v443y2021ics0304380021000235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Space matters: host spatial structure and the dynamics of plague transmission

Author

Listed:
  • Russell, Robin E.
  • Walsh, Daniel P.
  • Samuel, Michael D.
  • Grunnill, Martin D.
  • Rocke, Tonie E.

Abstract

The development of models to elucidate the transmission pathways and dynamics of wildlife diseases remains challenging. Sylvatic plague, caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis (Yp), is an infectious zoonotic disease that primarily affects wild rodents, including prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) in North America. Proposed transmission pathways for Yp include flea bites, direct contacts between hosts, and environmental reservoirs (e.g. soil, carcasses). We developed a spatially explicit, agent-based model of Yp transmission to explore the effects of alternative transmission pathways, different disease initiation mechanisms (host or fleas), parameter uncertainty, and spatial structure of hosts. A particularly novel aspect of our model was the integration of ecological models with traditional disease models. Specifically, we used estimates from spatial capture-recapture models to generate data-driven spatial distributions, densities, and contact rates to capture the spatial structure of prairie dogs. We simulated ~9 million scenarios across a wide range of parameter values and conducted sensitivity analyses to determine the most influential parameters on the number of flea-days (sum of the mean number of fleas on hosts each day of the simulation), number of newly infected hosts per day, the time to depopulation (<20 prairie dogs remaining), and the proportion of the prairie dog population remaining at the end of the simulation (after 150 days). When including spatial structure, we found the probability of transmission via environmental sources of Yp (i.e. carcasses) had the greatest influence on model results when Yp infection was initiated in prairie dog hosts, rather than in fleas. Conversely, the mechanism of transmission by fleas to prairie dogs had the greatest influence on model results when Yp infection was initiated in fleas (i.e. via introduction by carnivores, a migrant prairie dog, or other mammalian host). Uncertainty in parameter estimates, particularly those related to the transmission pathways of Yp, continue to hamper efforts to realistically model plague dynamics in wild rodents. Our results elucidate the complexity of the flea-plague-prairie dog system and reiterate the importance of research on Yp transmission mechanisms to provide a full understanding of this disease. Our results also emphasize the importance of realistic estimates of spatial structure for exploring transmission dynamics of wildlife diseases and provide a framework for generating a data-driven description of spatial structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Russell, Robin E. & Walsh, Daniel P. & Samuel, Michael D. & Grunnill, Martin D. & Rocke, Tonie E., 2021. "Space matters: host spatial structure and the dynamics of plague transmission," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 443(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:443:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021000235
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021000235
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lambert, Sébastien & Gilot-Fromont, Emmanuelle & Toïgo, Carole & Marchand, Pascal & Petit, Elodie & Garin-Bastuji, Bruno & Gauthier, Dominique & Gaillard, Jean-Michel & Rossi, Sophie & Thébault, Anne, 2020. "An individual-based model to assess the spatial and individual heterogeneity of Brucella melitensis transmission in Alpine ibex," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 425(C).
    2. Kieran Alden & Mark Read & Jon Timmis & Paul S Andrews & Henrique Veiga-Fernandes & Mark Coles, 2013. "Spartan: A Comprehensive Tool for Understanding Uncertainty in Simulations of Biological Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
    3. Laperrière, Vincent & Brugger, Katharina & Rubel, Franz, 2016. "Cross-scale modeling of a vector-borne disease, from the individual to the metapopulation: The seasonal dynamics of sylvatic plague in Kazakhstan," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 34-48.
    4. D. L. Borchers & M. G. Efford, 2008. "Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 377-385, June.
    5. El Saadi, N. & Bah, A. & Mahdjoub, T. & Kribs, C., 2020. "On the sylvatic transmission of T. cruzi, the parasite causing Chagas disease: a view from an agent-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 423(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanley, Brenda J. & Carstensen, Michelle & Walsh, Daniel P. & Christensen, Sonja A. & Storm, Daniel J. & Booth, James G. & Guinness, Joseph & Them, Cara E. & Ahmed, Md Sohel & Schuler, Krysten L., 2022. "Informing Surveillance through the Characterization of Outbreak Potential of Chronic Wasting Disease in White-Tailed Deer," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mevin B. Hooten & Michael R. Schwob & Devin S. Johnson & Jacob S. Ivan, 2023. "Multistage hierarchical capture–recapture models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), September.
    2. Ben C. Stevenson & Rachel M. Fewster & Koustubh Sharma, 2022. "Spatial correlation structures for detections of individuals in spatial capture–recapture models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 963-973, September.
    3. Tomáš Jůnek & Pavla Jůnková Vymyslická & Kateřina Hozdecká & Pavla Hejcmanová, 2015. "Application of Spatial and Closed Capture-Recapture Models on Known Population of the Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Jennifer B Smith & Bryan S Stevens & Dwayne R Etter & David M Williams, 2020. "Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. D. L. Borchers & B. C. Stevenson & D. Kidney & L. Thomas & T. A. Marques, 2015. "A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 195-204, March.
    6. Murray G. Efford & Christine M. Hunter, 2018. "Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 411-420, June.
    7. Felix T. Petersma & Len Thomas & Aaron M. Thode & Danielle Harris & Tiago A. Marques & Gisela V. Cheoo & Katherine H. Kim, 2024. "Accommodating False Positives Within Acoustic Spatial Capture–Recapture, with Variable Source Levels, Noisy Bearings and an Inhomogeneous Spatial Density," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(3), pages 471-490, September.
    8. Simone Tenan & Paolo Pedrini & Natalia Bragalanti & Claudio Groff & Chris Sutherland, 2017. "Data integration for inference about spatial processes: A model-based approach to test and account for data inconsistency," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Brinkmann, Katja & Kübler, Daniel & Liehr, Stefan & Buerkert, Andreas, 2021. "Agent-based modelling of the social-ecological nature of poverty traps in southwestern Madagascar," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Soumen Dey & Mohan Delampady & Ravishankar Parameshwaran & N. Samba Kumar & Arjun Srivathsa & K. Ullas Karanth, 2017. "Bayesian Methods for Estimating Animal Abundance at Large Spatial Scales Using Data from Multiple Sources," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 111-139, June.
    11. Bart J Harmsen & Rebecca J Foster & Howard Quigley, 2020. "Spatially explicit capture recapture density estimates: Robustness, accuracy and precision in a long-term study of jaguars (Panthera onca)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Murray G. Efford & Matthew R. Schofield, 2020. "A spatial open‐population capture‐recapture model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 392-402, June.
    13. Michael R. Whitehead & Rod Peakall, 2013. "Short-term but not long-term patch avoidance in an orchid-pollinating solitary wasp," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 162-168.
    14. Rajabi, Mohammadreza & Mansourian, Ali & Pilesjö, Petter & Shirzadi, Mohammad Reza & Fadaei, Reza & Ramazanpour, Javad, 2018. "A spatially explicit agent-based simulation model of a reservoir host of cutaneous leishmaniasis, Rhombomys opimus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 33-49.
    15. David L. Borchers & Tiago A. Marques, 2017. "From distance sampling to spatial capture–recapture," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 475-494, October.
    16. Mark N Read & Jacqueline Bailey & Jon Timmis & Tatyana Chtanova, 2016. "Leukocyte Motility Models Assessed through Simulation and Multi-objective Optimization-Based Model Selection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-34, September.
    17. Robert M Dorazio, 2013. "Bayes and Empirical Bayes Estimators of Abundance and Density from Spatial Capture-Recapture Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Xinhai Li & Ning Li & Baidu Li & Yuehua Sun & Erhu Gao, 2022. "AbundanceR: A Novel Method for Estimating Wildlife Abundance Based on Distance Sampling and Species Distribution Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, April.
    19. M. G. Efford, 2022. "Efficient Discretization of Movement Kernels for Spatiotemporal Capture–Recapture," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 641-651, December.
    20. Mehnaz Jahid & Holly N. Steeves & Jason T. Fisher & Simon J. Bonner & Saman Muthukumarana & Laura L. E. Cowen, 2023. "Shooting for abundance: Comparing integrated multi‐sampling models for camera trap and hair trap data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:443:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021000235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.